AP- Piglets will be left to starve in a controversial art exhibit in Denmark - "something is rotten in the state of Denmark"

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Link Archive
By VANESSA GERA
Updated 1:20 PM EST, February 28, 2025


An artist in Denmark aims to raise awareness of the suffering caused by modern pig production with an art installation that opened Friday that includes three piglets who will be denied food and water and will starve to death.

Chilean-born Marco Evaristti is courting controversy to make a point about the treatment of pigs in Denmark, where about 25,000 piglets die daily as a result of the conditions in which they are bred.
The central exhibit at Copenhagen’s “And Now You Care” exhibition is a makeshift cage created with shopping carts containing three piglets. As the exhibition opened Friday evening, they were still fine, but they will not be given food and drink, and can be expected to die of hunger within a few days.
Evaristti says on his Instagram page that the exhibition “is a confrontation with Denmark’s bloody reality” in slaughterhouses, and that he urges people to reduce their meat consumption and support agriculture that improves animal welfare.

Denmark’s largest and oldest animal welfare organization, Animal Protection Denmark, says it is grateful for Evaristti’s interest in the problem, but disagrees with how he wants to convey it.


“We completely understand the indignation” of the artist, said Birgitte Damm, a spokesperson for the organization. “But we do not agree that three piglets, three individual living beings, should be starved and prevented from drinking until they die from it. It is illegal and it is abuse of the animals.”


“The fact that happens to thousands each day in the industry doesn’t make it right,” she said. But she also praised the artist for asking “the large questions about who we are as human beings or want to be, and what we are doing to fellow creatures in the name of enormous amounts of mass-produced cheap meat.”

Damm explained that sows are bred in the Danish pig industry to produce about 20 piglets at a time, but only have 14 teats, forcing the piglets to compete for breastmilk, and leading to the starvation of many. She said some 25,000 piglets die every day from starvation or the result of the conditions in which they are held in Denmark.

It’s not Evaristti’s first controversial project.

One of his projects included goldfish in blenders, tempting viewers to press the button and create goldfish soup.

In 2006 he used some of his own body fat removed via liposuction to prepare meatballs, and then ate some of them.

He described that project called “Polpette Al Grasso Di Marco” as a critique on people overconsuming and then buying their way to slimness with liposuction, and at the same time an attempt to transcend the taboo of cannibalism.
 
We put zero value on the lives of livestock animals
If that were true, cage-free and free range wouldn’t be a thing. It really isn’t an either/or argument here, humans evolved to what we are thanks to the benefits of eating meat, and to just completely stop that habit of millions of years is quite unreasonable. Nobody who eats meat beyond children hasn’t been informed already of the costs of doing so, this stunt did nothing to open anyone’s eyes nor brought awareness to unnecessary cruelty no one knew about. People will still have faith that the system is working to be as humane as possible and that no animals are being bred just to suffer which would be unprofitable. So, in summation, it was all for naught. I bet not even Reddit cares about this melodramatic theatric anymore. Hell is the artist even a vegan himself?
 
How, he announced a thing, people called him retarded and stopped it, now they’ll forget about it in two days without any impact to their choices whatsoever. That‘s not succeeding, hell I am eating a hot dog as I type this.
The goal of all art is to elicit an emotional response, whether it be the great paintings of yore or this bullshit. This man set out to shock and disgust, and in that, he has succeeded.
 
The goal of all art is to elicit an emotional response, whether it be the great paintings of yore or this bullshit. This man set out to shock and disgust, and in that, he has succeeded.
Some response, people have already moved on. Art, GOOD art, leaves an impression. This will not. Hell even mattress girl was more impactful.

I guess the kike can feel smug about that time he caught a headline, I bet while eating meat. Kikes are hypocrites like that.
 
People will still have faith that the system is working to be as humane as possible
Exactly. They have faith that a system is doing something it absolutely is not doing, and this guy's tried to draw attention to that. He's showing you that your faith is only protecting you. Veal calves still exist, extra animals are left to starve or ground up alive (chicks). Everyone crying out against this piece who hasn't tried to steal the piglets themselves is just doing the old "That's terrible! Somebody ought to DO SOMETHING about it." Who then? Not you, of course - it's just too inconvenient for you. There's nothing you can do about it, right? Once again all it takes is for supposed "good men" to do nothing.
mattress girl was more impactful.
Not really. She actively obstructed justice, no?
 
Reddit post
It's not productive for everyone to be so angry about being faced with facts of their own reality. This is like being angry that animals starve to death or die of terrible illness and infection in the wild, except those situations are completely out of your own control. There's nothing wrong with eating meat, but it's very "no ethical consumption under capitalism therefore I use ubereats and netflix on my iphone all day" to be so angry about admitting that the meat industry is unforgivably cruel. Your clothes and wedding rings come from horrible circumstances too, it's okay to just admit that you're fine with that. I'm not a judge in a court of law and neither is this Danish art gallery. You are free to say that blocking the pain and torture from your mind so you can eat delicious steaks is an acceptable way of life for you.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: isalaide
Reddit is quite sex positive and probably all for this kind of theatrical activism, just like you actually.

It's not productive for everyone to be so angry about being faced with facts of their own reality. This is like being angry that animals starve to death or die of terrible illness and infection in the wild, except those situations are completely out of your own control. There's nothing wrong with eating meat, but it's very "no ethical consumption under capitalism therefore I use ubereats and netflix on my iphone all day" to be so angry about admitting that the meat industry is unforgivably cruel. Your clothes and wedding rings come from horrible circumstances too, it's okay to just admit that you're fine with that. I'm not a judge in a court of law and neither is this Danish art gallery. You are free to say that blocking the pain and torture from your mind so you can eat delicious steaks is an acceptable way of life for you.

See this is where you fail in logic. This kind of ‘all or nothing’ thinking can only come from some college-brained idiot with no real world experience or ability to think beyond cartoon-level morality. You can accept that factory farming can be cruel, you can work to change it, you can even be advocates for better practices. And you can still eat meat because that’s what the human body is designed to do. Your whole thinking is ‘if it isn’t perfect it must be destroyed now now NOW’ and that is hilarious and immature. No one is angry, the retard was stopped and we moved on beyond the kvetching of his couple of sycophants. But if you feel the need to be smug over internet bants I guess keep going off, it’s still mildly amusing.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps some good news: someone took the piglets away.

WP article / archive


Three piglets were left to starve in an art exhibition. Then they vanished.

Marco Evaristti’s provocative exhibition in Copenhagen was designed to protest Denmark’s pork industry. But then there was a twist — and an act of sabotage.
By Vivian Ho

The outrage sparked by the exhibition in Copenhagen’s Meatpacking District was immediate and fierce, just as the artist had intended.

Marco Evaristti had planned to display three live piglets, caged in two shopping carts, which he would then leave to starve to death to “open the eyes of society” to what he called the cruelty of Denmark’s pork industry. “I wanted to sacrifice three piglets to save” the tens of thousands killed each day, Evaristti said in an interview. Denmark, one of the world’s leading exporters of pork, in 2020 had a mortality rate in piglets’ first weeks of life of about 23 percent, meaning that more than 25,000 piglets died each day, according to Aarhus University’s Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences.

[A video of a piglet called Benjamin cannot be archived]
Benjamin is among three other piglets rescued after being left to starve in a Danish art exhibition.

Evaristti opened the exhibition, “And Now You Care?,” on Friday, amid death threats and public anger. A Danish politician called him a pervert. An animal rights advocacy group said it reported him to the police.

But the exhibit never reached its grisly denouement. The next morning, following a visit by another animal welfare group, Evaristti found that it was his exhibition that was now dead — the piglets at the heart of his showcase were missing.

He called the police to report the theft, only to be confronted by another twist in the tale a few days later: It had been a member of his own team who had contacted a representative with the Organization Against the Suffering of Animals (OASA) to spirit away the three piglets.

c38367d20eda334a8c15eed3b108e3fa38a706b4.jpg
Police examine the exhibition before its opening this past Friday.

In an interview with The Washington Post on Wednesday, Evaristti said that even with the outrage, the piglets’ disappearance and the moral dilemma posed by the entire exhibition, he had never wavered from his original intent. “I wanted them to die,” Evaristti said. “I wanted the people in Denmark to see how a piglet starves to death.”

Denmark is home to about 5,000 pig farms that produce an estimated 28 million pigs yearly, according to the Danish Food and Agriculture Council. About 90 percent of all production is exported, making up 5 percent of the country’s total exports.

With such high demand, farmers have begun breeding sows to produce larger litters, which has led to an increase in piglet mortality, according to the Aarhus University researchers.

Evaristti had thought everyone who had worked with him to put together the exhibition supported its message. But then on Tuesday, OASA issued a statement revealing that they had been working with a colleague of Evaristti to rescue the pigs and that “there was no burglary or theft.”

“We have directed an inquiry to the Copenhagen Police to shed light on the course of the case and secured documentation that no criminal action has been taken,” the statement reads.

After reading the statement, Evaristti knew immediately whom the colleague was. “It was Casper,” Evaristti said nonchalantly. A male voice sounded in the background: “It was me.”

Evaristti passed the phone to Casper Steffensen, who admitted that he had been feeding the piglets even when he wasn’t supposed to, after the exhibition opened. “I didn’t realize how much I’d get attached to these piglets,” said Steffensen, a filmmaker who has been working with Evaristti on a documentary for the past five years.

Like Evaristti, Steffensen had been dedicated to the message of the exhibition. But Steffensen had also been in charge of taking care of the three piglets before the exhibition opened. “They were so cute,” he said. He brought his two children to feed and play with the piglets. “My daughter is 10 and she was asking me with tears in her eyes if they were really going to starve to death,” Steffensen said. “I told her they had to starve to death because we had to show everyone in Denmark what is happening. It broke my heart.”

When approached by a representative from OASA after the first night, he was adamant that he couldn’t damage Evaristti’s exhibition by handing the piglets over, but then he found he couldn’t sleep. “I was constantly thinking about those three piglets,” he said. He called the representative the next morning and told him to come before Evaristti arrived at the gallery.
“I made a quick and stupid decision that I’m very proud of,” Steffensen said.

Evaristti called the police soon after he discovered the disappearance. Steffensen had told him that he had left the door unlocked when he went to the restroom, and returned to find the pigs gone.
Copenhagen Police confirmed in an email to The Washington Post that its officers had received a report about the piglets being stolen on Saturday, and also reports of death threats related to the exhibition.

Both Evaristti and Steffensen were adamant that the piglets’ disappearance was not a preplanned publicity stunt. The two have put the incident behind them as they look forward to the next phase of the exhibition. They say they plan on stealing the bodies of dead piglets from one of the country’s many farms, and displaying those in a glass refrigerator as a way to drive the message forward.

“The project is not going to die,” Evaristti said. “I want to warn Danish people that the rest of the world now knows exactly who we are. We are barbaric, and they have to be ashamed.”
The kidnapped piglets are “thriving” in OASA’s care, “like bouncing little puppies,” campaign leader Valentina Crast said in an email.
 
“The project is not going to die,” Evaristti said. “I want to warn Danish people that the rest of the world now knows exactly who we are. We are barbaric, and they have to be ashamed.”
Wrong, Jew stalker child. It is you who is barbaric. Enjoy actual negative publicity prison.

Watch as the Danish police arrest the pig saviors, instead of Mr. Serial Killer for animal cruelty. Someone needs to check his hard drive.
 
Last edited:
Fun fact: pigs raised for meat in Denmark routinely have their feet amputated as babies to limit their movement in their stalls and prevent them damaging their meat with their own hooves.

Countries other than Denmark produce bacon. By law, the country of production is right there on the packet, in case you'd like to check before you buy.
 
They say they plan on stealing the bodies of dead piglets from one of the country’s many farms, and displaying those in a glass refrigerator as a way to drive the message forward.
Minus the stealing, I feel like they should have done this from the start. The starving of piglets doesn't make sense, but displaying a carcass that came from a sick animal would make sense given the conditions of factory farms.

Then again, Upton Sinclair brought attention to it 120 years ago, and you didn't need to be exposed to it directly to understand at least some of the problems he mentioned. Seeing it might hit a bit different from reading about it, though.

Additionally, I feel like someone stealing the animals back and trying to keep them happy and healthy is a message in and of itself. Some humans are completely indifferent to their suffering, and with factory farming, everything is min-maxed to make lots of money. There will be people who take matters into their own hands to do something about it, even on a small scale.
 
Back