Disaster America's fight to save handwriting from extinction as IQs begin to fall for first time ever - and teachers warn some 20-year-olds can't sign checks anymore

  • Americans reported they hadn't written a note or personal letter in five years
  • People are having a hard time reading their own and others' handwriting
  • Studies show writing can increase the brain's cognitive abilities

Several US states are trying to prevent handwriting from going extinct as classrooms increasingly swap pen and paper for tablets and computers.

The US government removed the skill from the core curriculum in 2010 due to claims it was time consuming and would not be useful in the age of technology which meant schools could instead focus on typing classes.

Handwriting is considered a fine motor skill that stimulates and challenges the brain, but with schools turning to technology instead, some teachers are complaining students can barely hold a pencil but can swipe and double-click on their devices.

Students with learning disabilities like dysgraphia - when children can read but have trouble writing letters - can also be affected because methods of overcoming the disability requires them to practice writing by hand.

Previous studies have revealed that IQ scores have dropped for the first time in a century and indicated that technology could be to blame.

Teachers, parents and experts who DailyMail.com spoke to said they were seeing kids and young adults who don't know how to sign their name or read cursive.

Experts have urged schools to re-introduce cursive into the curriculum, citing the need to understand historical documents. Pictured: Cursive written before it was removed from the common core standard in 2010

New legislative bills have been passed in states like California and New York requiring students aged six to 12 years old to learn cursive writing, but others are still advancing in state legislature while some are still hesitant to revert back including Colorado, New Mexico and Nevada.

'I wish [students] would learn how to write in cursive,' Tracy Bendish, an ABA autism therapist for Jefferson Public Schools told DailyMail.com.

'But it is like the telephone on the wall,' she said. 'Less and less used and then not there anymore.'

There is a big educational disparity between schools that readily have access to gadgets versus those that don't, causing what's called the digital divide.

Students who have better access to technology will have better educational success than those who don't, which is particularly concerning as more teachers turn to technology in their courses.

'The digital divide has affected individual students in the same school as well as groups of students across districts, lowering the academic outcomes of low-income, underserved students and districts,' according to American University.

Last year, researchers at the University of Oregon and Northwestern reported that IQ scores had dropped because technology shortens attention spans and decreases the need to think deeply.

Experts have been urging governments and school administrators to bring handwriting back to schools, citing sixth graders who have trouble holding a pencil but can use digital devices with ease.

Dr. Lori Koerner, the assistant superintendent for the Riverhead Central School District in New York, told DailyMail.com that it is essential for elementary and middle schoolers to be taught cursive.

'Though technology has its benefits, children need to be able to read cursive in the event a document is presented to them along their journey.

'They most certainly, at the very least, need to know how to sign their name,' Koerner said.

'I have encountered too many secondary students and employment candidates who cannot sign documents relative to their onboarding process.'

Teachers and coworkers continue to struggle with ineligible handwriting, and a 2021 survey conducted by OnePoll on behalf of Bic USA Inc. found that 45 percent of Americans struggle to read their own handwriting while a shocking 70 percent reported that they have trouble reading notes or reports from their coworkers.

Some people have expressed similar views, saying that signing important documents will become a stressful practice without the ability to write cursive.

'My 20 year-old-granddaughter struggles to sign a check,' said Kimberly Jacovino of Monroe, Connecticut.

'It is very important and should be brought back to all schools,' she added.

In the wake of turning to keyboarding instead of writing by hand, educators found students' IQ levels are shrinking and placed the blame on technology in the classroom, Psychology Today reported.

Hetty Roessingh, a professor emerita of education at the University of Calgary echoed this sentiment, saying that five-year-olds are not meeting academic benchmarks because of the accessibility of digital devices.

Roessingh has long advocated for schools to push handwriting and cursive on children because it is an important tool to engage the hand-brain complex and circuitry that induces memory and retrieving information that typing simply doesn't do.

A new study published in February by researchers at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) found that handwriting is linked to increased cognitive brain function, motor skills and memory.

'It is important to realize that the brain follows the principle of 'use it or lose it,' said Audrey van der Meer, the study's lead author and neuropsychology professor at the NTNU.

'When writing by hand, most of the brain is active,' she continued.

'This requires the brain to communicate between its active parts which, in turn, puts the brain in a state that helps both children and adults learn more and remember better,' van der Meer said.

Schools stopped teaching cursive in 2010 when most US states adopted what's called Common Core State Standards, which set benchmarks for reading and math but didn't include cursive as part of the recommended curriculum.

At the time, critics said teaching efforts would be better spent on developing new skills like coding and keyboarding while others called the writing style 'old fashioned.'

When dropping cursive from common core, lawmakers argued that cursive was time-consuming and wouldn't be as useful as other skills like typing, that students would need at they moved on to junior and high school,' a then-spokesperson for Georgia Department of Education told ABC News at the time.

Cursive also wasn't on the tests that ranked schools under the No Child Left Behind Law which was put in place by the Bush Administration in 2002 and ended in 2015.

Schools would typically gear their learning curriculum around what was required under the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) which set benchmarks for academic performance that all schools had to meet.

If they continuously failed to meet the NCLB standards, the state had the right to change the school's leadership team or even close the school.

Forty-one states adopted the common core curriculum and while individually they were able to choose to teach cursive, California and Massachusetts were among the few states to opt in.

Roughly six years later, 14 states reintroduced the writing style into all classes, and by 2019, that number grew to 20 states.

Democratic assemblywoman Sharon Quirk-Silva introduced a bill in California last year, citing the need for students to not only be able to write in cursive but to read it as well.

The California bill will go into effect for the upcoming 2024-2025 school year but similar bills are still pending in states like Kentucky where, if it's passed, would be implemented in the 2025-2026 academic year.

The push is also in response to the ever-increasing artificial intelligence technology, which Quirk-Silva believed will cause teachers to return to handwritten essay exams necessitating students' ability to write in cursive because it is faster than print.

If handwriting becomes extinct, it would be a major loss to understanding history or connecting with our past, Roessingh said.

'It is about the embodied cognition and the circuitry behind personal messages that are beneficial both for the person who wrote it and the person who read it,' she said.

Handwriting, particularly cursive, presents the idea of what's called embodied cognition, meaning it acts as a switch to lock in your memory.

This makes it increasingly important for kids to write by hand and learn cursive because they are 'essentially tactile and sensory beings who take in the world through engagement,' Roessingh explained.

More than that, a piece of history could be lost to younger generations who aren't taught to read and write cursive, leaving them unable to read major historical documents like the diary of Anne Franke, the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Chelsea Hayes, a Maryland mom, said regardless of what schools decide, she plans on making sure her three-year-old daughter knows how to write in cursive when she gets older.

'I do think it's important. Not just for historical purposes, but also just as a skill. I think it's almost like learning another language,' Hayes said.

'You don't teach kids art or music because of history, though I guess there's a historical component you can put in there.

'It's just another skill I think she should have. If she never uses it, oh well. If she does, great.'

Read more:
 
We literally learned it for a year in elementary school, learned to sign our names, then never used it for anything again. I really don't see a ton of value in cursive beyond that; it's like learning Latin.
Man I wish, 3rd grade was multiplication, cursive, state history, and probably other basic things I can't remember. Got really good at my timestables and absolutely hated cursive, and was forced on us for five long years; until jaded high-school teachers told us to knock that shit off.
 
On one hand, standardised cursive is fine. My teacher told me I write like an SS officer... prophetic!

But fuck people's personal flowery lettering snobbery, yeah that's only useful for your secret fedposting notebook. Not for talking to other people at time in distamce, which writing was made for. May as well invent your own letters.

And who uses checks these days? No one who isn't a boomer. And even then you can write in it in capital printed letters.
03b3cd0408708790ba67b7eccf3e7ad3.jpg
This isn't rocket science, but it only works for its intended purpose if you can make them look like this. I just use it to sign stuff or write down recipes. Even this could be optimised for modern pens, like D doesn't need the hook and none of the capitals need it on the front unless you write in german and its FührerKampfenWagon. I also found that V and W are better with sharp angles, easier to differentiate from U.


Why americans get dumber? More niggers, more darkies more pajeets more pakis. Niggers can't spell, much less write, U wot bix nood fr fr lit gyatt muh dik.
 
Last edited:
I may be going against the mold here but personally, I'd rather take pretty, readable print handwriting over cursive any day. Like, yeah, cursive can look nice and can make your signatures pretty, but print is just so much better and even if you're sloppy with it you can still read whatever you wrote even if it looks like ass.
 
Imagine giving a fuck about writing in fancy obsolete squiggles. Do you also write numbers in roman numerals?
The only time people really encounter Roman numerals is on clock dials. Unfortunately an increasing number of people can't read analogue clocks (even with Arabic numerals) because nobody's sat them down with one of these to explain
1000028309.jpg
Sorry, man, but I'm not buying it. Whatever the fuck "fluid intelligence" is supposed to be, that is.

IQ can accurately be determined pretty early in childhood and generally remains the same throughout life barring some extreme environmental factors.

People can't just cope themselves into being intelligent. Likewise, they can't make themselves less intelligent unless they suffer some sort of brain damage.
Developing minds need specific interventions at critical periods to reach their full potential. Feral children who've been neglected will never properly undergo language acquisition - starting them late can teach them a limited vocabulary, but they'll not speak like adults do. So likewise if a child with genes for intelligence grows up in a home where they are never encouraged to read, their parents don't read to them and they spend all their time swiping through a tablet getting sensory overload from Elsa vs Spiderman videos on YouTube Kids and playing Roblox? Odds are that child's intelligence won't develop to its full potential.
There'll still be kids in that scenario who manage to thrive; their natural curiosity may drive them to develop themselves. A friend of a friend's little girl is the only person in that house who reads, and she's reading very advanced novels for a kid still in primary school (she's actually having a crack at Dickens).
It's like throwing seeds upon stony ground. Some of them will still thrive, but a lot of them won't, even if they've got all that potential there. Once you miss a developmental window, that potential has often dried up.
Watching people navigate cities they've lived in for decades using GPS really drives that home. These people know should every street and shortcut, optimal routing, to everything within months/years of living somewhere. Instead, they stare at GPS, waiting for it to tell them what to do. It leaves me aghast witnessing that.
We have these little map "miniliths" everywhere in London. They're quite handy if you're in a bit you're not as familiar with.
minilith-richmond.jpg1_123125_2245632_2246167_2246661_100303_signs_distancesex.jpg.CROP.original-original.jpg
A lot of people in London are not from London and have moved here as adults, and therefore are less familiar with how parts of the city "join up" (it's not uncommon for people to know a certain area around a tube station but not that if they walk 10 minutes in that direction, they'll have arrived in another "island" they know around a tube station). But I realised with horror, like Invasion of the Body Snatchers, that not only do people seem weirdly oblivious to these miniliths (people I've gone for lunch with complaining they don't know how to get to their station while stood next to one) but a surprising number of people can't read maps. They can follow GPS instructions ("turn left here, proceed straight on for 50 yards, turn right") but actually looking at a map and working out a route? Can't do it.

I've shown a 34 year old man how to get from Tottenham Court Road to Covent Garden. He'd been planning to get the tube for one stop, and then change onto another line to travel one stop, but I told him it was a pretty straightforward 10 minute walk and it'd be quicker than doing the Tube. However once I showed him the map I may as well been showing him hieroglyphics. Even after tracing the route out with a finger and reassuring him that these map miniliths are everywhere, he still couldn't follow along and got his phone to read him directions.

People who can't read tube maps are even more challenging. I've been on a platform with a sign like this:
maxresdefault (6).jpg
which only shows you the stations the train will go to and been asked "does this train go to Stratford". I make some allowances for tourists who maybe are not used to reading metro signs, but I'm pretty sure a lot of these people aren't tourists, they just can't work out how to follow a very simple schematic. The feeling I get from this is a bit like when I found out some people "don't have an inner monologue" or "can't picture images in their heads".
 
I don't really see much use in analogue clocks and AM/PM.

Even if there is a niche use for them, you could easily improve on it.

I could maybe see it as something that could be useful if you need to tell the time quickly and only need it for the first or second half of the day.

You could just make the arm glow with a LED. Yellow for am, blue for pm, minutes can be green arn, seconds if you need them red arm, etc.

Maybe than its useful in a factory or car where you can have trouble determining the numbers if you can't look at it leisurely.

This is just cope. Your students aren't dumb because they can't read cursive. They are dumb because they are brown.
 
That's worse than United Cuckdom.

That's Londonistan, Londonabad, or Poo Mecca.
 
Late to the thread, but one of the most horrifying articles I've ever read was about history students at a Big Deal university not being able to read source documents whatsoever.

Like for me looking at Henry VIII's handwriting takes some scowling, but I'm sure that if I looked at it every day, it would click.

We're talking little fuckers where the Declaration of Independence, which was written by someone with beautiful penmanship, is not accessible to them.

Grandpa's letters home from WWII may as well be in fucking Kraut for all they can read them.

"The girls here are really pretty, but it's $50 if you're caught with one. Then again, what's money to a soldier?"
 
Everytime a thread on kiwifarms is made about cursive, 2 types of posters show up:

1.) People who wasted time and effort learning a completely worthless skill and are now desperately trying to cope by attempting to rationalize it not being less useful than underwater basket weaving.

2.) Everyone else.
 
I was taught cursive and printing but I hated cursive because it felt like I was making extra movements that complicated writing letters. Eventually I naturally learned to combine printing and cursive until I developed my own style of handwriting that I later learned was called italicized handwriting. Far superior and people can actually read what I write.

But lol @ anyone who thinks its ok for kids not to learn how to handwrite(not necessarily cursive). If our children don't know how to use a pen and paper we are failing as a society.
 
D'Neilian fucked up like half a generation's handwriting because they swapped the style halfway through a semester and thought it wouldn't be a problem.
Trying to figure out whether I learned D'Neilian or Zaner-Bloser in school...seems like maybe a mix.

cursive is annoying and obsolete tbh

but don't you fucking lie to me and say that writing a cursive capital 'D' is not the most cathartic thing. idk maybe i'm just a little autistic
About a decade ago I bought a copy of the Spencerian penmanship book and re-learned cursive. All of the cursive capital letters are enjoyable to write. They were designed to swoop around at angles natural to the hand, while keeping their aesthetic appeal.

1713965968943.png


Everytime a thread on kiwifarms is made about cursive, 2 types of posters show up:

1.) People who wasted time and effort learning a completely worthless skill and are now desperately trying to cope by attempting to rationalize it not being less useful than underwater basket weaving.

2.) Everyone else.
Cursive penmanship seems like one of those things that has untold correlations with other positive traits, like returning a shopping cart or flossing. I bet putting a thousand randomly drawn names of people with good cursive handwriting in charge of a city or state, and another thousand who couldn't write in cursive at all in charge of another, would be very illuminating.
 
Cursive penmanship seems like one of those things that has untold correlations with other positive traits, like returning a shopping cart or flossing. I bet putting a thousand randomly drawn names of people with good cursive handwriting in charge of a city or state, and another thousand who couldn't write in cursive at all in charge of another, would be very illuminating.
If you take a thousand randomly drawn names of people in posession of any skill that requires a lot of time, effort, and dedication to master you would notice various correlations with positive traits and behaviour.

The argument here is whether or not said skill should be completely worthless.

You could accomplish the same test with 1000 people who are really into woodworking, or playing an instrument or something.
 
No, Oilspill is correct about this. I haven't had to use Cursive at all except for signing my name since middle school. Everywhere else has encouraged print overwhelmingly, if they didn't outright mandate its use like several previous places I had worked at. It's not that I haven't been able to, it's that the ability to be clearly understood is way more important than elegance most of the time, which is good because my ability to write cursive is shit.

Thankfully, I can understand cursive just fine, which if you ask me is the far bigger issue. Most adults don't write in cursive if they can help it.
But a shockingly high number need to be able to read that shit.
 
I take a lot of handwritten notes so I use cursive constantly. My cursive is neater than my printing, and in all honestly, I like writing in cursive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Claus
Back