🐱 Andy Ngo to testify against Antifa, Internet calls it a clown show for letting 'a vile racist' brief the panel

CatParty
Status
Not open for further replies.


Journalist Andy Ngo filed a lawsuit against far-left group Antifa on June 4 for waging a “campaign of terror and harassment” against him, just days after President Trump blamed them for inciting violence during anti-police protests. Ngo said he had been assaulted, stalked, threatened and robbed by members of the group in Portland, even suffering a brain hemorrhage after being assaulted in June 2019, according to The Washington Times.

"Antifa is an openly extremist movement with the training and intent of destabilizing this country and overthrowing our Constitution," Ngo had said during a live-streamed press conference. "The protection of foolish politicians and the media have emboldened this movement to carry out unprecedented terrorist attacks."

In the lawsuit filed at Multnomah County court in Oregon, Ngo sought at least $900,000 in damages for assault, battery, emotional distress and racketeering by those who acted to "suppress Ngo's journalism through intimidation and violence," and for "ongoing neurological and health issues." And now, Ngo is being brought in to testify against Antifa. People are rather struck with this strange turn of events and say that it doesn't make sense, saying this is a complete mockery. Ngo will be briefing the Oversight Committee on June 29.

"They seriously letting Andy Ngo testify? The guy who put together 'kill lists' for Atomwaffen?" a Twitter user noted. Another echoed this sentiment. "Andy ngo is best known for providing kill lists to atomwaffen and being a threat to our communities."

"Because we live in the stupidest timeline, sexual abuse enabler Jim Jordan has called grifter propagandist and fascist bootlicker Andy Ngo to congress to testify about the terrible, awful threat antifascism presents to the country. What a clown show," another wrote.

"Andy Ngo is a vile racist and fascist. This is scraping the barrel even lower than Candace Owens. No healthy society, least of all anything resembling a democracy, glorifies people like Andy," another person tweeted.

"Andy Ngo is the least trustworthy person to have for a briefing on antifa but I guess they were aware of that when they decided to have him, since they know he's just going to give the words they want to hear," another tweeted.

However, many others appeared to be interested in what Andy Ngo has to say. " Andy Ngo covers #Antifa violence. They've attacked him. Despite what the leftist Twitter Mob says, he is not a White Nationalist. Andy is an Asian-American. His parents came to the United States as refugees from Vietnam before he was born. I look forward to hearing from him," one wrote.

"What's wrong with Andy Ngo testifying? Antifa threw concrete milkshakes at him and punched him while he was doing his job. Oh, that's right. Everyone made him out to be nuts for warning people about Antifa. Get a grip," another journalist wrote.
 
Somehow in today's clownworld, a Vietnamese American can be a white nationalist. Just lump the Asians in with the Whites, they are all the same anyways (except China, those guys must be defended at all costs by the msm and leftwing retards).

That's until something fucked the CCP real hard and the Chinese do a 180 and throw communism in the dump and these leftists will said to the Chinese "How dare you?".
 
The article quoted four random nobodies who are against him and two random nobodies who are supporting him. Nice balance there.
The article is 8 paragraphs, 1.5 contains any actual facts, the rest is all quotes, and none of it sourced or attributed. I hate to say it, but even Kotaku would put in more effort than this.
 
antifa isnt a formal organisation that you can take to court, it's an informal and loose association of like-minded activists. this is a clown move, it's like saying "i'm gonna take anonymous to court because 4chan raided my website" lol

People keep circulating this idea that Antifa are untouchable because they don't have a formal membership list and printed, laminated official cards or something. It's an idea based on this conception that law courts are some easily exploitable computer algorithm without discernment or flexibility. It's like people think "hey, if I say I'm not something the court can't find me guilty" notion. That's not true. All a jury or a judge has to do is look at the evidence - phone calls, meet-ups, iconography, etc. and decide on balance that evidence favours it. They can take it from there in terms of who to fine, charge, etc.
 
Antifa sucks but the idea of taking a terrorist organization to court is downright hilarious. On the other hand, only in Clown World can a gay Asian man be described as a racist and fascist. Good luck getting these cowards to pay your million dollar lawsuit though.
 
Taking them to court is retarded, you aren't gonna win especially in the retarded districts this court case would take place in. Off topic but did you know you can bury a schoolbus underground in the desert and it's rather hard to be found? Just thought that was interesting and school buses are very cheap.
 
The thing I love the most about the twitter stans arguing that antifa has never killed anyone (they have, these recent riots have like a 25+ kill count) is more about antifa being incompetent than anything. They have tried to kill people (like Ngo) and savagely beaten others to the point of near death if they hadnt been taken to a hospital.

So it's less that Antifa doesnt want to kill people. It's just that they are extremely incompetent at doing so.
 
People keep circulating this idea that Antifa are untouchable because they don't have a formal membership list and printed, laminated official cards or something. It's an idea based on this conception that law courts are some easily exploitable computer algorithm without discernment or flexibility. It's like people think "hey, if I say I'm not something the court can't find me guilty" notion. That's not true. All a jury or a judge has to do is look at the evidence - phone calls, meet-ups, iconography, etc. and decide on balance that evidence favours it. They can take it from there in terms of who to fine, charge, etc.

I think it's based on the misguided notion that criminal organizations get to define themselves rather than having trained investigators do it.

I distinctly recall the mafia trying this exact tactic and it lead to the establishment of RICO laws meant specifically to take them apart. It's very difficult to fight against the Government because they can just rewrite laws and redefine words until you're in prison.
 
You still believe that shit?
Remember bike lock guy? When /pol/ went full autismo on the vidya of that incident they found several handlers in the crowd and damn near rolled up BAMN's entire leadership cadre. These cells of commies all have an organized leadership structures that provide support to the boots on the ground but make sure not to get their hands dirty.
The crossovers with others groups like the NLG and DSA are also numerous. What they will do is all be members of some gay little antifa gang but also some less controversial activist group. In this way they have the command structure of the antifa group hidden behind ostensibly legit organising. Antifa already has their play book so you don't need to be explicit in explaining what they need to do. They just bounce off of what the so called legit activists are doing and use them as cover.
 
If he brings this to court, does that mean someone ‘official’ will need to have a look at rose city antifa, their organisation and their funding? What I’m saying is that using the process of the coirt may mean that certain procedures are followed and certain questions asked - in public, by officials and with public documentation
. The answers to those questions, and where they may lead, may be what Ngo is trying to get into the public domain, rather than simply trying to get them a slap on the wrists
 
I support his lawsuit and all, but wouldn't the money be better spent hiring Blackwater or Pinkertons outright murdering these ANTIFAgs?

No, they wouldn't take such a contract on US soil. Pinkerton is owned by Allied Universal now and I wouldn't touch anything AU owns with a 10 foot pole.
 
Salon LOL

Proud Boys, far right hate group LOL.
Proud Boys are t-shirt at worst, a men's club where they drink beer at best. The only violence they participate in is when ANTIFA starts it.

The SPLC labels them a "General Hate Group" because they don't allow women in their faggy little club. It doesn't take much for the SPLC label one a hate group.
 
The axis actually included asian and black countries.

I'm aware of this but I mean fascist as in white supremacist or whatever the hell they think it means. They literally think that fascist equals racist despite the fact that fascism in itself doesn't necessarily include a racial element.

TL;DR they're retards.
 
You still believe that shit?
Remember bike lock guy? When /pol/ went full autismo on the vidya of that incident they found several handlers in the crowd and damn near rolled up BAMN's entire leadership cadre. These cells of commies all have an organized leadership structures that provide support to the boots on the ground but make sure not to get their hands dirty.

....didn't that end up leading to a few attempts to prosecute but everyone involved getting off with literally nothing happening to them specifically because nobody could tie them to any specific organizations instructions?

They are certainly an organization but its harder to prove than it sounds, and this is happening in portland of all places, where there is overwhelming support for antifa. I don't believe for a second a lawsuit is going to go anywhere. In fact i'd bet any amount of money you'd have better chances of winning the lottery while being hit by lightning than you would successfully suing antifa under literally any circumstances

Spiteful Crow said:
I distinctly recall the mafia trying this exact tactic and it lead to the establishment of RICO laws meant specifically to take them apart. It's very difficult to fight against the Government because they can just rewrite laws and redefine words until you're in prison

Yes but nobody is going to go RICO on antifa. It isn't the mafia, and if they did they would have to go after the sources of funding to do it, and that is absolutely not going to happen under any circumstances. Way too many people with money and power giving them money for that to ever happen

The entire thing is a waste of time and resources that will achieve nothing for him and if anything get a target painted on his back
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back