AP- Piglets will be left to starve in a controversial art exhibit in Denmark - "something is rotten in the state of Denmark"

Link Archive
By VANESSA GERA
Updated 1:20 PM EST, February 28, 2025


An artist in Denmark aims to raise awareness of the suffering caused by modern pig production with an art installation that opened Friday that includes three piglets who will be denied food and water and will starve to death.

Chilean-born Marco Evaristti is courting controversy to make a point about the treatment of pigs in Denmark, where about 25,000 piglets die daily as a result of the conditions in which they are bred.
The central exhibit at Copenhagen’s “And Now You Care” exhibition is a makeshift cage created with shopping carts containing three piglets. As the exhibition opened Friday evening, they were still fine, but they will not be given food and drink, and can be expected to die of hunger within a few days.
Evaristti says on his Instagram page that the exhibition “is a confrontation with Denmark’s bloody reality” in slaughterhouses, and that he urges people to reduce their meat consumption and support agriculture that improves animal welfare.

Denmark’s largest and oldest animal welfare organization, Animal Protection Denmark, says it is grateful for Evaristti’s interest in the problem, but disagrees with how he wants to convey it.


“We completely understand the indignation” of the artist, said Birgitte Damm, a spokesperson for the organization. “But we do not agree that three piglets, three individual living beings, should be starved and prevented from drinking until they die from it. It is illegal and it is abuse of the animals.”


“The fact that happens to thousands each day in the industry doesn’t make it right,” she said. But she also praised the artist for asking “the large questions about who we are as human beings or want to be, and what we are doing to fellow creatures in the name of enormous amounts of mass-produced cheap meat.”

Damm explained that sows are bred in the Danish pig industry to produce about 20 piglets at a time, but only have 14 teats, forcing the piglets to compete for breastmilk, and leading to the starvation of many. She said some 25,000 piglets die every day from starvation or the result of the conditions in which they are held in Denmark.

It’s not Evaristti’s first controversial project.

One of his projects included goldfish in blenders, tempting viewers to press the button and create goldfish soup.

In 2006 he used some of his own body fat removed via liposuction to prepare meatballs, and then ate some of them.

He described that project called “Polpette Al Grasso Di Marco” as a critique on people overconsuming and then buying their way to slimness with liposuction, and at the same time an attempt to transcend the taboo of cannibalism.
 
So just steal the piglets you useless faggots. Stop letting idiots be idiots.
This is obviously the artist's intention as well. He's just showing everyone what fucking whiny pissbabies they are, completely detached from the reality of the meat they demand at every meal. Save the piglets or kill your own food, faggots.
Jesus...

If you need to make a controversial artistic statement, can't you just nail a bologna sandwich to a wall or something else that's conventionally retarded? This is just mean.
Sorry but again, if you don't want him to hurt the piglets just steal them from the art gallery. This forum's full of Americans who eat meat at every meal and also sometimes in their dessert who wouldn't last 30 seconds on the upside-down-chicken-throat-slitting-before-they-get-electrocuted line where your face sometimes gets squirted with pus if you nick a pustule that's formed around the base of a feather. If you're not prepared to captive bolt a cow or shoot a pig then you don't deserve to eat it, and unironically need to be a vegan.
 
Sorry but again, if you don't want him to hurt the piglets just steal them from the art gallery. This forum's full of Americans who eat meat at every meal and also sometimes in their dessert who wouldn't last 30 seconds on the upside-down-chicken-throat-slitting-before-they-get-electrocuted line where your face sometimes gets squirted with pus if you nick a pustule that's formed around the base of a feather. If you're not prepared to captive bolt a cow or shoot a pig then you don't deserve to eat it, and unironically need to be a vegan.
A lot of people do do those jobs. A lot of people subsistence hunt. But this isn't about what is necessary in the process of getting meat. It's about how needlessly cruel this individual was going to be just for shock value. There are endless ways to raise awareness about cruel conditions and this wasn't one of them. And the piglets were stolen by some sensible Norwegians so he couldn't follow through with it.

Performance art is usually some crazy, histrionic retard being crazy and histrionic. Nothing more.

Also, animals raised for meat don't starve. That makes no sense. They'd have little to no meat to eat then. It's all just really dumb.
 
A lot of people do do those jobs. A lot of people subsistence hunt. But this isn't about what is necessary in the process of getting meat. It's about how needlessly cruel this individual was going to be just for shock value. There are endless ways to raise awareness about cruel conditions and this wasn't one of them. And the piglets were stolen by some sensible Norwegians so he couldn't follow through with it.

Performance art is usually some crazy, histrionic retard being crazy and histrionic. Nothing more.

Also, animals raised for meat don't starve. That makes no sense. They'd have little to no meat to eat then. It's all just really dumb.
I disagree. In the cartoon thread, we talk about how shows and comics suck nowadays because no one leaves the house to experience anything that they can then write about. People are more detached from their food than ever, to an absurd degree. It literally magically appears on your doorstep when you press a button on your tiny TV you watch in bed. Actual useful art has a tangible, measurable impact on the world and should actually accomplish something.
This man has succeeded. He's made a successful art piece that does something more than put Supermario in the Aliens power loader with a speech bubble that says "Trans Rights". Most artists are just comic book illustrators or furry porn commission-takers or dentist's-office-wall-decorators, which is fucking awesome IMO since you're making a living doing what you love.
But almost all of the leftists and fat chicks on the internet and at your country's top art school will never admit that they don't accomplish anything and don't contribute shit to "the discourse", to changing the public's view of anything in the world, and even the ones that want to are too scared to do anything with actual consequences or that might make somebody mad at them.

It's about how needlessly cruel this individual was going to be just for shock value.
So this cruelty is only a problem when it's three piglets for an art show? You don't think that if that's so horrifying to you, that maybe you should think about extending your compassion to the millions of animals who suffer in factory farms and janky, inefficient killing floors? You're angry that he's removed the teeny tiny almost-justification you had for ignoring that suffering and animal cruelty and putting you all face-to-face with what you consider both acceptable and necessary so that you can have convenient ready-to-eat meat at the store. He's showing you directly the way your choices and demands upset the very balance of nature, how you and others who consider themselves "based" still live on a massive foundation of exploitation and torture for the sake of your own personal laziness - a simple English Wikipedia article of "meat industry". You're offended that he's saying the quiet part loud, that you're exactly the same as the vegans you laugh at but the fear of losing one single taste on your tongue oh noes now I have to eat a vegetable burger with aged cheddar the horror is greater than your love for those cute little piglets you're suddenly soooo upset about, which makes you a bigger pussy than the smelliest, blond-dreadlockiest, soy-sausage-smoking, most anti-war vegetarian in all of Berkeley.

IRL example: There was a student at the art school in Toronto (a friend taught there) who used to make papercraft/origami pieces, fill a room with them, then once the show was full she'd walk around and start crumpling and breaking them all, to the horror of the other hipsters who didn't know it was her own shit. They'd be shocked/confused until she asked them "Well, were you going to take it home? If it stayed here would you come look at it every day? Did you think about how long it took to fold and assemble thousands of tiny squares of paper until just now when you saw how quickly it can be completely destroyed?" She also let everyone know that there were no "do not touch signs" and they were free to pick up the cubes and dodecahedrons and throw them to each other. I'm not totally sure what that message was but she was still a student and has probably developed it more by now. It was also fun to play with paper footsoccer balls and funny to realize what rules we set for ourselves in day to day life that we never question even if they're coming from our own minds/imagination.
 
Last edited:
Jesus...

If you need to make a controversial artistic statement, can't you just nail a bologna sandwich to a wall or something else that's conventionally retarded? This is just mean.
Last time someone nailed something onto a building in Europe it didn't end well.

But I completely agree. There are other ways to bring attention to the ugly side of factory farming that doesn't make you a monster yourself. Hell, at least the pigs in factory farming serve a purpose. At least someone will be grateful for their sacrifice when they eat. But this is just a waste.
 
How, he announced a thing, people called him retarded and stopped it, now they’ll forget about it in two days without any impact to their choices whatsoever. That‘s not succeeding, hell I am eating a hot dog as I type this.
Succeeded in the sense of a "successful artwork", like what they say in the art school. His art did the thing it was supposed to do (before pussies stopped the pigs from dying).
There are other ways to bring attention to the ugly side of factory farming that doesn't make you a monster yourself.
It's already too late for that. If you're buying that meat you're already that monster, and you're grasping at straws here to deny it. Just like calling Admiral Levine "she" makes you just as culpable in troonism as Kathy Rumer, I think you're all missing the point that he's making, or perhaps wilfully denying it. You already show your personal support of "the ugly side of factory farming" when you vote for it with your wallet every day at the store.
The men in this thread are being real fat gaping vaginas today, I have to say. If you can't say straight-up what you're happy to pay for then you don't deserve to eat it. You don't have to work in that factory, just don't pretend like you're not already torturing piglets.
Also, animals raised for meat don't starve. That makes no sense. They'd have little to no meat to eat then.
They're supposedly representing the extra piglets in a litter that don't get eaten. RTFQ, it's explained in the article, tard.
 
Last edited:
Succeeded in the sense of a "successful artwork", like what they say in the art school. His art did the thing it was supposed to do (before pussies stopped the pigs from dying).

It's already too late for that. If you're buying that meat you're already that monster, and you're grasping at straws here to deny it. Just like calling Admiral Levine "she" makes you just as culpable in troonism as Kathy Rumer, I think you're all missing the point that he's making, or perhaps wilfully denying it. You already show your personal support of "the ugly side of factory farming" when you vote for it with your wallet every day at the store.
The men in this thread are being real fat gaping vaginas today, I have to say. If you can't say straight-up what you're happy to pay for then you don't deserve to eat it. You don't have to work in that factory, just don't pretend like you're not already torturing piglets.

They're supposedly representing the extra piglets in a litter that don't get eaten. RTFQ, it's explained in the article, tard.
Nah, not buying it. It’s just a sadistic attention whore hiding behind ‘art’ to publicly practice his own fetishes and get asspats for it. Your bloviating gunt guarding is just sophist nonsense to play internet intellectual on a shitposting agricultural gossip forum. Sorry.
 
Nah, not buying it. It’s just a sadistic attention whore hiding behind ‘art’ to publicly practice his own fetishes and get asspats for it. Your bloviating gunt guarding is just sophist nonsense to play internet intellectual on a shitposting agricultural gossip forum. Sorry.
I will accept this assessment if you are one of those vegans I've heard so much about. Otherwise you're just whining that a guy tortured animals in public instead of in the windowless building where you pay him to do it.
 
I will accept this assessment if you are one of those vegans I've heard so much about. Otherwise you're just whining that a guy tortured animals in public instead of in the windowless building where you pay him to do it.
No thanks, your black & white narrow minded ideology is silly and immature and unreflective of modern realities. Thanks for trying though.
 
The central exhibit at Copenhagen’s “And Now You Care” exhibition is a makeshift cage created with shopping carts containing three piglets. As the exhibition opened Friday evening, they were still fine, but they will not be given food and drink, and can be expected to die of hunger within a few days.
Yeah, because usually when we kill animals it's to provide either food or a useful product like leather. There's a point to it. Starving a bunch of animals to death and then (presumably, the article doesn't say) doing nothing with their remains is just pointless. This is the kind of performative modern art that's not even good as a statement, because it fundamentally misses the point of whatever it's commenting on.
 
I don't feel like reading an article about horrendous animal abuse at the moment, but if he didn't call this "Ham-let", I will be sorely disappointed with his failure.

Also, can I start an art installation where people force troons to commit suicide to raise awareness of the 41%?
 
Back