Disaster America's fight to save handwriting from extinction as IQs begin to fall for first time ever - and teachers warn some 20-year-olds can't sign checks anymore

  • Americans reported they hadn't written a note or personal letter in five years
  • People are having a hard time reading their own and others' handwriting
  • Studies show writing can increase the brain's cognitive abilities

Several US states are trying to prevent handwriting from going extinct as classrooms increasingly swap pen and paper for tablets and computers.

The US government removed the skill from the core curriculum in 2010 due to claims it was time consuming and would not be useful in the age of technology which meant schools could instead focus on typing classes.

Handwriting is considered a fine motor skill that stimulates and challenges the brain, but with schools turning to technology instead, some teachers are complaining students can barely hold a pencil but can swipe and double-click on their devices.

Students with learning disabilities like dysgraphia - when children can read but have trouble writing letters - can also be affected because methods of overcoming the disability requires them to practice writing by hand.

Previous studies have revealed that IQ scores have dropped for the first time in a century and indicated that technology could be to blame.

Teachers, parents and experts who DailyMail.com spoke to said they were seeing kids and young adults who don't know how to sign their name or read cursive.

Experts have urged schools to re-introduce cursive into the curriculum, citing the need to understand historical documents. Pictured: Cursive written before it was removed from the common core standard in 2010

New legislative bills have been passed in states like California and New York requiring students aged six to 12 years old to learn cursive writing, but others are still advancing in state legislature while some are still hesitant to revert back including Colorado, New Mexico and Nevada.

'I wish [students] would learn how to write in cursive,' Tracy Bendish, an ABA autism therapist for Jefferson Public Schools told DailyMail.com.

'But it is like the telephone on the wall,' she said. 'Less and less used and then not there anymore.'

There is a big educational disparity between schools that readily have access to gadgets versus those that don't, causing what's called the digital divide.

Students who have better access to technology will have better educational success than those who don't, which is particularly concerning as more teachers turn to technology in their courses.

'The digital divide has affected individual students in the same school as well as groups of students across districts, lowering the academic outcomes of low-income, underserved students and districts,' according to American University.

Last year, researchers at the University of Oregon and Northwestern reported that IQ scores had dropped because technology shortens attention spans and decreases the need to think deeply.

Experts have been urging governments and school administrators to bring handwriting back to schools, citing sixth graders who have trouble holding a pencil but can use digital devices with ease.

Dr. Lori Koerner, the assistant superintendent for the Riverhead Central School District in New York, told DailyMail.com that it is essential for elementary and middle schoolers to be taught cursive.

'Though technology has its benefits, children need to be able to read cursive in the event a document is presented to them along their journey.

'They most certainly, at the very least, need to know how to sign their name,' Koerner said.

'I have encountered too many secondary students and employment candidates who cannot sign documents relative to their onboarding process.'

Teachers and coworkers continue to struggle with ineligible handwriting, and a 2021 survey conducted by OnePoll on behalf of Bic USA Inc. found that 45 percent of Americans struggle to read their own handwriting while a shocking 70 percent reported that they have trouble reading notes or reports from their coworkers.

Some people have expressed similar views, saying that signing important documents will become a stressful practice without the ability to write cursive.

'My 20 year-old-granddaughter struggles to sign a check,' said Kimberly Jacovino of Monroe, Connecticut.

'It is very important and should be brought back to all schools,' she added.

In the wake of turning to keyboarding instead of writing by hand, educators found students' IQ levels are shrinking and placed the blame on technology in the classroom, Psychology Today reported.

Hetty Roessingh, a professor emerita of education at the University of Calgary echoed this sentiment, saying that five-year-olds are not meeting academic benchmarks because of the accessibility of digital devices.

Roessingh has long advocated for schools to push handwriting and cursive on children because it is an important tool to engage the hand-brain complex and circuitry that induces memory and retrieving information that typing simply doesn't do.

A new study published in February by researchers at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) found that handwriting is linked to increased cognitive brain function, motor skills and memory.

'It is important to realize that the brain follows the principle of 'use it or lose it,' said Audrey van der Meer, the study's lead author and neuropsychology professor at the NTNU.

'When writing by hand, most of the brain is active,' she continued.

'This requires the brain to communicate between its active parts which, in turn, puts the brain in a state that helps both children and adults learn more and remember better,' van der Meer said.

Schools stopped teaching cursive in 2010 when most US states adopted what's called Common Core State Standards, which set benchmarks for reading and math but didn't include cursive as part of the recommended curriculum.

At the time, critics said teaching efforts would be better spent on developing new skills like coding and keyboarding while others called the writing style 'old fashioned.'

When dropping cursive from common core, lawmakers argued that cursive was time-consuming and wouldn't be as useful as other skills like typing, that students would need at they moved on to junior and high school,' a then-spokesperson for Georgia Department of Education told ABC News at the time.

Cursive also wasn't on the tests that ranked schools under the No Child Left Behind Law which was put in place by the Bush Administration in 2002 and ended in 2015.

Schools would typically gear their learning curriculum around what was required under the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) which set benchmarks for academic performance that all schools had to meet.

If they continuously failed to meet the NCLB standards, the state had the right to change the school's leadership team or even close the school.

Forty-one states adopted the common core curriculum and while individually they were able to choose to teach cursive, California and Massachusetts were among the few states to opt in.

Roughly six years later, 14 states reintroduced the writing style into all classes, and by 2019, that number grew to 20 states.

Democratic assemblywoman Sharon Quirk-Silva introduced a bill in California last year, citing the need for students to not only be able to write in cursive but to read it as well.

The California bill will go into effect for the upcoming 2024-2025 school year but similar bills are still pending in states like Kentucky where, if it's passed, would be implemented in the 2025-2026 academic year.

The push is also in response to the ever-increasing artificial intelligence technology, which Quirk-Silva believed will cause teachers to return to handwritten essay exams necessitating students' ability to write in cursive because it is faster than print.

If handwriting becomes extinct, it would be a major loss to understanding history or connecting with our past, Roessingh said.

'It is about the embodied cognition and the circuitry behind personal messages that are beneficial both for the person who wrote it and the person who read it,' she said.

Handwriting, particularly cursive, presents the idea of what's called embodied cognition, meaning it acts as a switch to lock in your memory.

This makes it increasingly important for kids to write by hand and learn cursive because they are 'essentially tactile and sensory beings who take in the world through engagement,' Roessingh explained.

More than that, a piece of history could be lost to younger generations who aren't taught to read and write cursive, leaving them unable to read major historical documents like the diary of Anne Franke, the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Chelsea Hayes, a Maryland mom, said regardless of what schools decide, she plans on making sure her three-year-old daughter knows how to write in cursive when she gets older.

'I do think it's important. Not just for historical purposes, but also just as a skill. I think it's almost like learning another language,' Hayes said.

'You don't teach kids art or music because of history, though I guess there's a historical component you can put in there.

'It's just another skill I think she should have. If she never uses it, oh well. If she does, great.'

Read more:
 
It's always been an annoying pain in the ass to read. I specifically remember family gatherings with old people who'd been exposed to handwriting all their lives passing pages around trying to figure out what in the living fuck was being conveyed in some old letter somebody wrote.

The whole cursive thing borders on fetishistic.
Part of that may also be that the different types of handwriting change periodically as some genius educator decides he knows a better way to write letters and that is the way they must be taught. So if a letter's shape is changed and that is what a person is used to reading his whole life, then looking at old letters with different forms will be more difficult. Spenserian gave way to the Palmer Method which gave way to Zaner-Bloser which gave way to D'Nealian, all in the space of a century.
 
nah it's real, people are offloading reasoning and comprehension to google. They have no fluid intelligence anymore.
(X)
There's a difference between being "smart" and "intelligent".
A dumbass with <90 IQ can have stellar reading comprehension and a good attention span if they apply themselves. Intelligence, on the other hand, is set in stone and is mostly genetic. You can't make your IQ higher by reading lol
 
Why is every denialist boomer's first line of cope to blame technology?
It's not just boomers. People blame technology because it's easier than accepting that it's a problem on the societal scale with our culture. Just like how it's easier to blame schools for kids being stupid as fuck rather than accept that we have a nation filled with parents who are as retarded, incurious, and divested from the pursuit of critical thinking and knowledge as their spawn.

That said the point of learning to read and write in cursive died with the invention of the ballpoint pen. Unless we start using inkwells and feathers again the only use-case for it is RX notes in illegible chicken-scratch from doctors.
 
'I wish [students] would learn how to write in cursive,' Tracy Bendish, an ABA autism therapist for Jefferson Public Schools told DailyMail.com.
My handwriting has always been painfully bad, writing in cursive had done nothing but make what I am writing almost illegible.

The moment I stopped doing that was the moment I could actually read what I wrote without trying too hard by using context and memory.

Fuck you whoever told me to do cursive, I hope you rot in hell.
 
Checks will probably go away before physical currency since the younger generations are more likely using credit cards and apps to pay for things.
I still occasionally write checks for things that I want a paper trail on. Again, I just print, because as long as it's legible nobody gives a shit.
 
What's wrong with handwriting in print? Other than for your signature (which, in most people's cases, is already a barely-legible scribble only faintly reminiscent of script), I see no point in cursive.

Should we go back to using f's for s's?

Fneed'f feed and feed
Formerly Chuck'f
You basically had to be able to write in cursive, and specifically write in cursive in the right way with correctly placed upstrokes and downstrokes, if you were using an ink dip pen or fountain pen. If you try to write with one of those without the right technique, there's a strong chance you'll end up getting ink all over the page or fucking up the nib.
That's no longer a concern now ballpoint pens are completely standard (I remember being told that I had to get better at fountain pens, because professional people never used biro). In theory you should still be able to write faster in cursive than in print, but that's not universal for everyone (personally I do find it easier to scribble something down on the phone if I'm using cursive). If you were writing out a long essay in one sitting, then cursive should make your hand hurt less than print, but that's definitely something that's pretty much exclusively done on computer now. The article does raise the valid point that teaching kids joined up handwriting improves their fine motor skills, which is something kids need more support with these days (as they're generally playing with tablets rather than colouring in/doing crafts), so I think that's probably an argument for keeping it around.
 
It's always been an annoying pain in the ass to read. I specifically remember family gatherings with old people who'd been exposed to handwriting all their lives passing pages around trying to figure out what in the living fuck was being conveyed in some old letter somebody wrote.

The whole cursive thing borders on fetishistic.
What constitution? This old document? No it doesn’t say that. No it doesn’t - can you read it, pleb? No, let us translate it for you…

We lose a lot of history if no one can read older script. The idiots in charge decided bong school kids would no longer learn English grammar while I was at school, so we didn’t. Not too much of an immediate problem u til you come to learn other languages and they start going on about the infinitive and nobody has a clue.
We should teach it, reading and writing and then if kids prefer to print neatly when older that’s up to them
 
Yes, as we all know, writing in cursive raises your IQ just like watching Rick and Morty!
Not to say it isn't useful, but this is just people bitching instead of addressing the real issue which is how educational standards and practices are bottom of the barrel.
Teachers are now too incompetent to teach kids, and blame their incompetence on the fact they do not receive blank checks to do their jobs.
 
We lose a lot of history if no one can read older script.
The whole point is that nobody can read it anyway because handwriting is difficult to read, even among people who've been taught to read it and have had to do so for decades. The problem is not as much the teaching of the skill as the fact that it's inherently a shitty way to store and communicate language.

We did it because there was no superior alternative, not because it's particularly good.
 
The insistence that cursive be taught is strange. However, it’s well known that handwriting notes retains information far better than just reading it on a screen. We all know this. The issue is that 90% of schoolwork is done only on laptops and tablets. Even if a student wanted to write, they can’t turn anything in that way. Testing is online, lessons are online, any “notes” taken are online. They stare at screens nonstop. Anyone who’s had to sit through a boring Power Point knows your brain just turns off after a while.

Learning to write legibly, no matter what style you’re using, is very important for refined motor skills in younger children. Is technology the problem? Yes. Because tech companies like Google have flooded schools with devices and inevitably those are used for everything. I also believe that when they talk about the gap between schools that can afford technology and those that can’t, it has nothing to do with technology itself. Those schools would be behind regardless because they’re poor. They probably don’t have a lot of extracurricular options either.

But ffs, cursive isn’t going to solve the fucking problem.
 
There's a difference between being "smart" and "intelligent".
A dumbass with <90 IQ can have stellar reading comprehension and a good attention span if they apply themselves. Intelligence, on the other hand, is set in stone and is mostly genetic. You can't make your IQ higher by reading lol
What you're describing as intelligence is fluid intelligence that can change dramatically in childhood/adolescence, you're right in that it's not something that can be taught or learned but it is like a muscle it needs to be used or it will atrophy.
 
Forcibly import the low-IQ, violent, Turd World into your nation... and be shocked that national "intellect" drops. Wew...
Pure niggercattle I say
Niggercattle using nigger technology. To quote that one nigger show, "Nigger technology is just something that allows dumb niggers to talk to other dumb niggers about dumb nigger shit."
 
Should we go back to using f's for s's?

Fneed'f feed and feed
Formerly Chuck'f
The reason we used 'f' s for 's' s is due to the medial, or long 's' which looked like this: ſ

Certain printing presses didn't have the long form 's' so the closest substitute was the 'f'. Same with the letter 'thorn' and 'y'.
 
I have never once seen anyone in the real world care about how a signature is written. It can be written in perfect calligraphy, illegible scribbles, or 15th century blackletter script. It does not matter in the slightest. Op eds on cursive education are the only place where it is ever mentioned.
 
I dunno, I highly doubt cursive has anything to do with IQ outside of the basic fact anything is harder to learn if your IQ is lower. I remember learning it in like 5th grade and while I still know how to do it I pretty much only do it for checks and nothing else. Even if you can't write cursive it's silly to think it'd be hard to read it - outside of a few cases like the lower case r it's just an ornate version of the regular English alphabet. Heck, it's so similar that any adult would probably be able to learn it by watching a 20 minute YouTube video, the only reason it's any problem for children is their stupid undeveloped brains.
 
Back