Anita Sarkeesian on a VidCon panel about bullying: Sargon of Akkad is a garbage human shithead. - Sitting in a chair is now harassment

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Anita isn't really a lolcow so much as a scammer, with her history of shilling everything from Pick Up Artists to Feminism to whatever might get her mug on a camera. However, her reactions to not getting her way are funny, as are the frothing rage of the nerds who have aneurysms when they hear her name.

Consider this a general Anita AND detractor salt thread.
 
as are the frothing rage of the nerds who have aneurysms when they hear her name.

Her haters consider her a feminist Hitler (when she could charitably be better compared to Lionel Hutz). Likewise, her followers are equally lol-worthy, defending her against even the slighted criticism, despite having zero to gain other than being able to label themselves "good little feminists".

Anita is a sideshow attraction, where the audience is just as amusing as the spectacle. If you take any of it seriously, you're doing it wrong.
 
I think people here don't want to give her attention since she profits so much on it. She also seems more like a knowledgeable scammer than a loony person unlike Quinn or Wu. However after watching her at the two Vidcon panels she is getting into Lolcow territory now. Going so long with her claims going unchallenged caused her to only go more crazy with her rhetoric.

Agreed, this is honestly the first time I've seen Anita truly sperg out. Everything else she's ever done has seemed very deliberate, and so she never seemed much like a cow.

I remember having this exact conversation when i was still still involved GG hangouts, she was a big name but she never stepped directly in shit unlike most other anti-gg's who don't have nearly as much name recognition.


Philip DeFranco made a video talking about VidCon, featuring the Sarkeesian bullshit.

Think back to late 2014 when Philip, Sargon and a dozen other people like them either didn't have even close to the notoriety that Anita had at the time or were not on YouTube at all and now have much larger followings and influence then she had at her height. You'll realize why seeing these people in "her space" got to her, no amount of money or invitations to pointless tech panels will ease that sting.
 
Think back to late 2014 when Philip, Sargon and a dozen other people like them either didn't have even close to the notoriety that Anita had at the time or were not on YouTube at all and now have much larger followings and influence then she had at her height. You'll realize why seeing these people in "her space" got to her, no amount of money or invitations to pointless tech panels will ease that sting.
When you frame it like that, I realize I know some actual, non-internet people often mentioning or talking about DeFranco, especially as a non bullshit quick news source. Whereas I've never heard anyone mention Sarkeesian, even at the height of Gamergate or her UN fiasco.
 
Her haters consider her a feminist Hitler (when she could charitably be better compared to Lionel Hutz). Likewise, her followers are equally lol-worthy, defending her against even the slighted criticism, despite having zero to gain other than being able to label themselves "good little feminists".

Anita is a sideshow attraction, where the audience is just as amusing as the spectacle. If you take any of it seriously, you're doing it wrong.

I'd say she's closer to Mr. Crabs than the honorable Mr. Hutz
 
Anita Sarkeesian has incited her fanbase to harass Sargon of Akkad when she identified him in the audience.

(For some reason this cybernetic bear dude seems to only have the good cut available on youtube)


Sargon is now motioning for Anita to be removed as an official speaker for violating the convention's code of conduct which forbids such behavior.

Here's his official response on the matter:

To paraphrase Kissinger: "It's a pity they can't both lose."
 
I know I just posted about how irrelevant she is but the Vidcon people just released a response and they're begging her for forgiveness
https://twitter.com/hankgreen/status/879757427335458820

Given how SJW infected I'd always considered Vidcon this was actually more balanced than I'd have expected.

I'm also now expecting (okay, hoping for) a MASSIVE wave of salt from Sarkeesian and company over the fact that Vidcon's response wasn't full-on "Listen and Believe." Though I guess that presupposes anyone actually giving a shit about Sarkeesian in 2017, we shall see.
 
IMG_7390.jpg
 
After five years or so I am still amazed how much protection she gets in the media. She can do no wrong ever.

Well, we have to protect the womenfolk of course! We have to keep them sheltered and locked up in our towers, away from all the bad names and hurtful feelings because harsh criticism and disagreement is the worst thing ever - it's like being faced raped with invisible penis-words! We can't have the womenfolk cry and hurt because that will make us mad, sad, with the bad feelings too and such!

...okay, got to stop writing like that; I'm tasting blood...
 
Ha ha, I bet Thunderfoot is super jelly that Anita didn't pick a fight with him instead and now Sargon gets all the web traffic
Sargon has done a few videos on her. Dunderfeet has made what, hundreds? Anita would know this. So it isnt about who hates Anita the hardest, its about who she considers a credible threat.

None of these people are that stupid. So yes. Dunderfeet is mad.
This was one of the worst things she could have done at that panel; I mean all she had to do was not take the bait and ignore him. Regardless, she will probably come out of this without a scratch, she wont mention it on social media and I doubt the vidcon organisers will remove her.
Shes an amateur. They all are. If they had a hair on the old guard, Gamergate would never have exploded, and Zoe Quinn would just be a piece of juicy internet drama.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back