Highlighting content is part of the globohomo agenda to stop people from reading my shitposts. That being said, I think this was sorely needed and appreciate its implementation. I felt highlighting posts would be most useful to me for big megathreads like Wu, DSP, Greer, etc so I went through the Greer thread as I had fallen behind. I must echo other posters in that adding a next highlighted button on the post itself would be a winning addition that makes this good feature great. I did not experience any errors and was overall happy with the highlight function. I feel like it hit on pertinent happenings in the Greerverse. I will go through the thread post by post when I get the chance and update if that assessment changes because some thing was left out.
I do have some comments about the content being highlighted. One of the posts was a funny shop that I enjoyed, but there was also a Greer story that many people enjoyed where as I don't personally care about rping or song parodies, etc from the community. Personally I care more about catching up on the highlights of what the cow is doing as opposed to funny thread stuff. You'll have to ultimately decide what content you feel should be highlighted. That's my opinion. The only highlighted post I actually had a problem with was from a newfriend who admitted to not reading the entirety of the thread, but wanted to rant. It got a lot of positive response because a lot of people feel the way they do. It also got quite a few late reactions because the topic of their post has been discussed ad nauseum. I think that a threshold, lower than the initial highlight requirement, for negative rating should be explored to prevent posts like that from getting highlighted if it hasn't been already and adjusted if it has. I don't care about some fag's first post where he says Greer is a bad songwriter and is dunning kruger af despite the fact that myself and many others agree.
All in all a great and sorely needed tool that makes content more accessible.