Disaster America's fight to save handwriting from extinction as IQs begin to fall for first time ever - and teachers warn some 20-year-olds can't sign checks anymore

  • Americans reported they hadn't written a note or personal letter in five years
  • People are having a hard time reading their own and others' handwriting
  • Studies show writing can increase the brain's cognitive abilities

Several US states are trying to prevent handwriting from going extinct as classrooms increasingly swap pen and paper for tablets and computers.

The US government removed the skill from the core curriculum in 2010 due to claims it was time consuming and would not be useful in the age of technology which meant schools could instead focus on typing classes.

Handwriting is considered a fine motor skill that stimulates and challenges the brain, but with schools turning to technology instead, some teachers are complaining students can barely hold a pencil but can swipe and double-click on their devices.

Students with learning disabilities like dysgraphia - when children can read but have trouble writing letters - can also be affected because methods of overcoming the disability requires them to practice writing by hand.

Previous studies have revealed that IQ scores have dropped for the first time in a century and indicated that technology could be to blame.

Teachers, parents and experts who DailyMail.com spoke to said they were seeing kids and young adults who don't know how to sign their name or read cursive.

Experts have urged schools to re-introduce cursive into the curriculum, citing the need to understand historical documents. Pictured: Cursive written before it was removed from the common core standard in 2010

New legislative bills have been passed in states like California and New York requiring students aged six to 12 years old to learn cursive writing, but others are still advancing in state legislature while some are still hesitant to revert back including Colorado, New Mexico and Nevada.

'I wish [students] would learn how to write in cursive,' Tracy Bendish, an ABA autism therapist for Jefferson Public Schools told DailyMail.com.

'But it is like the telephone on the wall,' she said. 'Less and less used and then not there anymore.'

There is a big educational disparity between schools that readily have access to gadgets versus those that don't, causing what's called the digital divide.

Students who have better access to technology will have better educational success than those who don't, which is particularly concerning as more teachers turn to technology in their courses.

'The digital divide has affected individual students in the same school as well as groups of students across districts, lowering the academic outcomes of low-income, underserved students and districts,' according to American University.

Last year, researchers at the University of Oregon and Northwestern reported that IQ scores had dropped because technology shortens attention spans and decreases the need to think deeply.

Experts have been urging governments and school administrators to bring handwriting back to schools, citing sixth graders who have trouble holding a pencil but can use digital devices with ease.

Dr. Lori Koerner, the assistant superintendent for the Riverhead Central School District in New York, told DailyMail.com that it is essential for elementary and middle schoolers to be taught cursive.

'Though technology has its benefits, children need to be able to read cursive in the event a document is presented to them along their journey.

'They most certainly, at the very least, need to know how to sign their name,' Koerner said.

'I have encountered too many secondary students and employment candidates who cannot sign documents relative to their onboarding process.'

Teachers and coworkers continue to struggle with ineligible handwriting, and a 2021 survey conducted by OnePoll on behalf of Bic USA Inc. found that 45 percent of Americans struggle to read their own handwriting while a shocking 70 percent reported that they have trouble reading notes or reports from their coworkers.

Some people have expressed similar views, saying that signing important documents will become a stressful practice without the ability to write cursive.

'My 20 year-old-granddaughter struggles to sign a check,' said Kimberly Jacovino of Monroe, Connecticut.

'It is very important and should be brought back to all schools,' she added.

In the wake of turning to keyboarding instead of writing by hand, educators found students' IQ levels are shrinking and placed the blame on technology in the classroom, Psychology Today reported.

Hetty Roessingh, a professor emerita of education at the University of Calgary echoed this sentiment, saying that five-year-olds are not meeting academic benchmarks because of the accessibility of digital devices.

Roessingh has long advocated for schools to push handwriting and cursive on children because it is an important tool to engage the hand-brain complex and circuitry that induces memory and retrieving information that typing simply doesn't do.

A new study published in February by researchers at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) found that handwriting is linked to increased cognitive brain function, motor skills and memory.

'It is important to realize that the brain follows the principle of 'use it or lose it,' said Audrey van der Meer, the study's lead author and neuropsychology professor at the NTNU.

'When writing by hand, most of the brain is active,' she continued.

'This requires the brain to communicate between its active parts which, in turn, puts the brain in a state that helps both children and adults learn more and remember better,' van der Meer said.

Schools stopped teaching cursive in 2010 when most US states adopted what's called Common Core State Standards, which set benchmarks for reading and math but didn't include cursive as part of the recommended curriculum.

At the time, critics said teaching efforts would be better spent on developing new skills like coding and keyboarding while others called the writing style 'old fashioned.'

When dropping cursive from common core, lawmakers argued that cursive was time-consuming and wouldn't be as useful as other skills like typing, that students would need at they moved on to junior and high school,' a then-spokesperson for Georgia Department of Education told ABC News at the time.

Cursive also wasn't on the tests that ranked schools under the No Child Left Behind Law which was put in place by the Bush Administration in 2002 and ended in 2015.

Schools would typically gear their learning curriculum around what was required under the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) which set benchmarks for academic performance that all schools had to meet.

If they continuously failed to meet the NCLB standards, the state had the right to change the school's leadership team or even close the school.

Forty-one states adopted the common core curriculum and while individually they were able to choose to teach cursive, California and Massachusetts were among the few states to opt in.

Roughly six years later, 14 states reintroduced the writing style into all classes, and by 2019, that number grew to 20 states.

Democratic assemblywoman Sharon Quirk-Silva introduced a bill in California last year, citing the need for students to not only be able to write in cursive but to read it as well.

The California bill will go into effect for the upcoming 2024-2025 school year but similar bills are still pending in states like Kentucky where, if it's passed, would be implemented in the 2025-2026 academic year.

The push is also in response to the ever-increasing artificial intelligence technology, which Quirk-Silva believed will cause teachers to return to handwritten essay exams necessitating students' ability to write in cursive because it is faster than print.

If handwriting becomes extinct, it would be a major loss to understanding history or connecting with our past, Roessingh said.

'It is about the embodied cognition and the circuitry behind personal messages that are beneficial both for the person who wrote it and the person who read it,' she said.

Handwriting, particularly cursive, presents the idea of what's called embodied cognition, meaning it acts as a switch to lock in your memory.

This makes it increasingly important for kids to write by hand and learn cursive because they are 'essentially tactile and sensory beings who take in the world through engagement,' Roessingh explained.

More than that, a piece of history could be lost to younger generations who aren't taught to read and write cursive, leaving them unable to read major historical documents like the diary of Anne Franke, the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Chelsea Hayes, a Maryland mom, said regardless of what schools decide, she plans on making sure her three-year-old daughter knows how to write in cursive when she gets older.

'I do think it's important. Not just for historical purposes, but also just as a skill. I think it's almost like learning another language,' Hayes said.

'You don't teach kids art or music because of history, though I guess there's a historical component you can put in there.

'It's just another skill I think she should have. If she never uses it, oh well. If she does, great.'

Read more:
 
Most people's cursive is illegible chicken scratch. I went to school back when it was taught regularly and I can't read a lot of it mainly because of how badly people wrote it. Unformed letters, n's that look like m's, log lines instead of actual letters ect... Printing is good enough. It's much easier to read even when someone had bad hand writing.
I do the doctor style "Big letter, smushline, repeat" signature after having to do hourly forms for years.
 
It's not just boomers. People blame technology because it's easier than accepting that it's a problem on the societal scale with our culture. Just like how it's easier to blame schools for kids being stupid as fuck rather than accept that we have a nation filled with parents who are as retarded, incurious, and divested from the pursuit of critical thinking and knowledge as their spawn.

That said the point of learning to read and write in cursive died with the invention of the ballpoint pen. Unless we start using inkwells and feathers again the only use-case for it is RX notes in illegible chicken-scratch from doctors.
If it's not a problem then why do most of the children of the tech giants and CEOs send their kids to schools that still make them use pencil\pen and paper? If their technology that they are pushing for other people's kids to adopt is so good and supposedly makes them smarter then why aren't they using it to benefit their own kids? Surely what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

From Kidlogger.net
"Employees of Silicon Valley giants send their children to school without computer technologies. This is the Waldorf School of the Peninsula. You couldn’t find here screens at all. But you can find pens and paper, knitting needles and, occasionally, mud.

While other schools in the region brag about their wired classrooms, the Waldorf School embraces a simple, retro look — blackboards with colorful chalk, bookshelves with encyclopedias, wooden desks filled with workbooks and pencils."
 
If it's not a problem then why do most of the children of the tech giants and CEOs send their kids to schools that still make them use pencil\pen and paper? If their technology that they are pushing for other people's kids to adopt is so good and supposedly makes them smarter then why aren't they using it to benefit their own kids? Surely that should say something.
Because nothing is stopping parents from buying books to read and writing materials for their kids to practice with, or giving their kids projects at home that involve writing.

Externalizing these problems away from the source is how you ignore a problem and only find solutions that don't work. Blaming the tech/schools/whatever for kids being retarded is no different than blaming the dog for shitting on the living room rug. Sure, perhaps having written assignments might do some good, but I doubt it as the problem is deeper than that.

A problem that's too complex and granular for a one-note solution that people can heap upon the government without having to think about it anymore. It took decades to get to this point, and it'd take decades of collaborative effort on a societal scale to fix. But that's difficult, unwieldy, and would take effort as well as wide-spread acceptance of responsibility.
 
Last edited:
ineligible handwriting
i should add some words to not get b&
fucking j*urnos

edit: here's a poast to reply to
Because nothing is stopping parents from buying books to read and writing materials for their kids to practice with, or giving their kids projects at home that involve writing.

Externalizing these problems away from the source is how you ignore a problem and only find solutions that don't work. Blaming the tech/schools/whatever for kids being retarded is no different than blaming the dog for shitting on the living room rug. Sure, perhaps having written assignments might do some good, but I doubt it as the problem is deeper than that.
YOU can raise your own kids well. You can't raise everyone else's kids well, and the society your kids end up living in depends on them, too. It's nice to think, "oh, if everyone else is a tard, my kids will be on top of the world", but it will be a shittier, faggier world.

(Also if the teacher can't read cursive, your kids won't be able to submit homework in cursive.)
 
Last edited:
YOU can raise your own kids well. You can't raise everyone else's kids well, and the society your kids end up living in depends on them, too. It's nice to think, "oh, if everyone else is a tard, my kids will be on top of the world", but it will be a shittier, faggier world.
I get that. I'm saying that if people collectively gave enough of a fuck to raise their kids well, this wouldn't be a problem.

I really don't want to have to dig through the bowels of a yandex search to find it, but I distinctly remember having my mind blown at the gov experiment where billions were poured into a school for inner-city kids complete with the best everything money could buy.

Shit was destroyed and the kids didn't do any better. Because they were still of the bix-nood mindset. It's no different with any kid as learning starts at home, and the culture around it.
(Also if the teacher can't read cursive, your kids won't be able to submit homework in cursive.)
Which gets into the other part of the problem, it's multi-generational at this point. We're circling the drain and everyone wants to point the finger at anything other than the parents and the culture we live in, because it's easier to accept and comes with convenient answers.

Not too different from someone as big as boogie claiming they have a thyroid problem rather than a "being a fat fuck" problem.

FWIW I'm not saying I have any solutions, but perhaps one could be found if the problem could be correctly identified en masse rather than brushed under the rug.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Claus and Coldgrip
Well surely its the writing and not cutting education spending for the last decade?

No goy its just one lottle cirriculum change thatll magically fix the issue instead of the nigger rigged education system falling to pieces
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Ibanez RG 350EX
Education spending and education outcomes are almost entirely uncorrelated. All the money in the world won't turn niggers into scholars.
Yea if the money isnt effectively spent and ends up in some schlomos pocket then no you wont see an improvement but the state of some public schoole are absolutely abysmal.

In conjunction with programs where they refuse to seperate classes by academic achievement (read people who try vs dont) to achieve everyone being equitably stupid is mystifying
 
I remember painstakingly learning cursive and, when I hit adulthood, proudly showing off my signature where every letter was written in beautiful, regal articulation... and then having to shittify it because every clerk, doctor, and secretary I met told me they couldn't read it. My current signature is just the first letter of my name and a random hand flourish. Not a single person has questioned it since.
I feel ya, I was taught cursive in the third grade but for some reason they stopped having us write like that. So I completely forgot about it until I had to make my first signature when I became an adult.

I realized that I should probably learn to actually write my name in cursive at least, just to figure out that nobody actually read it, so I just started scribbling it again.
 
Yea if the money isnt effectively spent and ends up in some schlomos pocket then no you wont see an improvement but the state of some public schoole are absolutely abysmal.
Yeah, all the Joos on the school boards in Detroit and Cleveland are the problem. Must be Black Hebrew Israelites.
 
What's wrong with handwriting in print? Other than for your signature (which, in most people's cases, is already a barely-legible scribble only faintly reminiscent of script), I see no point in cursive.

Should we go back to using f's for s's?

Fneed'f feed and feed
Formerly Chuck'f

I'm partial to the German ß myself
 
Genes are set in stone, but their expression is not. You can have the genes to be tall, but if you grow up malnourished, you won't be. It's more of a potential than a predestination.
Do you know what the word "mostly" means or are you another victim of "muh teknoologee"?
What you're describing as intelligence is fluid intelligence that can change dramatically in childhood/adolescence, you're right in that it's not something that can be taught or learned but it is like a muscle it needs to be used or it will atrophy.
Sorry, man, but I'm not buying it. Whatever the fuck "fluid intelligence" is supposed to be, that is.

IQ can accurately be determined pretty early in childhood and generally remains the same throughout life barring some extreme environmental factors.

People can't just cope themselves into being intelligent. Likewise, they can't make themselves less intelligent unless they suffer some sort of brain damage.

Sorry y'all had to find out like this.
 
Listen up NIGGERS and grab a pen.
Write any phrase that comes to mind, with pen on paper, right now, in print.
Notice how you have to pick up the pen off the paper for at least every letter, if not several times per letter. Notice how much of your time writing is actually wasted with the tip of the pen in the air instead of putting ink on paper. Seeing this in person is the analog version of seeing your parents search-and-peck their way on a keyboard.
Now try writing the same phrase, again, but keep the pen on the paper for the entirety of each word. After a few tries, you should be able to write the phrase again much faster than you could in print. When you're writing any significant amount of text by hand, this speed difference is absolutely massive.

Forget the "Cursive-by-the-book" method that's taught in gradeschools, it's trying to force something that would best be learned naturally by anyone who writes in pen for more than a few paragraphs, and it's useless if the students are using pencils anyways, which are inevitably slower than even a dollar store pen.
 
This reminds me of going to college, during my AS when you'd take the Gen Ed classes with lots of other students in different majors. Homegirl wrote a two page paper in text/Internet shorthand and got a passing grade. Standards have been dead for a long time, and those who've tried to maintain it have been slandered as holding up white supremacy.

Sure, I'll even say cursive was a lie back in my day; where we learned it in 3rd grade and up through 8th were told everyone uses it, blah blah blah. Only for 9th grade to hit and those teachers tell us our penmanship is so shitty they can barely read our regular print and to stick to that.

Either way, once cursive entirely falls, make no mistake that the rest of the writing system will as well.
 
Back