Manosphere Amud - The Balloon Loon, Loveshy Extraordinaire

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Don't tell me that guy can do "3D facial analysis" just by a frontal photograph.

And why the obsession with faces? Do they think having a perfect "slayerid" face will cause people to ignore your potbelly?

1. Because you can't work your face out. They hate effort.

2. Yes, 3D thinks you can analyze facial bones from a picture. You should see his Slut Theory. Oh my god this guy is such a mess.
 
Not a biologist, just interested in science, but while I'm pretty sure that most of the hybrids that can be produced are usually infertile (mules, ligers, etc.) more closely related species can produce viable and even fertile offspring. Viable just means it can survive, fertility is more important, since that would allow it to pass on its genes from both parent species and would explain the small amount of neanderthal DNA existing in modern humans.
This goes into reproductive isolation as the determining factor of species.
 
This goes into reproductive isolation as the determining factor of species.
True - although I don't think reproductive isolation is only considering the genetic component. Asian leopard cats and servals are wild animals, not generally living in the same environment as humans with pet cats, and if they did happen to run across a domestic cat in the wild they might be more likely to kill or eat it rather than have sex with it. Hell, apparently both servals and Asian leopard cats are considered both to be a different genus than domestic cats, not just different species - but when they're intentionally combined by human actions they can still produce viable and fertile offspring. They just likely never would in the wild.
 
Hello, I've been reading this thread for a while and I got to say @Amud, why do you care so much about the physical features of one's own head or other people's? So if a person's head is shape in an odd way than they are "supposedly" related to Neanderthals? And the evidences that you are brining to suggest this are papers or notes written by people without credentials? There is a reason why many people go into Phd or research, as they can develop and publish information that can help answer some of mankind's questions about the world. Telling those people who have spent years, for some - decades, that their papers/ research has no meaning simply because they "paid" to get a fancy paper, is a HUGE slap to the face to those who have dedicated their whole life to figuring out a solution to a problem.

So I should believe you and your evidence then, because you are a TRUE AND HONEST person who wouldn't lie? Nah, I rather stick with the people who have overcome Graduate school and earned a Phd in their chosen field.

By the way, weren't you taught at a young age not to stick things up your nose? You don't want to lessen you chances even more to find a "non slut" woman who would pass your "wonderfully" genes to your offsprings.
 
True - although I don't think reproductive isolation is only considering the genetic component.
I actually wrote this in my really long post explaining this. Reproductive isolation includes behavior, mechanical differences (such as with snails and their left or right reproductive organs), gametic differences and location differences.

while many take this to mean producing viable offspring reproductive isolation can be temporal, mechanical, behavioral or based on gametes.
 
I actually wrote this in my really long post explaining this. Reproductive isolation includes behavior, mechanical differences (such as with snails and their left or right reproductive organs), gametic differences and location differences.
Ahh cool, did not see that one, my mistake.
 
Seriously why did you mention Pete Postlethwaite, do you honestly think that he's not human cause you don't like how his face looked like in a couple of pictures?
A point I think has been somewhat elided: @Amud legit seems to believe in Neandertal superiority over anatomically modern humans. Like, within his own wacky belief system, he was probably giving Mr. Postlethwaite a compliment.

So, @Amud, I'm curious: how far does your Neandertal loremastery extend? Do you knap flint? Can you live off the land? Construct dugout canoes? Engage in shamanistic practices? Do you do anything cool?

Inquiring minds want to know.
 
If an Ignoblid gets ambitious and, like yourself, decides to reshape his cranium via invasive nasal inflation, would you consider not exterminating him?

No

Wait, wasn't Benjamin Franklin a total "Chad" as well?

Absolutely not. I believe I discussed Franklin inmy Noble Phenotypes thread on The Apricity. If not, I will soon.

You have any idea how Chaddish Listz, Wagner and Debussy were?

Then cite an identical-twin study that shows how "genetic intelligence" has been decreasing while "environmental intelligence" goes the other way.

1. No, they have phenotypes on the Nobilid spectrum. I've devoted extensive time to analyzing the appearance of classical composers.
2. Can you even make inferences or do you need scienmagistic papers to spoon-feed everything to you?


By what standards are you judging someone as being nobilid/ignobilid? Gina Rinehart is pretty much one of the most highest ranking people in the world due to her net worth. Nobility has always been tied to high wealth and "good breeding", although I scoff at that concept because many people of nobility and especially royal heritage have significant traces of incest in their bloodlines resulting in "ignobilid" looking birth defects.

I only push you to elaborate because I actually have trouble finding any research into this as a legitimate term (excepting some rogue posts on Stormfront, but I don't know you and I don't know what you're supposed to be representing so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and not draw any assumptions that you would be connected to a white supremacist website).

Also editing because you didn't address my original question either. Define to me what is an "actively destructive" person.

1. It's based on skull and facial structure. Those inbred "nobility" are actually Melonheads, which is a different race that is not related to the Nobilid phenotype.
2. You're lying. I just did a google search for "ignobilid" and nothing came up from Stormfront. I created the term myself.
3. An actively destructive person is one who impedes the progress of society.

Beethoven too. That guy was a "known associate" of prostitutes.

So? I would be an associate of prostitutes if I had more money.

Sadly, I must agree with Amud on one thing. Tinder definitely is a degenerate dating app in that in between all the "Country Girls" that abound in my area looking for their own Toby Keith and all the camwhore bots, I now have to pay just to match with more bots!

Also, since @Amud is a self proclaimed expert in the science of facial attractiveness, I must ask what he thinks of this guy. From what I hear, there may be some girls (and guys for some weird reason) who would bang him, Kiwis included. He's Love-Shy's Public Enemy #1 from what I heard. Must be the Alpha Bad Boy swag.

That guy is unattractive. He has Potatid and Ethnikid influence. He is probably incel.

Nikola Tesla was a virgin his entire life, didn't stop him from changing the world. Also, pretty much every classical composer was a complete chad.

Tesla was the most extreme Nobilid the world has ever seen (I explain this in my Apricity thread0, and many composers were also Nobilid.
 
No



Absolutely not. I believe I discussed Franklin inmy Noble Phenotypes thread on The Apricity. If not, I will soon.



1. No, they have phenotypes on the Nobilid spectrum. I've devoted extensive time to analyzing the appearance of classical composers.
2. Can you even make inferences or do you need scienmagistic papers to spoon-feed everything to you?




1. It's based on skull and facial structure. Those inbred "nobility" are actually Melonheads, which is a different race that is not related to the Nobilid phenotype.
2. You're lying. I just did a google search for "ignobilid" and nothing came up from Stormfront. I created the term myself.
3. An actively destructive person is one who impedes the progress of society.



So? I would be an associate of prostitutes if I had more money.



That guy is unattractive. He has Potatid and Ethnikid influence. He is probably incel.



Tesla was the most extreme Nobilid the world has ever seen (I explain this in my Apricity thread0, and many composers were also Nobilid.
C'mon, buddy - stop answering the same questions over and over and let's get down to brass tacks. Wouldn't you look so much cooler in, like, cavebear regalia than you do with a condom - oh, excuse me, FINGER COT - up your nose? Like it would seriously be hard to seem less cool or credible than you do right now.

Your schtick is stale, and it's been stale for a while. Stop holding out on us with the good stuff.

Loremastery or gtfo.
 
Last edited:
For those of you who insist on telling me that my theories have no "backing" no "evidence" or whatever other bullshit you keep trying to spew, I will explain why you are wrong for once and for all.

All of your criticisms of me are based on the assumption that whatever is found in "official" sources is good, and whatever is found in "unofficial" sources is bad. You seem to have an especially great fetish for "peer-reviewed journals". All of this is nonsensical. Academia is simply a qualification circle-jerk over who can be the most QUALIFIED and who can have the most SCIENMAGISTICAL PAPERZ. You have to remember that academic institutions are first and foremost MONEY-MAKING ORGANIZATIONS and POLITICAL organizations. Academia is governed not by science, but by money and politics.

This is why they charge innocent students 50000 dollars per year for a piece of scienmajistikal paper. Does having this paper make them any smarter than the person who can not afford to pay 50,000 dollars per year to learn about feminism, diversity studies and queer studies? These are REQUIRED CLASSES now. And politics has infected the education of our young children as well, so they are well-prepared to learn about the mode "advanced" queer studies in college. No longer are they learning to multiply and divide. Instead, they are learning to ponder the philosophical implications of the strawberry-picking escapades and school play ticket sales of Tyrone, Chung-Lei, Kumardeep, Eagle Talon, Shlomo, Ahmed, Rosita, and M'banwenge'. Meanwhile, these institutions are siphoning millions of dollars off of the school to get these required books, just as psychopathic inbred bankers siphon millions and billions of dollars off of us to get required bank loans so we can go to colleges and learn about strawberry picking and intersectionality.

And yet, even knowing all of this, you STILL insist that I am somehow "less qualified" than these strawberry-pickers, and that my opinions are somehow less valid. You'd have to be far more insane than I am if you think what they say even merits consideration. I don't know how you can assume they are any less biased than I am.
 
Last edited:
And yet, even after knowing all of this, you STILL insist that I am somehow "less qualified" than these strawberry-pickers, and that my opinions are somehow less valid. You'd have to be far more insane than I am if you think what they say even merits consideration.
Your opinions are less valid not because you are white, but because you are an idiot who snorts condoms.
 
Back