AI Art Seething General

No refunds
Screenshot_20240322-145226.png
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Beanie, N Space, lolcow yoghurt and 20 others
linchan said:
No refunds
View attachment 5840271
Click to expand...
When will dolts learn strikes work only 20% of the time? the big wigs will use ai no matter what and you can do nothing to stop it. I don't mind it, tbh, this was a long time coming and i'm frankly curious what this holds for the future? I know writing took a nosedive but considering AI can produce bias free translations, i'm kinda hopeful. The only concern is whether or not it can generate toxic themes given higher ups' reservation anything that makes us human as of late. You want it to make a porno? you're shit out of luck.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: lolcow yoghurt, Toolbox, George Geef and 7 others
weirdMcGee said:
When will dolts learn strikes work only 20% of the time? the big wigs will use ai no matter what and you can do nothing to stop it. I don't mind it, tbh, this was a long time coming and i'm frankly curious what this holds for the future? I know writing took a nosedive but considering AI can produce bias free translations, i'm kinda hopeful. The only concern is whether or not it can generate toxic themes given higher ups' reservation anything that makes us human as of late. You want it to make a porno? you're shit out of luck.
Click to expand...
But it did work to get residuals which was the reason the strike happened to begin with. People overemphasize the battle against AI during the writer's strike.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: lolcow yoghurt, GunCar Gary, Ether Being and 2 others
linchan said:
People overemphasize the battle against AI during the writer's strike.
Click to expand...
I kind of hate the argument from inevitability but it's right here and generally right about almost any technological innovation that gets retards seething. The development of AI is certainly not an unalloyed good, but neither is it wholly evil, nor (imo) even evil on a cost/benefit analysis.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Toolbox, George Geef, GunCar Gary and 9 others
That push toward developing commercialized AI products is likely a big part of why Mostaque has stepped down. “Not going to beat centralized AI with more centralized AI,” said Mostaque in a post on X, following his resignation. “It is now time to ensure AI remains open and decentralized,” says Mostaque in a separate statement.
Click to expand...
Sounds really promising. Sounds like a gigachad. To be fair, Stability AI has done a lot for the public, acting amicably even in the face of all their shit getting leaked those few years ago, but it is still a for-profit company with mostly proprietary technology. If Mostaque can attract attention and not the least financial resources to set up something akin to Stability AI, but all technology licensed under free licences / open patents, then that would be amazing.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: lolcow yoghurt, Colon capital V, Wright and 8 others
What is hilarious is that GitHub Copilot and other AIs for programming have not made programming obsolete. They just replaced junior developers and diversity hires who did the absolute most basic of shit that was beneath senior developers. Now they are gone, but senior developers remain. Don't let Xitter artists find out this fact, or they will pop an ulcer.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Disagree
Reactions: liam dees, PointOfNoReturnPoint, Ether Being and 11 others
ShooterOfCum said:
What is hilarious is that GitHub Copilot and other AIs for programming have not made programming obsolete. They just replaced junior developers and diversity hires who did the absolute most basic of shit that was beneath senior developers. Now they are gone, but senior developers remain. Don't let Xitter artists find out this fact, or they will pop an ulcer.
Click to expand...
AFAIK, nobody's been replaced by GitHub copilot yet, and I doubt it'll manage to replace anyone in the nearest couple of years.
Especially the diversity hires, since they're hired for their race and not programming skills.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Ether Being, GunCar Gary and ShooterOfCum
gagabobo1997 said:
It's not great, but not particularly bad either
Click to expand...
For being one of the world's first entirely AI-generated short films, it is beyond amazing. Someone already said it in the thread, and I think it is worth repeating: people were also shitting themselves over CGI in films 40-50 years ago. Nowadays, CGI is so good that it is invisible and nobody can, with high confidence, tell you if a shot contains CGI in a modern film or not. These retards are judging this short (it's still completely lobotomised criticism that is not at all valid) as if it were the pinnacle of AI, when it's just getting warmed up. They are in for a rude awakening in 10-20 years' time when they realise their slop is going to be streamlined away.

Big lol at that Xitterer who says "This is the thing that wants to partner with the Hollywood industry? We're so doomed." Yeah, as if to imply that Hollywood doesn't produce flaming dumpster fires on an industrial scale that should not be watched by anyone of sound mind. It's funny because they love slop. They just don't like if the slop is of a wrong brand. They don't want efficient slop, but rather handcrafted slop. OK.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: liam dees, Kaiba Cuqk63, lolcow yoghurt and 22 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back