AI Art Seething General

MagneticTowels said:
Pastebin wouldn't let me make it public. I guess I don't know how to use it.

Anyways. they came from search.pullpush.io.
Click to expand...
Ah, well these quotes ought to be preserved (in context with this post documenting his...predilections):

/r/aiwars ● /u/itzmoepi ● Thu Jun 20 2024 16:50:52 GMT-0400[See on Reddit]
comment
It's a violation of freedom of speech, it's literally the censorship of artistic expression that you don't like. No one has ever been convicted of loli in the US, plea deals are a common scare tactic and so many people take them even if they are innocent just to avoid all the time and costs of going to trial.
It's offensive for you to even equate loli to csam, where one is an artistic expression and the other is a crime. It's a weird double standard when you attack loli but never say anything about some of the art on say, r/guro, which shows dead corpses. Should that also be banned? From my naive opinion, it seems like it can turn people into murderers.
Click to expand...
/r/aiwars ● /u/itzmoepi ● Thu Jun 20 2024 18:09:02 GMT-0400[See on Reddit]
comment
Cartoon porn is never considered csam under any definition, don't you understand that it requires a real child being abused? Cartoons will never fall into that definition. If loli was actually considered cp every website on the internet hosting it would be nuked, and that includes some major social medias that allow it like twitter.
Loli art passes the Miller test under the third condition because it has artistic value. Some states did pass their own laws, but they can probably be struck down as being unconstitutional if challenged, and they never have because every person that was convicted of loli in the US took a plea bargain and the cases never went to trial. In other states as well as federally it's legal.
Law enforcement also has more important things to do than convict people for drawings which they already said not to report because it's a waste of their resources.
I would rather ask you why you want to put people who look at animations/cartoons in jail when you can easily just not search for it and you will never find it. This is just a "ban all the things that offend me" because loli doesn't actually harm anyone, about as much as you harmed all the npc's you killed in a video game.
Click to expand...
/r/aiwars ● /u/itzmoepi ● Thu Jun 20 2024 18:59:47 GMT-0400[See on Reddit]
comment
Whorley got 20 years because he had possession of actual csam and was a past offender. Do you even read the cases you cite? Handley was probably the only case exclusively about loli and that didn't have other convictions with the actually illegal thing.
Everything drawn by an artist has artistic value, I don't really care what it is. It should never matter what it is because censoring anything drawn by someone goes against free speech (other countries without free speech have done what they want and did ban it).
Lolis don't look or act like children. Saying that you attracted to children because you like lolis is a false conclusion. To put it into perspective, it's like saying furries are into beastiality, people who like tentacle porn are into octopus porn, and as mentioned before, people who like guro art wants to murder someone.
It's way more unethical to look at actual porn which takes advantage of real people in vulnerable situations, to make porn for money. Your so-called ethical alternative is in fact way more unethical than looking at drawings could ever be.
Click to expand...
/r/aiwars ● /u/itzmoepi ● Thu Jun 20 2024 19:56:50 GMT-0400[See on Reddit]
comment
They have vastly exaggerated features that doesn't look anything like a real child, such as huge eyes, lack of a nose, lack of blemishes, different proportions. They often speak coherently whereas most children can barely talk and are mostly crying.
Your misconception is that csam is illegal because of the act but it's illegal because it's hurting real, flesh and blood children. You are confused why loli shouldn't be illegal if it's the same "act" but it's because it's not harming anyone, those animations don't exist in reality.
People like lolis because they find them cute and they are attracted to cute things? Or alternatively they are just attracted to the artstyle. For example I find characters drawn in anime artstyle more attractive and don't like the western cartoons artstyle because it just looks worse in my opinion.
What do you even want to do to people who looked at loli? Put them in prison for years and years and ruin their life for looking at a drawing or animation? That is really f*cked up. How is this any consistent with all the other crimes that harm real people?
Click to expand...
/r/aiwars ● /u/itzmoepi ● Thu Jun 20 2024 21:38:08 GMT-0400[See on Reddit]
comment
> you’re close minded and want to protect your “right” to get off to Klee getting raped by Hilichurls
It's called a fantasy and if Klee was real I will never want to hurt her. I don't think prolonging this conversation is any productive, bye bye.
Click to expand...
 
  • Lunacy
  • Winner
Reactions: Ether Being, woowie queen, Linoone and 3 others
According to X and Tumblr, if yo use AI, then you are killing the planet.

Screenshot 2024-06-24 at 23-50-24 Tracy Yardley! (commissions closed) (@yardleyart).pngmedia_GQ4uONCW4AAOiVr.jpgmedia_GQ4uOM-XsAA4GLt.jpgmedia_GQ4uONBWUAAu2Kc.jpgmedia_GQ4uONBXEAARO_9.jpg

Screenshot 2024-06-24 at 23-52-24 Alex Malcolm aka Lexx (@LexxMoves).png


Screenshot 2024-06-24 at 23-59-00 AI’s excessive water consumption threatens to drown out its ...png
 
Last edited:
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Da Grim Reaper, Ether Being, Horribadger and 1 other person
Lunar Eclipse Paradox said:
I've had experience in making images in AI and to be honest, the process doing it just gets really boring after awhile compared to drawing and painting irl. I find AI to be more like a novelty.
Click to expand...
I'm not too good of an artist, but I find that as well. It often ends up with you spending 3 hours generating the same image over and over, ending with something that's only sort of what you wanted.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Kiwi2Shoes, George Geef, weirdMcGee and 4 others
6MillionCoofs said:
I have a question, what is the best ai generator to use?
Click to expand...
DALL-E 3 if you feel like navigating a minefield of censorship, since it has the best sense of composition that makes everything in the picture fit together.

Otherwise get Stable Diffusion and load it up with all the shit that makes it look good.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Ether Being, Baraadmirer and Dunkin DoNUT
linchan said:
Art theft is a retarded concept in the digital age.
Click to expand...
More of a retarded name. The concept of most things on the Internet, having some kind of a licence attached, is agreed upon by most.

I would be in favor of abolishing it, but it would have to apply to everything that touches the Internet (including leaked source code, ripped movies,...). Mostly because I think the result of everything entering the public domain overnight, would be funny and mainly fuck over the right kinds of people.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Toolbox, Digital Thunder, Ether Being and 4 others
GratsTheat783 said:
What would be a good way of making sure AI stuff you download hasn't had malware put into it?
Click to expand...
If you're running some obscure bullshit from GitHub (or a similar site, even a retarded furry can bruteforce in and change the code), run it in a virtual machine.

None of these impotent Redditors, including Moviebob - the somehow even fatter version of Fatrick, can accomplish anything.

That aside, the real menace might already be on the horizon, in the form of lawmaking boomers, who come to make them list the source of every last copyrighted image and song, in these datasets.

Screenshot_2024-06-27-17-42-39-758_com.lemurbrowser.exts-edit.jpg
(article - archive)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: lolcow yoghurt, Vecr and Ether Being
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back