Crime Actor Danny Masterson found guilty of 2 out of 3 counts of rape in retrial

Link / Archive

LOS ANGELES (AP) — A jury found “That ’70s Show” star Danny Masterson guilty of two out of three counts of rape Wednesday in a Los Angeles retrial in which the Church of Scientology played a central role.

The jury of seven women and five men reached the verdict after deliberating for seven days spread over two weeks. They could not reach a verdict on the third count, that alleged Masterson raped a longtime girlfriend. They had voted 8-4 in favor of conviction.

Masterson was led from the courtroom in handcuffs. The 47-year-old actor faces up to 30 years in prison.

His wife, actor and model Bijou Phillips, wept as he was led away. Other family and friends sat stone-faced.

“I am experiencing a complex array of emotions – relief, exhaustion, strength, sadness – knowing that my abuser, Danny Masterson, will face accountability for his criminal behavior,” one of the women, whom Masterson was convicted of raping at his home in 2003, said in a statement.





The woman, whose count left the jury deadlocked, said in the statement: “While I’m encouraged that Danny Masterson will face some criminal punishment, I am devastated that he has dodged criminal accountability for his heinous conduct against me.”

Prosecutors, retrying Masterson after a deadlocked jury led to a mistrial in December, said he forcibly raped three women, including a longtime girlfriend, in his Hollywood Hills home between 2001 and 2003. They told jurors he drugged the women’s drinks so he could rape them. They said he used his prominence in the church — where all three women were also members at the time — to avoid consequences for decades.

Masterson did not testify, and his lawyers called no witnesses. The defense argued that the acts were consensual, and attempted to discredit the women’s stories by highlighting changes and inconsistencies over time, which they said showed signs of coordination between them.




“If you decide that a witness deliberately lied about something in this case,” defense attorney Philip Cohen told jurors, going through their instructions in his closing argument, “You should consider not believing anything that witness says.”

The Church of Scientology played a significant role in the first trial but arguably an even larger one in the second. Judge Charlaine F. Olmedo allowed expert testimony on church policy from a former official in Scientology leadership who has become a prominent opponent.




Tensions ran high in the courtroom between current and former Scientologists, and even leaked into testimony, with the accusers saying on the stand that they felt intimidated by some members in the room.

Actor Leah Remini, a former member who has become the church’s highest-profile critic, sat in on the trial at times, putting her arm around one of the accusers to comfort her during closing arguments.

Founded in 1953 by L. Ron Hubbard, the Church of Scientology has many members who work in Hollywood. The judge kept limits on how much prosecutors could talk about the church, and primarily allowed it to explain why the women took so long to go to authorities.

The women testified that when they reported Masterson to church officials, they were told they were not raped, were put through ethics programs themselves, and were warned against going to law enforcement to report a member of such high standing.

“They were raped, they were punished for it, and they were retaliated against,” Deputy District Attorney Reinhold Mueller told jurors in his closing argument. “Scientology told them there’s no justice for them. You have the opportunity to show them there is justice.”

The church vehemently denied having any policy that forbids members from going to secular authorities.




The Associated Press does not typically name people who say they’ve been sexually abused.

Testimony in this case was graphic and emotional.

Two women, who knew Masterson from social circles in the church, said he gave them drinks and that they then became woozy or passed out before he violently raped them in 2003.

The third, Masterson’s then-girlfriend of five years, said she awoke to find him raping her, and had to pull his hair to stop him.

The issue of drugging also played a major role in the retrial. At the first, Olmedo only allowed prosecutors and accusers to describe their disorientation, and to imply that they were drugged. The second time, they were allowed to argue it directly, and the prosecution attempted to make it a major factor, to no avail.

“The defendant drugs his victims to gain control,” Deputy District Attorney Ariel Anson said in her closing argument. “He does this to take away his victims’ ability to consent.”

Masterson was not charged with any counts of drugging, and there is no toxicology evidence to back up the assertion. His attorney asked for a mistrial over the issue’s inclusion. The motion was denied, but the issue is likely to be a major factor in any potential appeal.

These charges date to a period when Masterson was at the height of his fame, starring from 1998 until 2006 as Steven Hyde on Fox’s “That ’70s Show” — the show that made stars of Ashton Kutcher, Mila Kunis and Topher Grace.

Masterson had reunited with Kutcher on the 2016 Netflix comedy “The Ranch,” but was written off the show when an LAPD investigation was revealed in December 2017.
 
The jury of seven women and five men

Ok, let's be Devil's Advocate here for a hot fucking second.

1. Clown World
2. Women fucking lie. All the time. En masse.
3. Faggots exist.
4. Simps exist.
6. (Because I'm not good at indexing) Could not reach a verdict over two weeks on a third count.
5. Girlfriend was 'raped'.


Sounds suspiciously like reasonable doubt.

Discuss amongst yourselves.
 
Ok, let's be Devil's Advocate here for a hot fucking second.

1. Clown World
2. Women fucking lie. All the time. En masse.
3. Faggots exist.
4. Simps exist.
6. (Because I'm not good at indexing) Could not reach a verdict over two weeks on a third count.
5. Girlfriend was 'raped'.


Sounds suspiciously like reasonable doubt.

Discuss amongst yourselves.
Buddy, I'd agree with you, BUT, considering the absurd influence the Church of Scientology holds over the political and legal system in California and how far they will go to protect one of their own, especially a high profile member like Masterson, him getting convicted anyway means he's practically 150% guilty.
 
Don't forget Laura apparently got Ben Foster into it.

Their youngest rising "star" is Chloe Fineman. She does shit impressions on SNL and she seriously has serial killer eyes. Like there's literally nothing there. She's a fucking psycho. You might see her in ads for Absolute Vodka.
Her Jen Coolidge impression is complete shit btw.
 
Ok, let's be Devil's Advocate here for a hot fucking second.

1. Clown World
2. Women fucking lie. All the time. En masse.
3. Faggots exist.
4. Simps exist.
6. (Because I'm not good at indexing) Could not reach a verdict over two weeks on a third count.
5. Girlfriend was 'raped'.


Sounds suspiciously like reasonable doubt.

Discuss amongst yourselves.
Have you ever seen any interviews with Danny Masterson? He's an absolute piece of shit. It's not an interview unless he's saying something batshit insane and sexually aggressive. He gives no fucks who knows what he's like, Xenu will protect him.
This isn't a wah wah wahmen are so mean to menz thing. These rumors have been swirling for years and years.
He even paid them off back in the day.

He's guilty as fuck, though he's in L.A so he shouldn't get 30 years, 3 months will do it.
 
Have you ever seen any interviews with Danny Masterson? He's an absolute piece of shit. It's not an interview unless he's saying something batshit insane and sexually aggressive. He gives no fucks who knows what he's like, Xenu will protect him.
This isn't a wah wah wahmen are so mean to menz thing. These rumors have been swirling for years and years.
He even paid them off back in the day.

He's guilty as fuck, though he's in L.A so he shouldn't get 30 years, 3 months will do it.
I admit I have not. I didn't really watch the show, although I didn't like him when I did. I also didn't like Kunis.

So I admit I'm ignorant about it. I consider myself schooled on this point.
 
I admit I have not. I didn't really watch the show, although I didn't like him when I did. I also didn't like Kunis.

So I admit I'm ignorant about it. I consider myself schooled on this point.
There's random interviews on YT with him and he's... a creep. Not just a normal creep or a creep by modern internet standards, but a genuine "I'll choke you to death and rape you" creep.
He has an air of seething aggression and control.

There's a reason why he's with Bijou and why he's kept a tight reign on her career since they hooked up (i.e, he has starred with her in at least 2 of her projects). He's an absolute predator.
 
There's random interviews on YT with him and he's... a creep. Not just a normal creep or a creep by modern internet standards, but a genuine "I'll choke you to death and rape you" creep.
He has an air of seething aggression and control.

There's a reason why he's with Bijou and why he's kept a tight reign on her career since they hooked up (i.e, he has starred with her in at least 2 of her projects). He's an absolute predator.
You of course have proof of these allegations, not just decade + old accusations and your personal feelings?
 
Well, that he's raped a couple people has been proven in court despite the best cult-funded legal representation money can buy.
What evidence was there, though? Not asking flippantly, I want to know what they actually had to convict him on 10+ years after the fact. I've no doubt Masterson is a scumbag but I want to know how they proved it.
 
What evidence was there, though? Not asking flippantly, I want to know what they actually had to convict him on 10+ years after the fact. I've no doubt Masterson is a scumbag but I want to know how they proved it.
Well, unfortunately it is seriously one of those he-said she-said situations where the jury just clearly believed (two out of three) of the accusers over the defendant and considered it beyond a reasonable doubt. It's almost all their personal testimony and the belief in the jury that it was truthful, and some circumstantial shit (i.e. everyone was actually in the place claimed at the times claimed).

There's pretty extensive coverage of most of the trial.
 
What evidence was there, though? Not asking flippantly, I want to know what they actually had to convict him on 10+ years after the fact. I've no doubt Masterson is a scumbag but I want to know how they proved it.
Well, he paid off his victims a while ago, the cult covered his ass, he of course could be innocent and just paid them off for the sake of it, but he's also in a cult. The same cult that has Tom Cruise.
They had some reports from a long time ago, Hollywood P.D? I believe Chrissy Carnell was the one to file it.
Hollywood P.D and LAPD have historically been deep in Scientology's pockets, so the likekihood of them actioning the complaints at the peak of Scientology's power was slim.
I believe they also had Scientology records from Chrissy, where she had a session after the rape and spoke about it. Or it was the first victim, who was deep in Scientology.

Masterson really isn't /ourguy, wrongly persecuted and battling a bunch of "lying femoids".
Yeah, the claims are historical, but they're pretty convincing. I would recommend Andrew Gold's coverage on Danny and Scientology if you want direct details of the claims and more indepth info. It's not a simple case, scientology is deeply wrapped up in it.

He had a clear M.O, complaints were made at the time, he has a hideous reputation, he's part of a cult, he had good representation that failed to defend him twice over... I feel it's safe to say he's as guilty as can reasonably be.
 
Last edited:
And the funny thing is that Beck is still considered to be one of the nicest, if not charismatic, musicians to be in the mainstream. I've never heard bad things said about him since even before I found out he was a Scientologist, he mainly kept his private life private.
Beck wasn't a convert, his parents were both Scientologists and he was raised in the religion (like Neil Gaiman, BTW). If he has negative feelings about the cult, he knows that he wouldn't be able to speak to his extended family again if he made them public. By the same token, the CoS doesn't really require members to publicly proselytize and doesn't do their famous smear/shun/blacklist jobs if you quietly disaffiliate, so silence is the default option for the least amount of trouble.
 
Beck wasn't a convert, his parents were both Scientologists and he was raised in the religion (like Neil Gaiman, BTW). If he has negative feelings about the cult, he knows that he wouldn't be able to speak to his extended family again if he made them public. By the same token, the CoS doesn't really require members to publicly proselytize and doesn't do their famous smear/shun/blacklist jobs if you quietly disaffiliate, so silence is the default option for the least amount of trouble.
Beck said he left the cult in a 2019 interview
 
They've been pretty gimped since getting clowned on by Chanology and South Park.
I think it was that Leah Remini series that really put the nails in the coffin of Scientology. But there's a new sucker born every minute. So I wouldn't be surprised if Scientology gets a second wind decades from now.

I don't think anyone, read normies, really gave a shit about Chanology, or Trapped in the Closet, or Going Clear.
 
Back