A collection of generally non-contributive posts in the Furry Fandom and Drama General


I guess we're all supposed to be real mad about this or whatever but my immediate knee-jerk reactions are: 1) PJW is a faggot and 2) imagine the sheer lol potential of being a chaotic evil bully in a school where some dorks are cringe LARPing as fucking cats or whatever, and the staff has issued a declaration that you're not allowed to complain or fight back. time to toothpaste up and spread some rabies bitch
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Shlomo XL
but I think instantly believing this stuff when there's no actual tangible proof of it is kinda dumb.
I wish I lived in whatever sunshine-and-lollipops alternate universe you live in, where there was still room to hope that we don't live under the boot heels of depraved fiends, while our only possible help are moral cowards who love being slaves to evil in the name of "taking the high road."

This will continue unabated. If anything, the staff will encourage it and even participate in it. And the media will praise it.

Assume nothing but the darkest, most evil shit from these fuckers. Even the slightest benefit of the doubt is all they need for their cancer to spread.

Negrate me and call me a schizo all you want. You'll change your tune years from now, when WaPo is cheering on the Stunning Bravery of Whimsyfang for consent-accidenting your own kid on livestream.
 
Last edited:
If they do something they get in trouble for, it's usually for laughs. It's not for something serious, like concerns for their own safety.
lol

lmao even
Bad kids doing bad things? It doesn't. Good kids? Yeah, it dissuades them.
Exactly. So, are we to assume everyone outside of this cabal of biting furries is a good kid, and that it's only the furries that are the bad ones? Yeah, I don't buy it. Especially in this day and age. Someone would have posted the pics.

Don't get me wrong. I'll gladly eat my words if I'm wrong, but as it stands? I would like to see actual evidence first.
I wish I lived in whatever sunshine-and-lollipops alternate universe you live in, where there was still room to hope that we don't live under the boot heels of depraved fiends, while our only possible help are moral cowards who love being slaves to evil in the name of "taking the high road."
Are you okay? Like seriously? Because all I did was say that instantly believing shit without any physical proof is dumb, and you're acting like that's somehow unreasonable.
 
Are you okay? Like seriously? Because all I did was say that instantly believing shit without any physical proof is dumb, and you're acting like that's somehow unreasonable.
No, it's unreasonable to give an inch to groups that always takes a mile.

Assume the worst of your enemies. Put the burden of proof on them. Hold their feet to the fire. And if they deny it and get defensive about it, treat that as proof of their guilt.

They have no qualms about doing the same to you.
 
Fucking christ, I'm convinced that since 2012, we were put in mass stasis by an advanced alien race, and we are living in a simulated world like The Matrix, but instead of new generations being born, they are just computer generated from all the errant memories of what we think people are compiled into a generation of randomly-generated composite people.

These people can't be real.
 
Listen, I'm not saying furries aren't gross degenerates, or that this story is impossible, but I think instantly believing this stuff when there's no actual tangible proof of it is kinda dumb.

I prefer to think of it as being 100% legitimate, but the catch is that all the hard proof is on the TikToks, Snapchat, and Instagram stories of all the minors who partook. You forget: there's an entire (somewhat obfuscated) dimension to the way that kids these days interact. Obviously, such things can be archived but do you expect teenagers to know how to archive stuff like that?

Unsubstantiated speculation on my part, but what else in this thread isn't?
 
No, it's unreasonable to give an inch to groups that always takes a mile.

Assume the worst of your enemies. Put the burden of proof on them. Hold their feet to the fire. And if they deny it and get defensive about it, treat that as proof of their guilt.

They have no qualms about doing the same to you.
No thanks. I'd rather not act like a crazy leftist troon.
 
Nobody wanted to get that close to it?
Zoomers will climb on top of moving trains for selfies and social media clout. If something unusual happens their first reaction is to grab their phone.
I wish I lived in whatever sunshine-and-lollipops alternate universe you live in, where there was still room to hope that we don't live under the boot heels of depraved fiends, while our only possible help are moral cowards who love being slaves to evil in the name of "taking the high road."
All he asked for was proof you sped, not some inane boomer brain rot.
 
No, it's unreasonable to give an inch to groups that always takes a mile.

Assume the worst of your enemies. Put the burden of proof on them. Hold their feet to the fire. And if they deny it and get defensive about it, treat that as proof of their guilt.

They have no qualms about doing the same to you.
They hated dumbvoted him because he told them the truth.
 
No, it's unreasonable to give an inch to groups that always takes a mile.

Assume the worst of your enemies. Put the burden of proof on them. Hold their feet to the fire. And if they deny it and get defensive about it, treat that as proof of their guilt.

They have no qualms about doing the same to you.
>you.jpg
4162049-3c6dad01157b5d712c1a2a67ddb5a72d.jpg

I think you have some unresolved trust issues man. I'm not even joking.
 
No thanks. I'd rather not act like a crazy leftist troon.
You got a better solution? Leftist troons (and other such Machiavellian psychopaths) win and rule our society because they don't have consciences to inhibit their agenda.

You don't have to be a liar and a slanderer like them, but you shouldn't feel obligated to give them the benefit of the doubt when you hear rumors about them. You can assume that worst you hear of them is true.

When has "when they go low, we go high" ever been beneficial? Or when has doubting their depravity ever been the right call?

All the proof you need is that the same people telling you "the litter boxes weren't real" are the same people who lied to you about everything else. They did not somehow grow a conscience between then and now.
 
Last edited:
and they still say shit like "Furries doing one bad thing ≠ all" type shit, even when furries get exposed for like the fucking trillionth time, furries are actually retarded.
I can get the "it's not all of us" argument most of the time, but with furries it doesn't work as much because the simple fact is they cover shit like this up so it won't further taint the reputation of their community. We outright saw that shit during the Kero the Wolf incident.

They'll go to absurd lengths to keep normies from hearing about this stuff, making them complicit in it.
 
There needs to be a "Law" for this, like Lenz's Law or Murphy's Law or w/e. It sounds like some sort of Law. People who gripe and moan and mock something the loudest and longest are the most likely to be guilty of doing that same thing. What was the name of that one vehemently anti-gay senator who was discovered years later to be leading quite possibly The most homosexual double life imaginable? We could name it after that guy
"Cats Law."
Noun:
(Those who are most vocal and gripe the most about a behavior / group are often the most guilty of said behavior or part of said group.)
 
You got a better solution? Leftist troons (and other such Machiavellian psychopaths) win and rule our society because they don't have consciences to inhibit their agenda.

You don't have to be a liar and a slanderer like them, but you shouldn't feel obligated to give them the benefit of the doubt when you hear rumors about them. You can assume that worst you hear of them is true.
1713826476496.png
 
Back