Title: Revisiting Super Mario 64: A Groundbreaking Classic With Troubling Representations
By [Author Name], Time Extension Contributor
When Super Mario 64 launched alongside the Nintendo 64 in 1996, it was hailed as a revolutionary leap forward for 3D gaming. Its fluid controls, inventive level design, and charming worlds set a new standard for platformers and helped define an entire generation of gaming. But as modern audiences revisit this beloved title with a more critical lens, questions arise about some of the game’s dated—and at times troubling—representations.
A Closer Look at Characterization and Stereotypes
While Super Mario 64 was never overtly political in its messaging, certain design choices and character portrayals reflect broader issues in the industry at the time, particularly in how characters are stereotyped and othered. Mario himself, a caricature of an Italian plumber voiced with exaggerated intonations and a cartoonish personality, continues a long tradition of ethnic stereotyping that has been largely unchallenged due to the character’s iconic status.
More subtly, the game presents a world in which certain characters—like the Big Boos or King Bob-omb—speak in stilted, formal, or grammatically awkward English. This stylistic choice, intentional or not, can unintentionally mirror xenophobic tropes of broken English often used to mock or marginalize non-native speakers. It’s a reminder that even playful, fantastical characters can carry deeper cultural implications.
Gender and Body Representation: Lack of Inclusion
Princess Peach is the only female character with a speaking role in the entire game, and her role remains limited to the classic "damsel in distress" trope. Her final line—“Thank you Mario, for rescuing me”—feels especially dated today, reinforcing a lack of agency or identity beyond being an object of the protagonist’s quest.
Even more concerning is the total absence of gender-diverse characters. While the limitations of 1990s game development often led to simplified narratives and character rosters, Super Mario 64 reflects an era in which trans and nonbinary identities were invisible in mainstream media. This lack of representation reinforces the idea that only cisgender, heteronormative stories are worth telling, an issue the gaming industry continues to confront decades later.
Looking Forward: Criticism as a Path to Growth
To be clear, Super Mario 64 is not a game built on malicious intent. Like many cultural artifacts of its time, it reflects the norms and assumptions of the 1990s—many of which are now being questioned or dismantled in the push for greater inclusivity. As conversations around representation in games evolve, it’s important to apply that lens to even the most cherished classics.
Revisiting Super Mario 64 today provides an opportunity not just to celebrate its innovations, but to acknowledge its shortcomings. Doing so doesn't diminish its legacy; rather, it adds necessary depth to our understanding of gaming history and how far we’ve come.
“ to “AI IS GONNA TAKE MY JOB AND MAKE ME OBSOLETE!!!”
