JustSomeFella
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2014
The likes/dislikes ratio for all of his videos is hilarious.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How funny that I started a thread on him just a few days before he chimped out at "HATERS" in video form.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=7IxgQItWwz0
Now that you mention it I think he was referencing very very heavily from a screenshot because with just straight up drawing the final lines like that it is so, so easy to fuck up proportion which is why artists sketch first so they can easily fix mistakes and change anything they aren't happy with.Art Critic Valiant, coming through!
The way he painted was lazy and didn't show him sketching out the outlines and structure of the work. I wont be surprised if he copied it off screenshot he took from SFM and then just based all of the colours off the screen shot. Because you wouldn't be that consistent with colouring and shading from the start unless you've planned it beforehand, usually if you're painting with oils (especially shit oils paints, which I assume he did) it's quite easy to drybrush and blend colours due to their more fluid nature, especially if it's caked on like that, if he was using acryllics or waterpaints he would have to have to EFFORT the shading and defining of features (I expect theres no texturing too, based on no zoom ups to focal points like the eyes).
It's highly generic in it's own right too: the edges are undefined, messy static background, has no central goal of interest or any underlying quality; it's fucking bland. The only person who would want this would probably burn it like a oiled wicker.
While an artist can only be limited by their tools, this show that it is possible for tools to be limited by an artist.
Now that you mention it I think he was referencing very very heavily from a screenshot because with just straight up drawing the final lines like that it is so, so easy to fuck up proportion which is why artists sketch first so they can easily fix mistakes and change anything they aren't happy with.
Hold up when I get back on the desktop computer I will search for the "reference" he used because there ain't no way that shit came out of his brain![]()
Definitely a copy from a screenshot. I see no signs of artist scratching or any rethought out lines, and they've been penciled in quite deep by the looks of things.
As I said, he most likely posed the model in SFM or Gmod and shone a front light on it.Hold up when I get back on the desktop computer I will search for the "reference" he used because there ain't no way that shit came out of his brain
I think you're right because I can't find the exact poseAs I said, he most likely posed the model in SFM or Gmod and shone a front light on it.
In fact here is the ragdoll.
Funny thing is, he did a few more of these videos too.Art Critic Valiant, coming through!
The way he painted was lazy and didn't show him sketching out the outlines and structure of the work. I wont be surprised if he copied it off screenshot he took from SFM and then just based all of the colours off the screen shot. Because you wouldn't be that consistent with colouring and shading from the start unless you've planned it beforehand, usually if you're painting with oils (especially shit oils paints, which I assume he did) it's quite easy to drybrush and blend colours due to their more fluid nature, especially if it's caked on like that, if he was using acryllics or waterpaints he would have to have to EFFORT the shading and defining of features (I expect theres no texturing too, based on no zoom ups to focal points like the eyes).
It's highly generic in it's own right too: the edges are undefined, messy static background, has no central goal of interest or any underlying quality; it's fucking bland. The only person who would want this would probably burn it like a oiled wicker.
While an artist can only be limited by their tools, this show that it is possible for tools to be limited by an artist.
Yeah, but as I said, it's not right to be doing a sketch completely in pen. I know they're easy to do. And sometimes a reference can help with something complicated (which I am aware that these are far from).See my suspicions lie not in the proof he has made it, but lack of it. Nothing tracing like missing steps in the art process.
All these images are posed models outlines being smeared on with oil paints. He literally smears the paint with his hands in the bird video.
With the ballpoint pen one: fnaf is popular for one main reason... its easy to draw because literally they're primitive shapes and require no understanding on how to pose. They're just simple objects. It also helps to have a screenshot of the image itself near as well :^)
Really what I'm saying...
https://youtube.com/watch?v=dMwhZryRUr4
Kids and stupid adults, you mean.Even if it was proved that he traced little kids will still defend him because little kids are dumb
https://youtube.com/watch?v=vV9npkF7mTwThis video is so utterly devoid of meaning that it's actually a work of art. I've shared it with all my friends. They hate me.
Points for anyone who can think up a valud reason that video exists
Aside from autism
Because someone somewhere probably wanted it? And that someone is the guy who made it?Points for anyone who can think up a valud reason that video exists
Aside from autism
Because someone somewhere probably wanted it? And that someone is the guy who made it?
10 bucks says they'll steal it for an episode of the series.