A virus, not a fucking protein, dumbass.
A foreign pseudo-living pathogen from a hijacked cell - not a single proteins.
A very specific, complex protein, the very same protein that your immune system is trained to recognize when you get an infusion of inactivated viruses or when you get infected by that virus itself. A protein that otherwise does not exist inside your body.
Whether those spikes are attached to an inactivated virus or floating somewhat freely is of no consequence to your immune system. It identifies that protein in your system based on its surface and gets rid of them.
Just for shits n giggles: are you aware that inactive viruses in subunit vaccines are usually also damaged and incomplete, if not outright broken to bits? They are actually safer than vaccines derived of complete inactivated viruses, cause anything that isn't causing an immune reaction (but could cause negative side effects) is filtered out.
If that also extends to mRNA vaccines, they are also considerably safer than vaccines using inactivated viruses.
There is more to a virus than just the spike protein.
Which is why I differentiated between the two in my post, yes. As for your immune system identifying the virus, it does so by analyzing its surface, which is covered in those spike-proteins. In terms of the following response, anything else about the virus' internal composition is irrelevant, which is why that distinction is pointless in this case. Your immune system can't look inside the virus, it decides what to do based on the surface structure.
I already know how Simple RNA viruses work.
This is irrelevant to my point.
Then why does your orginal statement make you look like you didn't know anything about the most basic virus reproduction cycle?
You said this:
"From the act of
teaching your body to destroy something made by your own body [...] but to act like priming your T-cells to murk cells affected by
proteins created by your own body and B-cells to start shooting out antibodies at stuff also produced from your own cells has no potential risk for long-term complications [...]"
This sounds like you were entirely unaware that viruses reproduce by hijacking a cell to make it produce more viruses. Your entire point is that it's dangerous to make the body combat something made by itself, when it is doing just that whenever you get infected by a virus anyway.
I guess you want to insinuate that the spike-proteins could start attaching themselves to regular cells and make them read as viruses to your immune system? I can only assume this being a point you attempt to make, cause you don't bother spelling out whatever it is you want to say. So in case I am spot on here: What do you base that on? Subunit Vaccines have been around for decades and that isn't a concern with them. Why is it a concern now all of a sudden?
And let's not forget, this whole point is about long term effects in the first place:
Even if that was a possibility (which is a dubious assumption at best), there still remains that tiny little problem that this would be a very immediate, short term side effect, not a long term effect by any stretch of the word. If this was an actual issue, after several BILLIONS of mRNA vaccines being handed out, it would already have taken effect.
Sounds to me you're unfamiliar with how vaccines work, how viruses work and you're just doing vague ominous doomposting without actually bothering to go into detail what it even is you assume, fear or expect to happen.
It actually does work differently
How so? You seem fond of just typing out meaningless platitudes like "there is more to a virus than a spike protein" and now this?
Do you have anything to elaborate, cause this statement is entirely devoid of meaning otherwise.
It works differently. Fine then. How? Why is this important and how does it affect anything?
No it doesn't randomly attack cells afterwards* (*that we know of yet), it only attacks the ones with the surface proteins.
Yes. Why is this a problem? The only thing covered in those proteins is the Corona virus. That cute little "that we know of yet" is one more platitude devoid of actual meaning. Elaborate that point or don't even bother bringing it up.
It's like you refuse to make a point or elaborate on it, really. Doomposting without actual content.
Frankly, the more I read up on how regular, decades-in-use vaccines work and all the crazy shit to make them do their job like using yeast or bacteria vectors, the more I get the feeling that mRNA vaccines are not that special. It's fascinating that humans managed to assemble those mRNA strains (or rather make something that assembles them), but given that there's just some really outlandish shit out there that people have been jabbed with for longer than anyone on the farms has been alive helps making these new types a whole lot less mystifying.
Should I be aware of what that is?