MarvinTheParanoidAndroid
This will all end in tears, I just know it.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2015
No he isn't, because unlike you, I actually watched his interview and he has legitimate concerns about long term health risks caused by this vaccine. You are just another uneducated, gullible, autistic Democrat though so of course you're buying into a journalist's interpretation of that interview instead of watching it for yourself.Except he is only tardraging about the mRNA vaccine because, in his own words, they aren't giving him money for his "inventing" it. You are just another uneducated, gullible, autistic Republican though so of course you're buying the conspiracy theory.
Again, I know you're profoundly delusional and accept everything served to you by the news media complex, but hospitals have a financial incentive to overreport Covid deaths so the numbers are all fudged & unreliable.Again, I know you are proudly uneducated and inept at math, but the number of people who died from covid is way higher than 4100. Again, I know you admit to being uneducated and hating people who are educated, but 4100 is a lot fewer than 800,000. Even someone as retarded as you should know that.
Come on, you claim the vaccine is super duper deadly. Where are these tens of millions dead? If you can't produce this, you're admitting I am right and you're wrong, as per usual
And you refuse to believe what a scientist tells you because your deluded diseased brain will only believe what a dementia ridden pedophile who you want to have sex with told you.It's cute when you steal my insults because your diseased, simpleton brain can't come up with your own. You are seriously a gullible retard. You believe everything one of your fellow GOPers posts on Twitter and Reddit, but you don't believe anything the media tells you to because the obese, elderly conman who you want to have sex with told you not to.
Pot, meet kettle.Awww, again you're stealing my insults. It's cute that you show all the signs of autism but you call others autistic.
LMAO libel laws are stringent and only apply in the strictest circumstances where the lie can be proven to have caused harm to the person spoken about.And again, I know having a diseased brain you can't understand context, but someone who is a true journalist and not just posting under an anonymous username is under scrutiny for libel laws and other repercussions.
Every last one of your posts is an autistic gotcha, so the shoe fits.Lol it's cute when your uneducated, simpleton ass tries to do autistic gotchas.
1. You think in a rigid pattern of repetition where you just regurgitate the same insults over & over.1. You can't understand percentages. Anything that isn't 100% is automatically 0%. That is a telltale sign of autism.
2. You can't handle context. You legit think "Appeal to authority" between science and legal authority is the same. I don't know if that's a sign of autism or just being very low IQ, but you obviously have both
2. You grossly misunderstand what anyone says to you & pretend it's something it's not.
3. This whole "100% or 0%" rhetoric is just an autistic talking point in and of itself you invented as a strawman to argue against because you can't comprehend what's actually being said to you.
Wait, if I believe everything I read on the internet then why am I unwilling to listen to journalists who are all over the Internet? That assertion doesn't make any sense.3. You automatically believe everything you read on the internet. Being very impressionable and gullible is a telltale sign of autism.
I read this whole thing and at no point do they link to any sources for their claims, this shit could be fabricated whole cloth for all you knew and you wouldn't second guess it because you accept the news blindly regardless of how it's presented or where it comes from because you're an overtly trusting autist who questions nothing presented to you by the anchor man on the boomer tube.Again, I realize you have crippling autism, which is why you live on disability and are very impressionable, but Rogan likely wouldn't shut up so the doc prescribed him ivermectin just to shut him up. The studies that showed it worked used literally falsified data. Do you want me to give you a source? It's not from 4chan or a random post on reddit, so you might not believe it, but it's from the bbc: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58170809
And yet when it's a scientist that's saying something you disagree with you're suddenly anti-science and confer to the authority of journalists to prove a scientist wrong because in your rigid autistic thinking you can't accept it because it defies what you're diseased brain already accepted to be true & thus can't break away from that preprogrammed truth. When a doctor prescribes ivermectin to a patient, that doctor suddenly becomes a quack because daddy journalist says it couldn't be what worked despite failing to cite sources to studies he claims really happened, but when Joe Rogan threatened libel suits daddy journalist clammed up.You're the one saying 99% of doctors and scientists are wrong and that you know more than they do, despite you being uneducated and hating education.
This is fucking rich coming from you, believing everything a journalist has to tell you over what a scientist says because the journalist says what you want to hear and not the scientist.Look, I know you're embarrassed about being an uneducated, low-IQ simpleton who falls for every grifter there is, but you should be more skeptical.