In any case, I can understand how one would not want to have a child live a miserable and short existence due to a life-threatening birth defect. Still, as I alluded to earlier, miracles do sometimes happen. It is not too infrequently that you see fluff pieces in the newspapers about some baby that beat the odds and survived some congenital heart defect, and I suspect that we will continue to improve in our capabilities to save the lives of defective children and allow them to live reasonably comfortable lives as time goes on.
The argument in favor of abortion regarding whether or not a child should be born at all if he has no arms and half a spine always arises in discussions on the topic of abortion, yet I would like to see exactly what portion of abortions are actually undergone for that purpose. How does portion compare with the portion that are performed because people, both teens and adults, decide to play around and don't want to face the consequences of their actions?