Anti-ai people really are something else
View attachment 6192771
He had me until he started talking about being a scab.
Wi tha, though, I started to realise why others oppose AI while otherwise being deep in technology; th i similar to Marxist unions protesting against being replaced with machines ince many years ago.
He had another point: AI s not a the point where the finer details, including anatomy, proportion, composition, or even lettering become reliable, especially to an amateur artist.
Honestly, these contradictions also make sense if you see them from a Marxist perspective.
In Marxism, the proletariat are agains the borgeoise. In this case, corporations and the tech bros that suppor those corporations are borgeoise, hence stealing from them is a right. Despite the actual facts, these current-day Marxists think tha they are the proletariat, especially since they claim to suppor tru equality. Under Marxism, tru equality depends on subverting or even outright destroying current institutions and remaking them under truly equal ones. The proletariat is always right. Even if God is dead, the proletariat are the ones with any true meaning, since they provide labour, which is the only true measure of value.
From another standpoint, an oft-repeated piece of art advise is 'draw from life'. Not even Roman statues ar enough.
I am not 100% sure on wha the strawman meant by 'Just learn to code chud! Progress is a good thing!', though. I would talk about machines getting rid of hand-made stuff, bu these tankies barely have a view of history, hence they would not know much about how the assembly line put other hand-workers out of business.
By the by, that 'wholesome' xample... is that not 2Girls1Cup... or Meatspin? If so, then I am surprised that shock sites are still being mentioned in 2022.
