EU All for one: box-office debacle for the woke, feminist version of The Three Musketeers

L - A (translated with DeepL)
67eabf5a1c9b07a49be0f3999ace5e9ceba6388b50f13756205dcf4e8c4b4f14.jpg

Director Houda Benyamina's adaptation of Alexandre Dumas's novel, in which the musketeers are women, totals just 9407 admissions in five days, and fails to break into the top 30 films of the last week.

“Toutes pour une is as necessary as inclusive writing”. That's how Éric Neuhoff, film critic at Le Figaro, described Houda Benyamina's latest film, in theaters since January 23. In this umpteenth adaptation of Alexandre Dumas' Three Musketeers, the director of Divines (2016) blows the stereotypical masculinity of d'Artagnan, Athos, Portos and Aramis to smithereens. In their place, we discover new heroines: Oulaya Amamra, Sabrina Ouazani, Déborah Lukumuena and Daphne Patakia.

The script is based on the 1961, 1973, 1989, 1993 and 2001 adaptations, and of course on the last two from 2023, starring François Civil, Vincent Cassel and Louis Garrel. “There are always three of them, charged with protecting the queen. They are joined by an escaped Morisco, whom they adopt and who becomes their D'Artagnan. That's the job,” sums up Éric Neuhoff. A single (and immense) detail makes all the difference: Anne of Austria's three protectors have to disguise themselves as men to accomplish their exploits. Chest bandages, false beards glued to the chin, fake moustaches, wigs... This debauchery of hairpieces and make-up will enable them to join the glorious company of King Louis the Thirteenth's musketeers.

Disastrous box-office debut

This (original?) idea doesn't seem to have had the desired effect on critics and, today, the general public. Éric Neuhoff, for one, doesn't seem to have enjoyed this very 21st-century retelling of Dumas père's work: “The film flounders, doesn't know which way to dance, hesitates between spaghetti western and vaguely feminist pamphlet, sequences assembled in a hurry and pieces that claim to be bravura, all sprinkled with Anglo-Saxon songs that arrive like hair on the soup.

The general public could have contradicted the critics. But the initial, often cruel, attendance figures didn't save our feminized duelists either. In its first five days of release, Toutes pour une attracted just 9,407 admissions on 155 screens. Enough to deprive it of a place in the top 30 of the French box-office this week, even though its production required no less than 10 million euros of investment.

But that's not all. At the end of its first day of release in France, The Three Musketeers with Woke Sauce only managed 1271 admissions over 564 screenings, an unflattering average of two spectators per screening. By way of comparison, Jouer avec le feu starring Vincent Lindon, released on the same day, attracted 20,252 spectators in one day. That's twenty times more than its projected budget of 4.5 million euros.

Allociné withdraws film's audience ratings

And as if the attendance figures weren't enough to make Toutes pour une one of France's biggest flops of recent years, another misfortune has consigned to cinematic oblivion what is already shaping up to be a resounding failure. “Due to an abnormally high influx of extreme ratings (0.5 or 5) and new user accounts, we have taken the exceptional decision to temporarily suspend the display of the film's spectator rating”, announced Allociné on its site. An extremely rare occurrence. As rare as seeing a Vicomtesse de Bragelonne...

Allociné associates this “vote manipulation” with the opinions shared on social networks. X (formerly twitter) has indeed become a playground for the many Internet users who pour out their hatred in negative comments. Unsurprisingly, most of these detractors attack the film's supposed “wokism”. However, the abundance of 0/5 stars was offset by a number of laudatory comments giving the film top marks. At Le Figaro, our critic Éric Neuhoff gave the film a 0/4 point.



GiVBl6XWMAExCwc.jpg
 
Historic french comedy remake about 4 men.
Searching....
Men: 0. French: 0.

If they made a raunchy comedy with 4 actually pretty french women, this would have been a niche but fun romp for catladies.

But even those can't turn out for the 500 kilo sheboon.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Vecr and Monolith
It makes zero sense how this would even work with the source material and the time period where the story takes place and the premise sounds fucking retarded.

The Three Musketeers has good female characters as well, especially the villain, so there is zero point in gender swapping the protagonists.

These people are allergic to making an original story and instead have to put out complete shit that nobody will watch raping the source material while they do it. They somehow got 10 million euros to make this garbage.
 
Reading the mainstream reviews, it doesn't seem like an adaption of the three musketeers. It just seems to be a chase film where three women and their muslim friend from spain try to save the queen. The reviews suggests its full of pooner stuff for some reason. Including women making fake dicks and women learning to pee standing.

A female version of the three musketeers isn't difficult to pull off. But doing a version to appeal specifically to pooners was totally insane.
 
Even woke retards won't watch this shit, why do they pretend they like it?
 
If they made a raunchy comedy with 4 actually pretty french women, this would have been a niche but fun romp for catladies.
A scenario popped into my head when I first read about this... Have a title be "The Secret Musketeers"... Have all the characters be court ladies who are secretly spies/assassins to protect the king/queen. Have the normal plot of the Three Musketeers in the background, while the women in the film poison, blackmail, and/or defensetrate people to ensure that messages that would've sank the Musketeer's goals are diverted or lost. Add a wink and a nod to various well known version of the Three Musketeers films, and I bet it would've been an excellent romp.

Alas, that's far too fun for modern audiences.
 
I threw up trying to read the article. Anyone who took part in the desecration one of Dumas' finest works needs to be drawn and quartered.
 
I see the frogs forgot to tick a box. No trans Muslim Lesbian Pakistani rocket scientist with one arm, dyslexia, vitiligo and fibro? Tsk tsk. Do 👏 better 👏 chuds 👏!

Seriously though, films like this deserve to fail because they have no real merit.
 
I remember a time where French cinema really pushed the envelope and tried to be unique. Movies like La Haine, Le Misanthrope (Must Watch btw), Irreversible, the whole Kino Controverse catalogue. All amazing experiences that you'll never be able to get anywhere else. Movies that had something to say and made you think about stuff.

Lol, and now this shit. Nothing is safe from this mindrot. You just have to laugh at this point
:story:
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Vecr and Azovka
It makes zero sense how this would even work with the source material and the time period where the story takes place and the premise sounds fucking retarded.
These types don't care if it makes sense. They want to flick their beans to people on screen that look just. Like. THEM. Because that's how they get their gratification.

That's what the whinge about representation is about. It doesn't matter if it makes sense. It doesn't matter if it's logical, or accurate. It only matters that someway, somehow, someone bent over backwards to fill their egos, bereft of love from their parents, by putting someone in front of them that looks like them.

I swear, every time someone out there bleats about representation in the media, we need to start, en masse replying with, "Your parents didn't love you and that's why you need people in the movies to look like you. Because that's all the worth your sad little existence can manage: someone on the screen looks like me, so I am good. You are pathetic and you will die having accomplished nothing."
 
Was that burlap sack of dark matter Huell from Breaking Bad?

It's nice he's getting roles.
 
Have the normal plot of the Three Musketeers in the background, while the women in the film poison, blackmail, and/or defensetrate people to ensure that messages that would've sank the Musketeer's goals are diverted or lost.
This could actually work, the rosenkranz and gildernstern approach. It could be funny.
Nothings funny any more is it? Why can’t we have fun films? Rhetorical question, I know why
 
Back