Manosphere Amud - The Balloon Loon, Loveshy Extraordinaire

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Amud said:
All I said was that I would prefer for the races to remain genetically separate and distinct, rather then blending together to form a homogeneous mono-racial unit.
Click to expand...

You do realize this kind of genetic bottlenecking is actually closer to the "genetic denigration" which you rail against, and genetic diversity is created within multiethnic families? @Satan 's personal anecdote is representative of this.

Either you're stupid or you're racist. I'm betting you're both.

EDITED for clarity
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: cromit, CisCat, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and 19 others
Amud said:
Can someone explain how disagreeing with interracial marriage makes someone a racist?

Racism is the belief that some races are inherently superior to others or that some races should rule over or exterminate others. I never once posted anything which implies that I hold these beliefs. All I said was that I would prefer for the races to remain genetically separate and distinct, rather then blending together to form a homogeneous mono-racial unit. You are the one who took this and made the leap to assuming that I think some races are better than others. You are projecting.
Click to expand...
Can you explain why you want people to be racially segregated?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Awesome Man, CisCat, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and 14 others
Amud said:
Again, can you explain how wanting the races to not blend together into a homogenous mono-racial unit equated to thinking that some races are innately superior to others? You have failed to provide any support for your allegations.
Click to expand...
Why are inter-ethnic relationships bad again? Explain in detail for everyone.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mr. Awesome Man, CisCat, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and 14 others
Amud said:
1. I mentioned the female sluts first because that's the first thing I was asked when I signed up for this forum. I did not intend to create any sort of gender war. I have equal disdain for chads as I do for sluts.

2. Premarital sex is okay if it's in a monogamous, devoted relationship. Casual sex means promiscuous sex.

3. What I'm doing is a modified form of NCR (Neurocranial Restructuring). It involves inflating finger cots (not condoms) in the nasal passages using a blood pressure vale. The inflation puts pressure on the sphenoid bone, which is supposed to improve the skull's alignment.

4. I'm not talking about races like white, black, Asian, Hispanic, etc. I'm talking about distinct phenotypes within the European / white race. I'm not even considering other races in this analysis. If you read my topics, you will see that genius scientists have a distinct phenotype that is clearly different in appearance from normal people. This is not up for debate. The pictures I posted in that thread clearly show it.
Click to expand...
Hey guys, I'm not a slut in Amud's eyes!!! @Holden you hear that you sick pedo-fork???
So... please stop doing that NCR thing.... it sounds painful and not at all productive to whatever it is you want to do. It's also disgusting and the moment a girl sees you doing that or hears you do it.... she'll run for the hills (unless she's crazy... don't stick yo dick in crazy please).

I read your topics, and you only name "genius" scientists that fit your distinct phenotypes; that doesn't prove anything. You completely disregard or even fail to try and find anyone "genius" that fits a different phenotype. It'd be like me saying "retrievers are most famous dogs! look at all of the retrievers used in these movies" and then completely fail to name movies with other dogs in them.

Not to mention all the scientists you mention are males.. like females can't even be "genius" levels.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: CisCat, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, José Mourinho and 12 others
Amud said:
Can someone explain how disagreeing with interracial marriage makes someone a racist?

Racism is the belief that some races are inherently superior to others or that some races should rule over or exterminate others. I never once posted anything which implies that I hold these beliefs. All I said was that I would prefer for the races to remain genetically separate and distinct, rather then blending together to form a homogeneous mono-racial unit. You are the one who took this and made the leap to assuming that I think some races are better than others. You are projecting.
Click to expand...
because wanting people to breed in their own race implies that other races arent worth breeding in

but why i am i explaining this to you? you arent going to listen to me, and you'll just blow me off or call me an idiot for not having your exact views. you need to educate yourself or actually listen to the people in this thread and stop being a 12 year old edgelord
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: CisCat, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, José Mourinho and 8 others
Amud said:
Can someone explain how disagreeing with interracial marriage makes someone a racist?

Racism is the belief that some races are inherently superior to others or that some races should rule over or exterminate others. I never once posted anything which implies that I hold these beliefs. All I said was that I would prefer for the races to remain genetically separate and distinct, rather then blending together to form a homogeneous mono-racial unit. You are the one who took this and made the leap to assuming that I think some races are better than others. You are projecting.
Click to expand...
Because if it's not a racist thought, it's stupid as fuck thought. So because you claim you aren't stupid as fuck, it has to be a racist one.
You don't want "breeds of people" to mix. You don't want racial mixing. You claim it keeps things better (somehow magically)
You'd rather greeks reproduce with other greeks, japanese people with other japanese, africans with other africans, etc with other etc... that's stupid and in fact promotes incest-like degeneration. Look at purebred dogs and cats for example, they have a plethora of bad genes and poor health because they've only bred within their breed... mutts on the other hand are a shit-ton healthier.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cromit, CisCat, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and 17 others
Amud said:
Again, can you explain how wanting the races to not blend together into a homogenous mono-racial unit equated to thinking that some races are innately superior to others? You have failed to provide any support for your allegations.
Click to expand...
You can't just invent your own special definition of the word racist and then say it doesn't apply to you. "Race-mixing" and "miscegenation" are terms that are generally only used approvingly by racists.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mr. Awesome Man, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, José Mourinho and 9 others
4Macie said:
Hey guys, I'm not a slut in Amud's eyes!!! @Holden you hear that you sick pedo-fork???
So... please stop doing that NCR thing.... it sounds painful and not at all productive to whatever it is you want to do. It's also disgusting and the moment a girl sees you doing that or hears you do it.... she'll run for the hills (unless she's crazy... don't stick yo dick in crazy please).

I read your topics, and you only name "genius" scientists that fit your distinct phenotypes; that doesn't prove anything. You completely disregard or even fail to try and find anyone "genius" that fits a different phenotype. It'd be like me saying "retrievers are most famous dogs! look at all of the retrievers used in these movies" and then completely fail to name movies with other dogs in them.

Not to mention all the scientists you mention are males.. like females can't even be "genius" levels.
Click to expand...

These are well thought out arguments. I will make a good effort to address them.

  1. In my thread, I admitted that there are some scientists who do not fit that phenotype. However, it is clear that they are very much in the minority.
  2. My thread is still in progress. More examples and information to come.
  3. I mentioned Marie Curie in the thread. It's obvious that you did not read it, or only skimmed it very briefly.

A Hotdog said:
Hey Amud, What is your opinion to casual homosexual relationships, And homosexuality in general.

Since that doesn't directly cause babies to happen it must be alright in your book, right?
Click to expand...

If that's what they want to do, they can go ahead and do it. I don't appreciate things like bug catching and wearing colorful dildo suits in the streets.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Informative
Reactions: Mr. Awesome Man, KimCoppolaAficionado, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and 5 others
Amud said:
A good example of genetic degradation was the transition from Homo neanderthalensis to Homo sapiens.
Click to expand...

Please tell me someone has brought up the fact that homo sapiens are not directly descended from neanderthals, already. We shared a common ancestor, just as we share a common ancestor with modern apes. Some human populations have a small amount of neanderthal DNA, but that is because we interbred with them back before neanderthals went extinct (most probably because they were either out-competed or absorbed into homo sapiens population). Not because we directly descended from them. (source) (and another) (interesting shit but I thought it was common knowledge by now)

Positron said:
https://kiwifarms.net/attachments/1-png.20210/
Click to expand...
w1s3PQm.gif
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: cromit, CisCat, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and 17 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back