Berrakh
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2018
I wanted to say something on Tate’s cynical adoption of Islam. The reasons are pretty clear— his fans are brown and Islam is the brownoid religion, its views of women can be used to implicitly justify his abuse because “they’re whores anyway”, and there’s an aesthetic of conequest. Redpillers (used to) love the Bin Laden quote about the strong horse.
That last one has a funny paradox and confluence with his tough guy persona. If Gaza’s demolition has taught us anything, and this has been studied outside of Gaza, it’s that Arabic people suck at war. They put all their points into Ambushes, Terrorism, Intimidation, and Showmanship but none into anything fundamental to sustained conflict against a resilient enemy. So they fold. They show up, kidnap women, murder children, etc but they lose the actual fight. They talk about taking over the West and claiming (raping) our women (girls) but display no martial virtues at all and women find them repulsive if they have the slightest option to. And this obviously dovetails with Tate’s version of masculinity. He’s not a tough guy who seduces women he’s a criminal who beats and extorts them. And criminals, like Muslims, have no scaling menace. You’re either caught unawares by them or you’re safe. They attack vulnerabilities but can never overcome fortifications. Any time when the police are allowed to go mask off the criminals wilt under the pressure (Mussolini destroying the Mafia for example). And that’s really the only critique Tate can make. The fact he is allowed to be a parasite at all is the criticism.
And it’s obvious when you think about it. If crude brute strength were potent someone smarter would have amassed it before now.
That last one has a funny paradox and confluence with his tough guy persona. If Gaza’s demolition has taught us anything, and this has been studied outside of Gaza, it’s that Arabic people suck at war. They put all their points into Ambushes, Terrorism, Intimidation, and Showmanship but none into anything fundamental to sustained conflict against a resilient enemy. So they fold. They show up, kidnap women, murder children, etc but they lose the actual fight. They talk about taking over the West and claiming (raping) our women (girls) but display no martial virtues at all and women find them repulsive if they have the slightest option to. And this obviously dovetails with Tate’s version of masculinity. He’s not a tough guy who seduces women he’s a criminal who beats and extorts them. And criminals, like Muslims, have no scaling menace. You’re either caught unawares by them or you’re safe. They attack vulnerabilities but can never overcome fortifications. Any time when the police are allowed to go mask off the criminals wilt under the pressure (Mussolini destroying the Mafia for example). And that’s really the only critique Tate can make. The fact he is allowed to be a parasite at all is the criticism.
And it’s obvious when you think about it. If crude brute strength were potent someone smarter would have amassed it before now.