🎨 Artcow 3LAMESTUDIO

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
How funny that I started a thread on him just a few days before he chimped out at "HATERS" in video form. :roll:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=7IxgQItWwz0

Art Critic Valiant, coming through!

The way he painted was lazy and didn't show him sketching out the outlines and structure of the work. I wont be surprised if he copied it off screenshot he took from SFM and then just based all of the colours off the screen shot. Because you wouldn't be that consistent with colouring and shading from the start unless you've planned it beforehand, usually if you're painting with oils (especially shit oils paints, which I assume he did) it's quite easy to drybrush and blend colours due to their more fluid nature, especially if it's caked on like that, if he was using acryllics or waterpaints he would have to have to EFFORT the shading and defining of features (I expect theres no texturing too, based on no zoom ups to focal points like the eyes).

It's highly generic in it's own right too: the edges are undefined, messy static background, has no central goal of interest or any underlying quality; it's fucking bland. The only person who would want this would probably burn it like a oiled wicker.

While an artist can only be limited by their tools, this show that it is possible for tools to be limited by an artist.
 
Art Critic Valiant, coming through!

The way he painted was lazy and didn't show him sketching out the outlines and structure of the work. I wont be surprised if he copied it off screenshot he took from SFM and then just based all of the colours off the screen shot. Because you wouldn't be that consistent with colouring and shading from the start unless you've planned it beforehand, usually if you're painting with oils (especially shit oils paints, which I assume he did) it's quite easy to drybrush and blend colours due to their more fluid nature, especially if it's caked on like that, if he was using acryllics or waterpaints he would have to have to EFFORT the shading and defining of features (I expect theres no texturing too, based on no zoom ups to focal points like the eyes).

It's highly generic in it's own right too: the edges are undefined, messy static background, has no central goal of interest or any underlying quality; it's fucking bland. The only person who would want this would probably burn it like a oiled wicker.

While an artist can only be limited by their tools, this show that it is possible for tools to be limited by an artist.
Now that you mention it I think he was referencing very very heavily from a screenshot because with just straight up drawing the final lines like that it is so, so easy to fuck up proportion which is why artists sketch first so they can easily fix mistakes and change anything they aren't happy with.
 
Now that you mention it I think he was referencing very very heavily from a screenshot because with just straight up drawing the final lines like that it is so, so easy to fuck up proportion which is why artists sketch first so they can easily fix mistakes and change anything they aren't happy with.
55c5478783.jpg

Definitely a copy from a screenshot. I see no signs of artist scratching or any rethought out lines, and they've been penciled in quite deep by the looks of things.

What I did when I was a budding artist learning I was putting the reference image on a projector or using tracing paper to transfer the image. Also this motherfucker didn't matte his frame.
 
55c5478783.jpg

Definitely a copy from a screenshot. I see no signs of artist scratching or any rethought out lines, and they've been penciled in quite deep by the looks of things.
Hold up when I get back on the desktop computer I will search for the "reference" he used because there ain't no way that shit came out of his brain
 
Art Critic Valiant, coming through!

The way he painted was lazy and didn't show him sketching out the outlines and structure of the work. I wont be surprised if he copied it off screenshot he took from SFM and then just based all of the colours off the screen shot. Because you wouldn't be that consistent with colouring and shading from the start unless you've planned it beforehand, usually if you're painting with oils (especially shit oils paints, which I assume he did) it's quite easy to drybrush and blend colours due to their more fluid nature, especially if it's caked on like that, if he was using acryllics or waterpaints he would have to have to EFFORT the shading and defining of features (I expect theres no texturing too, based on no zoom ups to focal points like the eyes).

It's highly generic in it's own right too: the edges are undefined, messy static background, has no central goal of interest or any underlying quality; it's fucking bland. The only person who would want this would probably burn it like a oiled wicker.

While an artist can only be limited by their tools, this show that it is possible for tools to be limited by an artist.
Funny thing is, he did a few more of these videos too.

Notice he's using a pen in that second video. Shouldn't you use a pencil before you ink the sketch? I really get the feeling his mind is only accustomed to using digital tools.
 
See my suspicions lie not in the proof he has made it, but lack of it. Nothing tracing like missing steps in the art process.

All these images are posed models outlines being smeared on with oil paints. He literally smears the paint with his hands in the bird video.

With the ballpoint pen one: fnaf is popular for one main reason... its easy to draw because literally they're primitive shapes and require no understanding on how to pose. They're just simple objects. It also helps to have a screenshot of the image itself near as well :^)

Really what I'm saying...

 
Last edited:
See my suspicions lie not in the proof he has made it, but lack of it. Nothing tracing like missing steps in the art process.

All these images are posed models outlines being smeared on with oil paints. He literally smears the paint with his hands in the bird video.

With the ballpoint pen one: fnaf is popular for one main reason... its easy to draw because literally they're primitive shapes and require no understanding on how to pose. They're just simple objects. It also helps to have a screenshot of the image itself near as well :^)

Really what I'm saying...

https://youtube.com/watch?v=dMwhZryRUr4
Yeah, but as I said, it's not right to be doing a sketch completely in pen. I know they're easy to do. And sometimes a reference can help with something complicated (which I am aware that these are far from).

But he is a lazy fuck, that is undeniable.
 
I watched his videos that you guys posted and I just have no idea what to say.
There are adjectives that need to be invented for these types of videos.

I mean, he can use oil on canvas better than me, but that still means it's shit.
 
This video is so utterly devoid of meaning that it's actually a work of art. I've shared it with all my friends. They hate me.
 
Back
Top Bottom