AI Art Seething General

Save the Loli said:
There's tons of Japanese artists on Twitter with "do not use for AI art" in their profile. They're just as autistic as Westerners about it, they just don't inject whiny identity politics or environmentalism into it.
Click to expand...
I want a model that is specifically trained on art that is tagged not for ai use. Just to see the shitstorm.
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • Agree
Reactions: triple baka, Elim Garak, Dunkin DoNUT and 22 others
if they do come for the art generators. The ai prompt jockeys should ask why they aren't doing anything to compensate the legions of writers, technicians, programmers etc that are stolen from in Chatgpt and why you aren't hearing nearly as much chatter to just shut it down. (its seen as too valuable)
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Elim Garak, Toolbox, Puff and 2 others
grump said:
if they do come for the art generators. The ai prompt jockeys should ask why they aren't doing anything to compensate the legions of writers, technicians, programmers etc that are stolen from in Chatgpt and why you aren't hearing nearly as much chatter to just shut it down. (its seen as too valuable)
Click to expand...
I think it really is as simple as twitter artists being obnoxious, overtly vocal and self centered people
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Elim Garak, Donny Cheese, DungeonMaster and 3 others
Runescape Sperg said:
I think it really is as simple as twitter artists being obnoxious, overtly vocal and self centered people
Click to expand...


what argument will they use once the ai generators start hiring people to provide training data and the vast majority minus a few who are a few bucks richer are in the exact same position they are in now?
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Elim Garak and A-A-AAsssston!
Ether Being said:
It really makes me lose faith for humanity in that twitter thread when they disdain the opportunity for AI assisted art(+human style of sketch layout img2img) where those features are a god-send personally as a sketch artist because it speeds up the most tedious process I've never enjoyed about making art; "the polishing a turd process of painting and coloring".
A lot of these twitter weebs in that thread are misunderstanding how beneficial the AI tools speed up the process for japan's suicidal tedious overworked industry where some workers barely see their families at all, it seems like a bunch of full-retard mental gymnastics for these brainlets when they don't see the bigger demoralizing picture of media arts.
Click to expand...
you know the great thing about twitter is that any "change" they do on there hardly affects jackshit in the real world. Whether they whine, cry, screech and dilate, it doesn't matter. Human progress will continue at their discretion and there is nothing they can do about it. Cope and Seethe drawfags, either pull up or bite the dust :gunt:
 
  • Optimistic
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Ether Being, lolcow yoghurt, secret watcher and 1 other person
Iwasamwillbe said:
I can't help but notice that Japan as a whole has had a more blasé attitude towards AI art than the West, or really anywhere else in the world. I really do wonder why.
Click to expand...
Japan is a no confrontation society and seeks to avoid drama but you'll occassionally see the "fuck proompters" sentiment considering they hate how this shit is clogging up pixiv.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Elim Garak, Justwandering02, woowie queen and 1 other person
I'm kind of torn on this issue. While I do think that the majority of "artists" are whiny and pretentious and constantly trample over eachother for validation; the use of AI art in the future for most things is just another characteristic of how technology has transformed people from creators to consoomers. Like, why put the effort, go through trial and error and spend hours doing something when some computer can just do some generated crap leagues ahead of your skill in seconds? More time to consoom!

Most art nowdays is mass produced and repetitive anyways. Twitter and other social media have transformed art into something you just skim your eyes over, get slight serotonin, and move on to the next autistic and bright-colored scribble of nothing. The term "artist" is thrown around too much these days, so it's up to the individual to consoom responsibly, not blame the computer for being a neat tool to others.

Not like it matters, reading is way better. ;)
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: ⚞⛇⚟, Elim Garak, Instant_Pot_User and 19 others
Technology keeps progressing and new ways of automating and simplifying the artistic process is going to happen. If you're any good of an artist and a businessman you'll survive as artists before have, if not, then you can enjoy complaining on Youtube about "le evil job stealer" while getting a $1 on Patreon. Not that I don't have my grumbling on how this makes art more consoomy and accessible.
 
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Elim Garak, Ether Being, Vecr and 2 others
Screenshot_20230225-184730.png
 
  • Like
  • Horrifying
  • Late
Reactions: Dunkin DoNUT, NevskyProspekt, Puff and 9 others
If you can copyright a random photograph with zero alteration, I don't see how you can't copyright an AI image. Or are there cheats, like if I apply some stupid filters to the AI image and edit it a bit, I've now made it a transformative work and therefore have the copyright? If I don't have the copyright, then who does? Absolutely nonsense.
Toolbox said:
Who wants to bet they're going to flip flop on this issue for years?
Click to expand...
Once Getty/stock image companies get their own propietary AI, THEN it'll be okay to copyright AI images.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Dunkin DoNUT, George Geef, The Lawgiver and 12 others
Toolbox said:
Who wants to bet they're going to flip flop on this issue for years?
Click to expand...
The lines are going to be blurry for individual works submitted for copyright. Even if the hard line against AI copyrightability remains, some amount of transformation, editing, or tracing makes it eligible. Comic creators will learn not to credit "AI" anymore and clean it up to make it harder to challenge. The Copyright Office will not catch the stuff, and the issue will only matter when someone sues somebody else and it ends up in court.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: George Geef, Ether Being, Donny Cheese and 7 others
I don't understand why these anti AI art people act like picking up art is the easiest thing in the world. a huge money drainer constantly having to buy pens, pencils, paper, sketchbooks etc. Digital art can be expensive as fuck too having to pay for brushes or programs randomly that decided they were going to have a subscription service to use. I have been drawing for a long time and I was only to draw a car that looks like a 3 dimensional car as recent as two years ago (2021). Not everyone has the time to put into learning this skill. Yeah you have a lot of resources' but still.....
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Elim Garak, George Geef, Ether Being and 11 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back