🐱 Andy Ngo slammed for doxing a minor

CatParty


Self-proclaimed journalist Andy Ngo doxed a minor after they threatened to milkshake him.

Ngo posted a photo of the 17-year-old to his Instagram. He included the minor’s name and their location in the caption.

The teen, along with friends, found Ngo’s phone number and texted Ngo a photo of him getting “milkshaked,” a form of antifascist activism where protesters will either hurl a milkshake at or pour one on right-wing figureheads.

In screenshotted messages posted to Twitter by a user who knows the teen, the teen claimed Ngo “reverse number searched us.”

The 17-year-old further claimed they were the only one with a Twitter account, which is why Ngo specifically targeted them.

“Did investigating & found out the harassing text I received is connected to phone # linked to [redacted] aka [redacted]. I recognize name because he produced a list of @ICEgov employees for comrades to stalk—the same list shared by Dayton antifa mass killer,” Ngo wrote, tagging Twitter Support.

Ngo included the handles to both the teen’s main Twitter account, which uses their real name, and a secondary account of theirs.


On Instagram, Ngo similarily boasted about finding the teen’s identity and posted more of the teen’s personal information.

“I found the identity of the person who sent me a harassing phone text. [redacted] is a [redacted] in the [redacted] area and antifa ideologue linked to a mass killer,” Ngo wrote.


The user who posted the screenshots also tweeted that the teen “had to deactivate for his own safety because Andy Ngo has doxxed him on his Instagram. And yes [redacted] is a minor.”

The teen’s secondary Twitter account appears to have been suspended.

Ngo might be in violation of Instagram’s terms of use regarding exposing private information. Posting private and confidential information, like “location information” is in violation of its terms, according to Instagram.

The Daily Dot has reached out to Andy Ngo and Instagram
 
I am glad he did it.
Its okay when they do it, but when its their turn all of a sudden its all serious and concerning.
"He doxxed a child!" wonder if that would put him at the exact same risk the ICE agents children are in because of him.

Good question, it could be interesting to hear what the ICE agents children said about this or going a step further having the ICE agents children meeting that "kid".
 
I'll care when they bother to report on all the minors Antifa doxes like that one Antifa teacher in Canada who's doxed people as young as 14.
Unlike the thot author who writes about Drumpf and Disney movies.
>All journalists are good people
>Andy Ngo is not a good person
>Therefore Andy Ngo is not a journalist
 
>17 year old gets doxed
>OMG he's just a child!

Aren't these the same people that sent bomb threats to a 16 year old Nicholas Sandmann's high school because he smirked at some Indian banging a drum in his face?

Unlike the thot author who writes about Drumpf and Disney movies.
They view journalists as a protected class, much in the same way minorities and the alphabet people are. They're just mad they can't figure out how to take all three of those things from him.
 
Hmm I think articles like these could be compiled to prove right-wing teenagers are more intelligent than their lefty counterparts. I mean, when 15-17 year old righties do things in public, they're noted as being mindful and fully aware of what they chose to do and the consequences that should befall them (enacted by people twice their age of course). While when left wing teenagers do things publicly, they're poor, misinformed and listless child victims and its WRONG to think such individuals should ever be punished for any reason you nazi bigot.

What is it exactly that makes right wing youngsters so much more aware (and therefore punishable) than their opposite number? Clearly our wonderful unbiased media is reporting these cases with 100% factuality. Thats a given.
 
Unlike the thot author who writes about Drumpf and Disney movies.
The more articles like this created, the more I think journalists are absolute psychopaths that deserve nothing but a painful death through demonic diseases. There was once a time where I too believed that "journalism is vital to a free society". Now I laugh when they get assaulted and bashed.

Of course, people like Andy Ngo and Tim Pool aren't journalists, I'm just taking the standards of these journos and applying them appropriately. Listen and believe right, so if this thot thinks Andy Ngo isn't a journalist, I agree with her. So no, I don't wish anything bad happen to them by their standards.

Journalists lie, people die.
Won't feel bad if a plane carrying 200 journalists gets shot down by Iran, and then every single one of them survives but become Eternally bound to liquid food praying for their death, with arms severed that disables them from pulling the plug themselves. I'll laugh. Don't call me a monster, the MSM embedded this hatred. I like being honest, something journos hate.

Of course not all journalists are bad, just most. Similar to how 13% doesn't commit 43% of violent crimes.
 
From a technical standpoint, doxing kids is usually harder than adults since they have less of a social media/digital footprint to start from, or it's better hidden on apps like Snapchat. I will say reverse-number searching whomever texted you getting milkshaked is an easy dox and nothing to brag about, but it was a kid who was doing the same shit so they should have known better & got what they deserved. It's more Andy Ngo & antifa drama, so everybody wins as the story continues.
 
The more articles like this created, the more I think journalists are absolute psychopaths that deserve nothing but a painful death through demonic diseases. There was once a time where I too believed that "journalism is vital to a free society". Now I laugh when they get assaulted and bashed.

Of course, people like Andy Ngo and Tim Pool aren't journalists, I'm just taking the standards of these journos and applying them appropriately. Listen and believe right, so if this thot thinks Andy Ngo isn't a journalist, I agree with her. So no, I don't wish anything bad happen to them by their standards.

Journalists lie, people die.
Won't feel bad if a plane carrying 200 journalists gets shot down by Iran, and then every single one of them survives but become Eternally bound to liquid food praying for their death, with arms severed that disables them from pulling the plug themselves. I'll laugh. Don't call me a monster, the MSM embedded this hatred. I like being honest, something journos hate.

Of course not all journalists are bad, just most. Similar to how 13% doesn't commit 43% of violent crimes.
I remember hearing about jorunalism being the "guard dogs of democracy". Nowdays it feels more like they are lapdogs of monopolies.

I think the problem is the rise of always online technology. In the past, you had to make a network of people, talk to strangers and investigate stuff. Even if you were (likely) shitlib, you still reminded yourself that the opposing parties are humans. Nowdays journalism is being stuck in a bubble, watching others without actually needing to communicate with them and just gorging and puking the same information already seen elsewhere (without any verification). This resulted in the average modern journalist being a psychopath who watches twitter 24/7 and believes he is some master class for holding the same opinions as the elites.
 
I remember hearing about jorunalism being the "guard dogs of democracy". Nowdays it feels more like they are lapdogs of monopolies.

I think the problem is the rise of always online technology. In the past, you had to make a network of people, talk to strangers and investigate stuff. Even if you were (likely) shitlib, you still reminded yourself that the opposing parties are humans. Nowdays journalism is being stuck in a bubble, watching others without actually needing to communicate with them and just gorging and puking the same information already seen elsewhere (without any verification). This resulted in the average modern journalist being a psychopath who watches twitter 24/7 and believes he is some master class for holding the same opinions as the elites.
Modern journalism is nothing but lies, smearing, egotism, and scumbaggery.
They won't care about the lives they've ruined through their hitpieces. They will think they are above everything, doxxxxing is okay when they do it, lying is ok when they do it, inciting violence is fine if they do it. They get to call someone Hitler but God forbid them being uninvited to his Christmas party. These people are parasites, not the beneficial type. The final solution to a termite infested house is to gas it or burn it down.

The people they fuck over aren't humans to them, it's just blood and flesh that serves as a stepping stone to more revenue and clicks.

They created the echo chamber, I hope it's filled with gas and I'll laugh at their disintegrating corpses. Each time there's journalists fired, bickering on Twitter, my response will be "learn to code, get a real job". Of course, it's a page from their book. They should read their own book and take their own advice.

If reporting on lack of niggers or trannies in Disney movies is journalism, then sure, "guard dogs of democracy". Democracy is gay anyway, so being the guard dogs of faggotry is fine with me.
 
I remember hearing about journalism being the "guard dogs of democracy". Nowdays it feels more like they are lapdogs of monopolies.
The whole "guard dogs of democracy", 4th estate bullshit is a lie journalists sold to Boomers because it was borderline impossible to spin up a rival paper post-WWII, so they could get away with it. Look into the personal legacy of people like Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst pre-WWII, and tell me it isn't textbook modern journalism. Endless propaganda for the purpose of weeding out competition and pushing ownership's pet politics.
 
If people want to say ngo isn't a journalist that's fine, but its kind of dumb, at a minimum he would be a citizen journalist. For example, the oregonian/oregonlive had to correct their headlines about protests being "peaceful" when ngo posted evidence of violence happening. this happened more than once. The oregonian "real" journalists were obviously really pissed off about this because they wouldn't even name him or his publication, just "local conservative activist" iirc. The regular way to report these things is that the real journalists take a statement from the cops, who want to look competent, and the journalists just take their word for it. Ngo is doing what journalists used to do, actually checking things out.

Anyway, I love when teenagers hide behind a rule like this in order to do things that are wrong, and then get angry when an adult doesn't play along. they need to know that a lot of rules only protect them so long as every adult decides to go along with those rules, so they should be really grateful for every time they are protected by social convention.
 
Back