I just read the article and it just gives the usual "trust the science" line after emphasizing the problem I mentioned of "everyone needs to be vaccinated or we'll never get back to normal!"
The article overall isn't about this subject, sadly. It's mostly about vaccinations in general and the fears parents have of their long term effects on their children. No one rational is saying vaccines are universally to be avoided so I'm there with the guy on that one, but further study and investigation into vaccines and their application at certain ages or other factors, especially new vaccines and stuff like the Covid experimental vaccines, or their correlation to certain problems (the autism argument in the article gave me a chuckle) is also rational. It's odd to me that people would encourage one or the other rather than both.
It's also retarded to just say "Hey, I guess they don't trust the science" when that's the argument companies and BigPharma has been using since their dawn. Anyone remember the massive damage caused by over-medicating kids in the early 90's? Or the rise of the practice of popping pills into teens' mouths if they seem depressed constantly or younger kids if they're especially hyper? "Trust the science" and "Trust the doctor, they know better" really helped a lot there. Same with the opioid crisis.
Being circumspect is all I'm after. Prudence rather than blind faith. The latter is what makes anti-vax and uber-vax both intellectually deranged.
Who would they be, these doctors who aren't the "quacks" I and others have mentioned? Also if you work in the vaccine development field then why not speak on your own expertise rather than just saying you trust your peers? Do you know the science or do you not?
Majority vote means nothing so stop trying to flaunt that, especially when doctors can lose their jobs or even licenses if they don't toe the line in many aspects. You know this. Everyone knows this.
I even twice posted
this video which incidentally proves this.
"Couple of quacks" is how you smear the names listed by me and other posters, chief of medicine and otherwise. Thankfully people can look back at both of our post history ITT and see what "quacks" you mention.
You just keep avoiding the issue and crossing your fingers at me while calling me anti-vax thinking I'll burst into flame.