🐱 Andy Ngo to testify against Antifa, Internet calls it a clown show for letting 'a vile racist' brief the panel

https://meaww.com/andy-ngo-antifa-milkshake-protests-fascism-racism-journalist-testfiy-congress-trump

Journalist Andy Ngo filed a lawsuit against far-left group Antifa on June 4 for waging a “campaign of terror and harassment” against him, just days after President Trump blamed them for inciting violence during anti-police protests. Ngo said he had been assaulted, stalked, threatened and robbed by members of the group in Portland, even suffering a brain hemorrhage after being assaulted in June 2019, according to The Washington Times.

"Antifa is an openly extremist movement with the training and intent of destabilizing this country and overthrowing our Constitution," Ngo had said during a live-streamed press conference. "The protection of foolish politicians and the media have emboldened this movement to carry out unprecedented terrorist attacks."

In the lawsuit filed at Multnomah County court in Oregon, Ngo sought at least $900,000 in damages for assault, battery, emotional distress and racketeering by those who acted to "suppress Ngo's journalism through intimidation and violence," and for "ongoing neurological and health issues." And now, Ngo is being brought in to testify against Antifa. People are rather struck with this strange turn of events and say that it doesn't make sense, saying this is a complete mockery. Ngo will be briefing the Oversight Committee on June 29.

"They seriously letting Andy Ngo testify? The guy who put together 'kill lists' for Atomwaffen?" a Twitter user noted. Another echoed this sentiment. "Andy ngo is best known for providing kill lists to atomwaffen and being a threat to our communities."

"Because we live in the stupidest timeline, sexual abuse enabler Jim Jordan has called grifter propagandist and fascist bootlicker Andy Ngo to congress to testify about the terrible, awful threat antifascism presents to the country. What a clown show," another wrote.

"Andy Ngo is a vile racist and fascist. This is scraping the barrel even lower than Candace Owens. No healthy society, least of all anything resembling a democracy, glorifies people like Andy," another person tweeted.

"Andy Ngo is the least trustworthy person to have for a briefing on antifa but I guess they were aware of that when they decided to have him, since they know he's just going to give the words they want to hear," another tweeted.

However, many others appeared to be interested in what Andy Ngo has to say. " Andy Ngo covers #Antifa violence. They've attacked him. Despite what the leftist Twitter Mob says, he is not a White Nationalist. Andy is an Asian-American. His parents came to the United States as refugees from Vietnam before he was born. I look forward to hearing from him," one wrote.

"What's wrong with Andy Ngo testifying? Antifa threw concrete milkshakes at him and punched him while he was doing his job. Oh, that's right. Everyone made him out to be nuts for warning people about Antifa. Get a grip," another journalist wrote.

 

[ColtWalker1847]

....didn't that end up leading to a few attempts to prosecute but everyone involved getting off with literally nothing happening to them specifically because nobody could tie them to any specific organizations instructions?

There was enough to look into conspiracy charges it's just that it was Berkley. The DA wouldn't pursue it because it would have blown up BAMN and other lefty groups. They have political cover like you wouldn't believe down there.

They are certainly an organization but its harder to prove than it sounds, and this is happening in portland of all places, where there is overwhelming support for antifa. I don't believe for a second a lawsuit is going to go anywhere. In fact i'd bet any amount of money you'd have better chances of winning the lottery while being hit by lightning than you would successfully suing antifa under literally any circumstances

But this is civil court not criminal. If Andy can prove to a judge and jury his claims, he wins. It's worth a Lolcow & Lolcow thread at the very least.

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

Didn’t they run red and black cafe where adf got his butthole fingered by a hobo and then created controversy after someone called the police while a patron was overdosing in the bathroom

I think they were also associated with the bar where the antifa dude got ran over, and then his exceptional friends killed him trying to get him to hospital, and they all collectively refused to tell the police about the nogs involved in the beef.

https://www.opb.org/news/article/portland-oregon-police-hit-run-motive-sean-d-kealiher/

 

[Overly Serious]

I'm aware of this but I mean fascist as in white supremacist or whatever the hell they think it means. They literally think that fascist equals racist despite the fact that fascism in itself doesn't necessarily include a racial element.

TL;DR they're retards.

The Nazis really ruined fascism for everyone.

 

[Duke Nukem]

The Nazis really ruined fascism for everyone.

Funny how communism doesn't have the same stigma. But yes, in a way it did. Not that Mussolini and Franco weren't brutal as fuck, but you do have a point there.

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

People keep circulating this idea that Antifa are untouchable because they don't have a formal membership list and printed, laminated official cards or something. It's an idea based on this conception that law courts are some easily exploitable computer algorithm without discernment or flexibility. It's like people think "hey, if I say I'm not something the court can't find me guilty" notion. That's not true. All a jury or a judge has to do is look at the evidence - phone calls, meet-ups, iconography, etc. and decide on balance that evidence favours it. They can take it from there in terms of who to fine, charge, etc.

The problem is that I think we all know that the civil courts and appointed examiners assigned to such an investigation are going to either be partisan bureaucrats, or drawn from the National Lawyers Guild, and used to obfuscating the shit out of that kind of stuff.

I support his lawsuit and all, but wouldn't the money be better spent hiring Blackwater or Pinkertons outright murdering these ANTIFAgs?

If he wanted to be found guilty of conspiracy and a bunch of other shit, sure.

 

[Spiteful Crow]

Yes but nobody is going to go RICO on antifa. It isn't the mafia, and if they did they would have to go after the sources of funding to do it, and that is absolutely not going to happen under any circumstances. Way too many people with money and power giving them money for that to ever happen

The entire thing is a waste of time and resources that will achieve nothing for him and if anything get a target painted on his back

No we're using terrorism laws. Do you even watch the news or do you just vomit out autism?

Here's some assistance

 

[pwnest injun]

Rose City AntiFA sells fucking t-shirts. They are a branded LLC, and their leadership is openly and provably involved in property destruction and assault.

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

hes also a retard for filing a fucking lawsuit against "antifa" lmao

antifa isnt a formal organisation that you can take to court, it's an informal and loose association of like-minded activists. this is a clown move, it's like saying "i'm gonna take anonymous to court because 4chan raided my website" lol

He'd do a lot better to sue Portland's Mayor and council for ordering PPD to stand down every time these commie pukes show up to riot and intimidate.

 

[TowinKarz]

The problem is that I think we all know that the civil courts and appointed examiners assigned to such an investigation are going to either be partisan bureaucrats, or drawn from the National Lawyers Guild, and used to obfuscating the shit out of that kind of stuff.



If he wanted to be found guilty of conspiracy and a bunch of other shit, sure.

Civil cases are still decided by juries unless you opt out and seek a bench trial or arbitration. I don't know what you're talking about here with "partisan bureaucrats" and "drawn from the guild" stuff..... the civil court doesn't "appoint" an examiner to decide what happens.

You, as the plaintiff, make your case, through your lawyer.

The defendants make their case, through theirs.

A civil jury of 12 hears both sides, plus evidence, and rules if there were damages and, if so, how much should be awarded.

There is no weird kind of quasi-court here where some appointed ANTIFA member is the Judge.... and can throw it out "because I don't like you" on day 1....

Will ANTIFA get the best lawyers they can to try and fight this? Backed by money from people who have a vetted interest in letting them continue to own the streets of Portland and beyond at times? Sure. But you seem to be under the impression that Ngo has to argue his case in front of some kangaroo court of leftists that in no way matches reality.

Seriously, what are you on about here?

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

Antifa in Portland is basically the Ku Klux Klan in 1950s Birmingham and have a fuckton of sympathizers and people who readily believe Andy Ngo is a dangerous Nazi. The only difference is it's harder to get a jury of 12 Antifa than a jury of 12 whites to rig the case.

 

[Linako 2.0]

can a gay Asian man be described as a racist and fascist.

 

[Scarlett Johansson]

As he is a homosexual I'm surprised he hasn't used that in this case

 

[frozenrunner]

View attachment 1414751

"The cishet white boi fears the samurai's gay blade."

 

[Snekposter]

"All communists fear the samurai."
EDIT:

Dude getting his just desserts for being a commie fag is Inejiro Asanuma.

 

[DumbDude42]

Civil cases are still decided by juries unless you opt out and seek a bench trial or arbitration. I don't know what you're talking about here with "partisan bureaucrats" and "drawn from the guild" stuff..... the civil court doesn't "appoint" an examiner to decide what happens.

You, as the plaintiff, make your case, through your lawyer.

The defendants make their case, through theirs.

A civil jury of 12 hears both sides, plus evidence, and rules if there were damages and, if so, how much should be awarded.

There is no weird kind of quasi-court here where some appointed ANTIFA member is the Judge.... and can throw it out "because I don't like you" on day 1....

Will ANTIFA get the best lawyers they can to try and fight this? Backed by money from people who have a vetted interest in letting them continue to own the streets of Portland and beyond at times? Sure. But you seem to be under the impression that Ngo has to argue his case in front of some kangaroo court of leftists that in no way matches reality.

Seriously, what are you on about here?

you're assuming it will go to jury trial at all, but it's a long and stony road to even get there, with dozens of possible ways to get the case thrown out as frivolous or meritless by the court before any juror even hears of it

 

[BlazikenLover]

I'm aware of this but I mean fascist as in white supremacist or whatever the hell they think it means. They literally think that fascist equals racist despite the fact that fascism in itself doesn't necessarily include a racial element.

TL;DR they're retards.

I had a lefty trying to lecture me on fascism when I said plenty fascist regimes were left wing, he claimed that there was a huge difference between being authoritarian and fascism since the latter had a racist component.
The guy was a highschool dropout.

 

[Meat Target]

I had a lefty trying to lecture me on fascism when I said plenty fascist regimes were left wing, he claimed that there was a huge difference between being authoritarian and fascism since the latter had a racist component.
The guy was a highschool dropout.

Read the Nazi Party's 25-Point Economic Plan. Remove the racial tinge to it and it becomes minutes from a Portland city council meeting.

 

[Dr Cruel]

hes also a retard for filing a fucking lawsuit against "antifa" lmao

antifa isnt a formal organisation that you can take to court, it's an informal and loose association of like-minded activists. this is a clown move, it's like saying "i'm gonna take anonymous to court because 4chan raided my website" lol

You mean, it's like taking the Ku Klux Klan to court. Just some loosely organized gang of nuts and fruitcakes that serve as the militant wing of the Democrat Party.

 

[Dr Cruel]

The key difference between Rose City Antifa/Torch Network and the Gambino Crime Family in this case is the activist angle, since Antifa tries to present itself as a political activist movement and RCA as a specific activist group in that movement.

There's also the Torch Network, which exists openly as a coalition of Antifa activist groups.

Given how a lot of activist groups (especially left-wing ones) tend to file for non-profit status, I think there's enough grounds for a viable lawsuit since Andy Ngo is specifically going after Rose City Antifa and possibly specific named individuals within it as opposed to the wider Antifa movement as a whole.

If it's impossible to prosecute or sue an openly public gang of Left fascists who torch businesses, terrorize shopkeepers and take pot shots at the cops, why bother having a legal system at all? Just go the way of El Salvador - form "peace" squads, seek out members of the organization and treat them the same way Trotsky would.

 

[cactus]

You mean, it's like taking the Ku Klux Klan to court. Just some loosely organized gang of nuts and fruitcakes that serve as the militant wing of the Democrat Party.

If it's impossible to prosecute or sue an openly public gang of Left fascists who torch businesses, terrorize shopkeepers and take pot shots at the cops, why bother having a legal system at all? Just go the way of El Salvador - form "peace" squads, seek out members of the organization and treat them the same way Trotsky would.

This thread is over 2 years old, why in the hell are you responding to it anything in? Are you a newfag or something?