🐱 All Are Welcome in Middle-Earth.

CatParty




Content warning: Discussions of racism/quotes of racist comments included.

Amazon’s Lord of the Rings series, The Rings of Power, has only even dropped one trailer and a handful of images, and people have already been losing their minds with criticism.

Some of it I empathize with (“Why does Daddy Bezos have to have his hands in everything I love?”). Some of it I could take or leave (“Why don’t the female dwarves have beards?”). And some of it is not only premature, but so needlessly aggressive (“They’re gonna RUIN THE LORE! They’re DESTROYING MY MEMORIES and RUINING MY LIFE”).

And then there’s the racism.​

From the expected “not racist but” comments: “I’m just saying, Tolkien said the elves were fair, it’s not racist to say they should be light-skinned, I’m just going of of the established lore.”

To the anti-diversity comments: “Why do they have to bring woke culture into it? It’s just forced diversity. God, just make your own stories if it’s such a problem!”

To the blatant racism — I’ve unfortunately seen multiple comments saying things along the lines of “Keep Middle-Earth white,” or throwing hate at the non-white actors for having the audacity to take part in the series.

The sad thing is, if you’ve been paying attention to the world we live in — like, even a little bit, just a tiny occasional glimpse while your head is pulled out of the sand for a breath — this doesn’t really surprise you. And if you read any of those comments and go, “Well what’s wrong with those? That’s not racist, they have a point.”…then my friend, you probably have not been pulling your head out of the sand.

And it goes beyond the awful comments (of which, nonetheless, there have been entirely too many). There is an active fight from racists to keep people from speaking out against racism, acknowledging that the racism is happening, or even from being welcoming to non-white fans.

You can’t argue, as many do, that it’s just a “difference of opinion,” when the racists are actively working to silence anyone who welcomes POC to the Lord of the Rings community, but that’s what’s been happening. Notably, one of my favorite TikTok creators has been having videos mass-reported and deleted for weeks for making such controversial statements as, “Everyone is welcome to this fan community, regardless of race, whether as a fan or as an actor/creator.”

Reports of similar things happening to others who make the same kinds of sentiments have come up a few times since.

Listen, I’m a long-time fan of Lord of the Rings.​

It’s been a huge part of my life for over 20 years — since I was only about 11 years old. I still have the replica of The One Ring that got for Christmas in 2002. I care deeply about the lore, have read the books every couple years since middle school, have read The Silmarillion multiple times, and own several books about the history, architecture, weapons, cultures, and languages of Middle-Earth.

And any way you cut it — from a fandom perspective, a lore perspective, a “true to the source material” perspective , etc.— there is no excuse for this racism, this adamant resistance to allowing people who aren’t white to see themselves reflected in one of the most influential fantasy worlds in film and literature.

The lore doesn’t justify the racism. And even if it did, that doesn’t mean we as fans should too.​

We have to be willing to criticize the things we love.

I don’t think any of us would disagree that Middle-Earth is beautiful. Its history is rich; its languages impressive; its geography vast and varied. It is full of music, magic, adventure. It’s a place that feels like home, where even in the darkest times, we know that good will triumph. Where even when victory doesn’t feel like we expected, and the future is complicated and uncertain, there’s still joy and light and comfort.

That does not exempt that world from criticism.

The Lord of the Rings wasn’t perfect. It wasn’t fully representative. Hell, there were hardly any women in it, and that’s been a source of criticism for at least as long as I’ve been a fan, and almost certainly longer. Sometimes the omissions of Lord of the Rings are obvious.

That isn’t an excuse to stand by them. It’s all the more reason to expand the world, to keep building on what we love and sharing it with others.

It’s not forced diversity. It’s looking at the world around you — the very real world full of very real people — and recognizing that every single person in it deserves to have a place that feels like home the way Middle-Earth does for many of us.

Maybe some people are right. Maybe a case could be made that people of color simply did not exist in Tolkien’s original vision of Middle-Earth. It’s unlikely, but let’s roll with that for a minute.

We have carried our love of these books, films, fandoms, and communities for decades. We have shared it with our loved ones, with the next generation. We as fans have made it a world that endures through the changes of our own by forwarding its themes of perseverance, compassion, and a determination to heal the world — themes as old and immortal as the Elves.

It doesn’t matter what the racial demographic of Middle-Earth was. The author wasn’t perfect. There, I said it. So while the “purity of the lore” argument is flimsy at best, it’s also not something the fans should cling to in defiance of the core themes of the story that are as relevant as ever. There’s no room for gatekeeping, especially rooted in racism.

Whether as fans or actors or something else; whether to enjoy the story, to add to it, to make art about it, or even to take part in it; everyone has a seat at the table — for breakfast, second breakfast, elevensies, luncheon, afternoon tea, dinner, and supper, if they want it.
 
Good luck finding a novel by a brown person---
It's worse than that these days. They're artificially boosting colored authors regardless of merit, because the publishers want their profit. N.K. Jemisin is the most prominent and worst example of this. They know black authors have a harder time selling and often aren't very good, so they've taken to using white guilt to get people to buy trash. And she has the gall to call everyone and everything racist.
 
Like I’ve said, I’m fine with whatever as long as they respect the book’s Christian roots.
They want the story to reflect the world today. What does Christianity look like today? Bugman Christianity (Reformed Church of Soy), the kind these people know about and might even admire?

Hang on, I've got Day's Tolkien Bestiary, and I've never heard of his notoriety. Can you give a summary?
No, I can't, because I don't really understand it myself. I only know some vocal fans hate him because he makes minor extrapolations without saying "ATTENTION: THIS PART IS NOT DIRECTLY FROM TOLKIEN." I'm a grumpy old book purist but I think a little bit of extrapolation is fine. I've got the Bestiary somewhere and never noticed anything really wrong in it. Bestiaries are supposed to be full of fantastical nonsense anyway.

Oh, and the lung map. They hate this map he did that shows Aman and Middle-earth as mirrored lobes like a pair of lungs. To me, it looks like any medieval or early modern world map that doesn't get the continents quite right. I thought that was the intent. But nerds see it and they explode. "WHY DOESN'T THIS LOOK JUST LIKE THE NAPKIN SKETCH OF ARDA THAT WAS PUBLISHED IN HISTORY OF MIDDLE-EARTH VOLUME FOUR?!?" I dunno, maybe because that was published eight years after Day drew his map?

Publishers have recently cut up his work into multiple smaller books and give them names like "An Atlas of Tolkien," "Battles of Tolkien," etc. That's annoying and a little deceptive, since they are reprinting old material under new names, but hardly the author's fault.

I guess I don't care about these things because I don't take secondary material very seriously. It's just something fun to look at when you're on the toilet but you don't want to run down your phone's battery. And I think Day's critics can be a little hypocritical. I mean, a lot of them are fine with Peter Jackson's movies.
 
Martin was going for something with a historical bent but he wasn’t initially. Previously he said that in fantasy everything should be bigger. In that regard, his works are arguably higher fantasy than Middle Earth in the third age.

Eh it’s a copypasta now I guess.
You're probably right, but its one of those canned responses that's so fucking cringe that when I see it, it makes me think less of the poster for having to post it.

"Lol Aragorn didn't think of immigration did he?"
Not that kind of story dumb ass.

GRRM and GoT also arguably only are specifically good at showing the immediate effects of political decision making. They're not nearly as well thought out as something like The Expanse that shows the results of policies over decades as well as the results of immediate decisions.
 
You're probably right, but its one of those canned responses that's so fucking cringe that when I see it, it makes me think less of the poster for having to post it.

"Lol Aragorn didn't think of immigration did he?"
Not that kind of story dumb ass.

GRRM and GoT also arguably only are specifically good at showing the immediate effects of political decision making. They're not nearly as well thought out as something like The Expanse that shows the results of policies over decades as well as the results of immediate decisions.
I agree. GoT’s world building isn’t as good as it’s hyped to be. As you mentioned the Expanse builds around decades of policies, culture, and science.

Martin is more about immediate cause and effect but even then he sometimes falls short. Someone else mentioned this in another thread that he probably thinks of vivid scenes then writes to interconnect them. I agree with this conclusion.

I feel that Martin’s greatest strength is building sympathy for characters that would be just side characters or the big bad in other stories. However, Martin is not a historian or geographer. His map is weird and the way the characters think is more akin to someone from our world than a feudalistic one. For example the Dothraki hate shepherds and they’re shown as being weak, but historically nomadic people are shepherds. The Mongols and Comanche didn’t just ride horses, they herded a bunch of animals. It’s a more modern idea that shepherds are meek pushovers. There are plenty of other examples. But that’s my favorite nitpick as an armchair historian.
 
View attachment 3041944
Why is it always the whitest of white people that write this kind of garbage?
Wrong. That's not a person, but I don't know what it is. Probably some foul snaga judging by its facial structure.
It’s a more modern idea that shepherds are meek pushovers. There are plenty of other examples.
Yeah, pretty sure Goliath regretted mocking that shepherd boy. AND LET ME TELL YOU ABOUT THE BALEARIC ISLANDERS. Bunch of broke-ass sheepfuckers with barely a thong for clothing and yet everyone wanted them for their rock-chucking skills.
 
Back