AI girlfriends are ruining an entire generation of men







AI girlfriends are ruining an entire generation of men



BY LIBERTY VITTERT



The rise of virtual artificial intelligence (AI) girlfriends is enabling the silent epidemic of loneliness in an entire generation of young men. It is also having severe consequences for America’s future.



How is something that seems so ridiculous — a virtual AI girlfriend — causing a future crisis among Americans? Well, with millions of users, apps have created virtual girlfriends that talk to you, love you, allow you to live out your erotic fantasies, and learn, through data, exactly what you like and what you don’t like, creating the “perfect” relationship.



These virtual girlfriends can even be based on real people. One influencer created an AI bot of herself named Caryn, then gained over 1,000 users (i.e. real boyfriends) in less than a week and a waitlist of more than 15,000 people.



An AI girlfriend might sound enticing. You get to connect with a super hot girl who listens to you and appreciates you, 24/7. Beyond choosing physical attributes, down to the size of her rear end, you can pick her personality. You prefer “hot, funny, and bold”? That’s what she will be. Or if “cute, shy, and modest” is more your cup of tea, she’s got you covered.



Yes, these are real attributes you can have your AI girlfriend embody. And to be clear, these aren’t cookie-cutter chatbot interactions. By definition, the AI learns from your reactions and is capable of giving you exactly what you want to hear or see, every single time. And they have come at just the right time to assuage the silent epidemic of loneliness that is hitting this generation of young men.



Let’s look at the hard numbers. More than 60 percent of young men (ages 18-30) are single, compared to only 30 percent of women the same age. One in five men report not having a single close friend, a number that has quadrupled in the last 30 years. The amount of social engagement with friends dropped by 20 hours per month over the pandemic and is still decreasing.



These young men are lonely, and it is having real consequences. They are choosing AI girlfriends over real women, meaning they don’t have relationships with real women, don’t marry them and then don’t have and raise babies with them. America desperately needs people to have more babies, but all the signs are pointing toward fewer relationships, fewer marriages and fewer babies. There have been 600,000 fewer births in 2023 in the U.S. relative to 15 years ago. The number of children per woman has decreased by more than 50 percent in the last 60 years.



Put another way, we don’t have enough people to work, and therefore we won’t be able to pay our bills, not just to other countries, but to ourselves. We spent more than $1.6 trillion in 2021 on Medicare and Medicaid, with the number of Americans on Medicare expected to increase by 50 percent by 2030, to more than 80 million people. But over the same period, we will have only 10 million more Americans joining the workforce.



And that is just health care. In 1940, there were 42 workers per beneficiary of Social Security. Today, there are only 2.8 workers per beneficiary, and that number is getting smaller. We are going broke, and the young men who will play a huge role in determining our nation’s future are going there with AI girlfriends in their pockets.



While the concept of an AI girlfriend may seem like a joke, it really isn’t that funny. It is enabling a generation of lonely men to stay lonely and childless, which will have devastating effects on the U.S. economy in less than a decade.
 
I agree with this post on the whole, but you are assuming that most people enter into relationships to find love instead of more banal reasons. Plus, nowadays people don't get married for religious reasons nowadays. They do it for tax benefits.
That's a very Jewish take on it, which is the point of all this: the Subversion of Christian Tradition and Legacy in society.

Maybe faggots and Jews (insert Venn diagram here) do it primarily for tax benefits (and to facilitate faggot adoptions, which is another way they reproduce, it's less risky than out-and-out molesting children) but your average Man/Woman does it for love and family. True, there's financial stability (and other compartments) involved but this is tertiary.

Jews have always argued that marriage is about property, in academic circles. It's Christians that rebelled against such logic, through romantic troubadours and what-not.
 
it can't compete with actual human interaction in a normal and healthy society, but people are becoming increasingly isolated and seem to be forgetting what actual human interaction is.
doesn't matter for high status men, they continue to have plenty of whores and concubines like they always did. probably more, actually.
 
not going to happen. men are not and never will be the limiting factor. men are not the bottleneck for reproduction, women are. a single chad can knock up thousands of women, absolutely no problem. doesn't even need to be in person, sperm banks and IVF exist after all.
the decision to reproduce or not reproduce is firmly in the hands of women, not men. demographics is destiny, and women have unilateral control over it. that's just reality. no amount of blowjob robots is going to change anything in that regard.

Japs are supposedly going extinct in the distant future on their current trajectory and they don't have sci-fi sexbots. How do you think their outlook would change if magically these were created today, and cheap? I don't think it would help.

We have a winner.

Every so often, people freak out over how men outlets to coom without ever making contact with a woman, but it ought to be far, far more concerning how many alternatives women have to satisfy their base desires without doing the hard work of investing in a relationship, getting married, and having children. Japan shows how that works out - Japanese women have the careers & incomes American women do, and on top of that, they aren't fat. And they're just not interested in marriage, and they're even less interested in children.
 
It's not the kind of thing a guy will tell you about because deep down they know it's not something to be openly proud of. Just like they lie about having sex when they're still virgins.

They know having a real woman is better, but most of them are unable to get ina relationship with one for various reasons, so they settle for AI or porn.
Having a "relationship" with an AI chat bot and watching porn are not even close to the same thing. Anyone doing the former unironically is fucking retarded.
 
That's a very Jewish take on it, which is the point of all this: the Subversion of Christian Tradition and Legacy in society.

Maybe faggots and Jews (insert Venn diagram here) do it primarily for tax benefits (and to facilitate faggot adoptions, which is another way they reproduce, it's less risky than out-and-out molesting children) but your average Man/Woman does it for love and family. True, there's financial stability (and other compartments) involved but this is tertiary.

Jews have always argued that marriage is about property, in academic circles. It's Christians that rebelled against such logic, through romantic troubadours and what-not.
That's not really a Jewish or any type of take. It's just the reality of modern secular marriage: it's not a sacrament or something blessed by God to be cherished by the participants. It's essentially extended dating with a contractual basis in the government. That's why divorce is so fucjing rampant and people refuse to cooperate with their spouses.
 
That's not really a Jewish or any type of take. It's just the reality of modern secular marriage: it's not a sacrament or something blessed by God to be cherished by the participlants. It's essentially extended dating with a contractual basis in the government.
It's very Jewish take, no matter how you slice it, academically or historically.
 
That's not really a Jewish or any type of take. It's just the reality of modern secular marriage: it's not a sacrament or something blessed by God to be cherished by the participants. It's essentially extended dating with a contractual basis in the government. That's why divorce is so fucjing rampant and people refuse to cooperate with their spouses.

One of the original, secular purposes of marriage was to ensure that if your husband had a mistress, or fucked a whore, the bastards had zero claim on the the father's resources or any inheritance. Your offspring were entitled; bastards were not. Especially important with royalty for obvious reasons. Oh, and the Greeks were mainly behind that rationale, not the Jews.

A lot would change if unmarried women couldn't claim child support.
 
doesn't matter for high status men, they continue to have plenty of whores and concubines like they always did. probably more, actually.
And the best part is, you don't have to interact with them. There's no necessary small talk, how's your day, etc.

Or so I've heard.
 
These young men are lonely, and it is having real consequences. They are choosing AI girlfriends over real women, meaning they don’t have relationships with real women, don’t marry them and then don’t have and raise babies with them.
That's how you can tell whoever is writing articles about shit like this has no idea what they're talking about. No man in their right mind is choosing ai girlfriends over real women; they're coping with them because they're the best they can get. The amount of men who're choosing ai grilfriends because they're easier than real women, or because they hate actual women, are a small minority compared to the amount of men who're just very lonely and desperately want a coping mechanism. Doubly so because having an ai girlfriend probably has a very high comorbidity with no good friends or social circle either.
So... Where are the women? Lezzing out? Hooked up with guys in a different age group? Trapped in a polygamy cult? That's what I'm not seeing explained in any of these articles, why there is an unavailability of women in that age range but an abundance of men.
Women are more likely to be homosexual than men, but it doesn't entirely explain the wide gap. Neither does the occasional older man and young woman relationship. Studies that track men and woman's relationship status are typically self reported- in other words, there's no common standard for what "being in a relationship" actually is. Thus, a lot of woman are considering texting Chad Thundercock on and off during the week and getting fucked on Saturday to being in relationship, despite Chad doing that with three other woman simultaneously. There aren't as many men who are attractive enough to pull this off, hence the wide discrepancy in young men and woman's relationship statuses. As it turns out, the sexual revolution and dumping of marriage was just bringing polygamy back.

It's easy to say that the only people turning to ai girlfriends or any of this other stuff are just losers who would never get with anyone anyways, but that's not really the case. The amount of men who are terminally sexless and single are just way too high. If more than 60% of men ages 18-30 are single and not having sex than something is wrong with your society. They can't all just be losers.

I think the amount of people who are actually using ai girlfriends is overblown in the interest of fear mongering for clicks, and in most cases it's going to be mostly harmless or not really impact much, but there will be some men (and I guess the occasional woman) who are going to be messed up by this. These things aren't age gated whatsoever, so sometimes a lonely teenager or early twenties person who would otherwise just be a later bloomer or still have time to get their shit together will get hooked on this and torpedo their social development and have actual life experiences pass them by. Similar to taking the blackpill when you're way too young, even it may not exactly be wrong or hurting anyone it's not doing them any favors.
 
women are more likely to be bi than men but men are more likely to be exclusively homosexual than women
Yeah I didn't mean just exclusive homosexuality, I should have been more clear. Women are more likely to do shit with other women than men are to do shit with other men, as far as I'm aware.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pedophobe
Look I agree AI waifu girlfriends are unhealthy, might as well be "married " to a body pillow that talks. That said:

I hate to tell you, but the west is shrinking. Standards of living got way too high. Now no one leaves the house or they're stuck at work. Wanna fix that? Start by not taxing the marrow out of my very bones so I can have some spending money
Leaving the house ain't worth the trouble usually. Get harassed by a bum, a youth, or a some tiktok karen and there's nothing you can do legally. There's no common sense and no consequences anymore.
 
Having a "relationship" with an AI chat bot and watching porn are not even close to the same thing. Anyone doing the former unironically is fucking retarded.
Both fulfill a desire in men. Porn can eeplace the immediate urge for sex, even if it's not as good as the real thing. An AI on the other hand, can fulfill the emotional need for affection and support even if, once again, it's a cheap imitation. I can imagine most of these AI girlfriends sending messages like "I love you" and "do your best". It's very shallow, but it' more than most men get out of real women nowadays.
 
Matchmaking friends/family. Apparently a lot of the moms nagging their kids that they "found someone who would be great for you" and set them up had pretty good matchmaking skills. Ditto for long-time friends setting them up.
It's the erosion of community and atomization that makes these things impossible. For matchmaking, established adults being invested in their own kin and their own community is always a good thing. It's definitely annoying for young people who can manage without it ("omg my auntie is trying to set me up with her friend's nephew, ugh!"), but there are always some decent but awkward men/women who need a little push. Peers can play matchmaker too, but friendships themselves are hard to come by now.

That's not really a Jewish or any type of take. It's just the reality of modern secular marriage: it's not a sacrament or something blessed by God to be cherished by the participants. It's essentially extended dating with a contractual basis in the government. That's why divorce is so fucjing rampant and people refuse to cooperate with their spouses.
People in general don't really "ascend" to thinking that marriage is a SPIRITUAL commitment, which is why so few marriages are successful (even in the past). People used to only cooperate with their spouses out of survival (being dirt poor, passing property onto their kin, etc) or because Sky Daddy threatened them. Granted, the work put into surviving together probably made some of these couples strong, and perhaps they did find love together in the end, but now there's no reason to do all that anymore. And all we're left with is perpetually unhappy people.
 
doesn't matter for high status men, they continue to have plenty of whores and concubines like they always did. probably more, actually.
i'm not saying that chatbots will cause civilization to collapse from lack of families and children or anything like that. some people will always want families and some people will always want human relationships. i'm saying that the current round of incel losers who were already checked out from society and who were already not accomplishing much with their life starting to get hooked on even barely functional current-gen sex chatbots is the canary in the coal mine

the technology will progress, it will start to resemble talking to a real person, and there will come a point where it will become easily accessible on your computer or phone (sometime in the future devices will probably have dedicated AI chips the same way they have dedicated graphics chips). more and more men are already checking out of society and as they have an easy option to get their attention and sex fulfilled from a device in their pocket it will be just one more external motivator that's been removed for them to go out, get a job, find a girl, contribute to society

there isn’t going to be a switch flipped and suddenly all those dumb Staceys are going to be on the curb where they belong, it’ll be just one more way traditional relationships and families are eroded
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Kalsarikännit
I'm just interested in the societal arguments. A Woman wrote an article complaining about Women girlfriend bots. Why do they need to complain? The losers are off their hands now. They'll never be bothered by a socially mal-adjusted loser again.
They may not want to be around the loser but they sure do want his money and a slightly content man that doesn't care about dating is horrifying as they can't bat an eyelash to get simpathy. You are going to see more and more pushback as AI gets more advanced for this reason - women have commodified the fuck out of themselves for the past fifty years and the dating standards ate out of whack. If a man can have genuine emotional support in their pocket then a decent chunk of wanting a relationship dies right there. I'm not going to consider the cooking/cleaning/fucking part as that is still out of reach for a long time and women can easily twist antislavery laws to block that when the time comes. It's not going to be as easy to do that for chatbots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cpt. Stud Beefpile
Granted, the work put into surviving together probably made some of these couples strong, and perhaps they did find love together in the end

Eternal reminder that women are unhappier now than before no-fault divorce. Here's the thing about being married with no choice of divorce. You only, realistically, have two choices:
  1. Live in opposite ends of the house
  2. Stop being cunts to each other and find a way to be happy
Most people prefer (2), because (1) is really no fun at all.
 
Both fulfill a desire in men. Porn can eeplace the immediate urge for sex, even if it's not as good as the real thing. An AI on the other hand, can fulfill the emotional need for affection and support even if, once again, it's a cheap imitation. I can imagine most of these AI girlfriends sending messages like "I love you" and "do your best". It's very shallow, but it' more than most men get out of real women nowadays.
Porn is like sexual junk food. Empty calories, but you're actually being stimulated by real sexual imagery. Even artistic imitations of nudity and sex are playing on that circuitry in a real way.

Talking to a computer that's outputting meaningless words it's been programmed to put out, words that you imbue with meaning, can be fun and kind of uncanny. But taking it seriously and using it as an emotional crutch requires a level of delusion that's not present in porn consumption.

A better analogy would be camgirl and OF simps, not porn. But even that's less pathetic, as pathetic as it is, than guys pretending to be in love with a chat bot. And I need evidence that's a widespread phenomenon at this point. I don't buy it.
 
Back