This is what the lolicon (and "immoral fiction" in general) debate comes down to, people who take issue with it's morality solely boils down to "it makes me uncomfortable, therefore it is bad".
There is no other standard that matters to them, which is why they unironically say things like this "Child molestion makes me uncomfortable, lolicon makes me uncomfortable too, so they're equally bad"
While in reality, and to anyone who actually puts some *thought* into their morality, going beyond immediate emotional reactions to concepts will realize this is objectively not true because you can measure the impact they have on people in reality.
Child porn/sexual abuse is bad because of the physical and emotional damage it causes to children because of their involvement, they are physically., emotionally and inherently involved in the acts.
The same can not be said for lolicon, in fact they are so disconnected that if children mysteriously vanished off the face of the earth, lolicon could still be produced, even one hundred years after the fact, it could still be made, because children play literally no role or involvement to its creation and thus are completely unaffected by it. The lack of physical and emotional damage is what makes them different and is what makes one okay and the other not.
Anyone who doesn't agree, anyone who says they are equally as bad are simply stating "I do not care about the harm it causes kids, I care about how much it upsets me to think about"
Also I'm aware the person I'm replying to is obviously posting in bad faith but people like this do exist.