Are atheists afraid of hell / punishment for the wicked after death?

Not unless you're a monk.
You don't have to pray or worship anything, that has nothing to do with attaining enlightenment. Gautama himself said this, the Unanswerable Questions are meant to stay that way, they're just a distraction.
yeah but what has the japs, chinese and korean buddhisrs doing (some) prayers/chants, and the 8 hells?

im probably wrong but ive met lay people doing the chants in the morning and night. the hell thing is real as well.
 
yeah but what has the japs, chinese and korean buddhisrs doing (some) prayers/chants, and the 8 hells?

im probably wrong but ive met lay people doing the chants in the morning and night. the hell thing is real as well.

I think some people just inherently want to do that stuff.
Plus lots of schools interpret the words of the sutras and buddhas differently, different lifestyles, different diets, different outlooks. Buddhism isn't one solitary monolith of a religion like protstantism.
 
Could this be a motive in disbelief in a God? Discuss.

Example - someone like Ted Bundy, Jeffery Dahmer, etc - would have a lot of motive to hope that there is no God.
I just realized that you mentioned Dahmer. He was baptized as a born again Christian before being beaten to death in prison. My guess is that he hoped to be forgiven by an impossibly forgiving God.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: The Fool
I think some people just inherently want to do that stuff.
Plus lots of schools interpret the words of the sutras and buddhas differently, different lifestyles, different diets, different outlooks.
thats true for every religion, sufi vs wahabi.
Buddhism isn't one solitary monolith of a religion like protstantism.
protestantism isnt a monolith either, charismatic vs cessationist reformed.
 
Why is there a hell if there is no god? I genuinely don't understand how an atheist could believe hell exists, but god doesn't? The existence of hell is proof of a gods existence because some being has to create rules by which someone enters hell.
You can believe in karma as a natural cycle of the universe without believing in a religion. You might call it spiritualism if you want to but until we know what makes us conscious and how that turns on or off there is room for debate on what happens when we die. If we're organic machines everything turns off and we're done. There's a lot of research into super natural events related to dying and not all of those are religious in nature. If I believe in karma and think high emotions can leave traces on material (Record player theory), what is to say that the consciousness experiencing them isn't reliving those moments over and over as a form of Hell? People have PTSD and their consciousness is dragged back to their abuse completely removing them from reality in some cases. If consciousness lives beyond the body as a recording, it would create a form of eventual torture where your mind is trapped in those bad moments forever.

I don't believe this myself. It's a mixture of different paranormal investigation theories added to a belief in karma as a natural law. There are people out there who do believe in very similar things and there's no way to prove or disprove it until we better understand consciousness and the brain.
 
You can believe in karma as a natural cycle of the universe without believing in a religion. You might call it spiritualism if you want to but until we know what makes us conscious and how that turns on or off there is room for debate on what happens when we die. If we're organic machines everything turns off and we're done. There's a lot of research into super natural events related to dying and not all of those are religious in nature. If I believe in karma and think high emotions can leave traces on material (Record player theory), what is to say that the consciousness experiencing them isn't reliving those moments over and over as a form of Hell? People have PTSD and their consciousness is dragged back to their abuse completely removing them from reality in some cases. If consciousness lives beyond the body as a recording, it would create a form of eventual torture where your mind is trapped in those bad moments forever.

I don't believe this myself. It's a mixture of different paranormal investigation theories added to a belief in karma as a natural law. There are people out there who do believe in very similar things and there's no way to prove or disprove it until we better understand consciousness and the brain.
You don't seem to quite understand my point. Hell is a punishment IN THE AFTERLIFE due to breaking godly laws. Karma is our actions coming back to us either in our current life, or if you pursue a certain sect of Buddhism and Hinduism then your karmic balance is demonstrated when you reincarnate. Neither of which affects the afterlife.

I am not discounting anything, what I am saying is that atheist's logically don't believe in hell because they don't believe in a god who created the rules to get into hell.
 
You don't seem to quite understand my point. Hell is a punishment IN THE AFTERLIFE due to breaking godly laws. Karma is our actions coming back to us either in our current life, or if you pursue a certain sect of Buddhism and Hinduism then your karmic balance is demonstrated when you reincarnate. Neither of which affects the afterlife.

I am not discounting anything, what I am saying is that atheist's logically don't believe in hell because they don't believe in a god who created the rules to get into hell.
Did you miss my point entirely? God doesn't need to exist for an after life of some form to exist. My example was a portion of your "soul" (consciousness) gets wrote onto a brick which then forces it to re-enact the worst moment of your life over and over. That would be considered a form of Hell and fits within some current atheist paranormal investigator's theories. It's outside of religion entirely unless you consider a belief in ghosts existing to be religious.
 
I used to be an edgy atheist because I had bad experiences with Christians. My beliefs have since changed but I don't accept most religious dogma. I can sum it up as:

>A single, all powerful creator set all existence into motion then stepped away (Watchmaker analogy)
>Nature is the language of God
>There is no such thing as a soul or an afterlife
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Great Chandler
I have no bitter feelings towards the religious and was not raised religious. I think the values of most religious are good but I just can't force myself to believe in all of the mysticism. I don't speak for all nonbelievers but I can't be the only one like this.
In terms of the supernatural, some of it may just be that we don't know how it works. For example, angels are not omnipotent, because they are not as powerful as God, hence there must be some kinds of laws of nature they cannot violate. Could the plane they usually inhabit contain fields other than the fields that mediate gravity, electromagnetism, and the weak and strong nuclear forces that could potentially enable miracles? Admittedly, I think they might perform miracles by a different method, but I can't entirely discount that possibility, and hopefully you get my point anyway.
 
The definition of Hell per Christians is actually "a place devoid of God." The fire and brimstone shit doesn't formally come from the bible, so Hell as understood by Christians would actually be impossible to exist for Atheists.

As for like a general concept of punishment after death, I'm sure some have a vague existential fear but I'm not sure I'd classify what they fear as a strict concept like Hell.
 
Pascal's wager is the only objective truth ever written by man, except replace "God" with "basically every sufficiently large religion".

The common theme behind nearly every religion is "be good and you'll be rewarded in some way". I don't necessarily believe in Hinduism or Shinto or any of them really, but I figure there's a non zero chance that one of them got it right, so I might as well do my best to be good and hope that whatever deity weighs my soul against a feather in the afterlife recognizes that.

Worst case scenario I was a good person for no reason.

I think that deep down, even the fedora tippingest atheist recognizes that there's a tiny chance that they're wrong and are sometimes driven to do good because of it. Like I said, there's no downside, so it's the logical thing to do.
 
Pascal's wager is the only objective truth ever written by man, except replace "God" with "basically every sufficiently large religion".

The common theme behind nearly every religion is "be good and you'll be rewarded in some way". I don't necessarily believe in Hinduism or Shinto or any of them really, but I figure there's a non zero chance that one of them got it right, so I might as well do my best to be good and hope that whatever deity weighs my soul against a feather in the afterlife recognizes that.

Worst case scenario I was a good person for no reason.

I think that deep down, even the fedora tippingest atheist recognizes that there's a tiny chance that they're wrong and are sometimes driven to do good because of it. Like I said, there's no downside, so it's the logical thing to do.

The idea of "pascal's wager except it's just about being good instead of believing in a specific faith's god" is actually already covered by Buddhism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebirth_(Buddhism)#Pragmatic_arguments_and_wager_theories
 
This is a VERY American question, but I'll bite; for some people, sure, why not, if an overzealous parent lauds Hell over you like the fucking sword of Damocles, why on earth not?

If it's used as a barrier to be brought down every time the kids attempts self expression via naughtiness then no shit they're gonna freak out once they've left and assume ALL religion is a source of control 'cos of that's how it worked fer me lol'.

In some cases it's a simple game of does-it-work-logically? And the answer is no.

In other cases there is no fear after death more of a fear of hell on earth that we create.

In, yet more, cases there's an understanding that there's likely something within these texts that speak to human society and nature (old knowledge) passed on through the most effective means; storytelling.

I would say there's no mystery in atheists and a lot more in the religious; why believe in God and an afterlife without a speck of hard evidence?

There's clearly a human desire and need for some kind of spiritual guidance or we wouldn't see the rise of the mystical gender beliefs or other cult bullshit, but where does that come from? Why is it so necessary?
 
There is no motive behind disbelief. Either you believe or you don't. I actually wish I was religious. It would give me something to lean on during shitty times. Unfortunately, I can't force my mind to believe that there's a giant bearded man in the sky watching while I masturbate.
It's possible to forge your own larger-than-life beliefs instead of just incorporating an existing one. Just don't turn it into a cult.
 
Last edited:
I am afraid of the process of dying but I am not afraid of death if that makes sense. Once I'm gone I'm gone, as for the morality side of things I try not to do bad things because I'm not a prick who wasn't brought up properly.
 
Back