Are you getting the vaccine? - Absolute trashfire thread, please enter with caution

This is what the proliferation of these narratives has done. I'm not usually a fascist but there needs to be a solution for this, like shipping them off to anti vax land where they can create new ebola aids and all kill each other without making the rest of us suffer.
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities
 
Because viruses apparently get more deadly with time.
You say retarded shit like this, yet I'm supposedly the science denier.
That's sort of the opposite of what happens. They get more virulent with time, because being able to spread is evolutionarily preferred. That means they spread more. However, the more deadly they get, the less chance they get to spread, especially in the human sphere where once a virus gets scary enough, we take active measures to attack it.

Evolution of a virus can be scary fast, because while actually living things like humans have generations decades long, a generation of a virus is alarmingly fast. For instance, it's under two days for HIV. The more instances of a virus that are out there, the more opportunities to mutate. When a new, more virulent strain, or more deadly, or both arrives, it can rapidly become the most dominant strain.

Anti-vaxers are basically bug factories, brainless idiots full of memes, who often base their idiocy on the babblings of a deranged orange skinned con man they worship.
It actually isn’t approved by the FDA. None of the vaccines are. It was approved for emergency use. That’s a huge difference.
It isn't fully approved. That doesn't mean it isn't provisionally approved. Why do you quote shit that doesn't prove what you say?
 
I'm waiting to see what the longish-term (6 months to a year) effects of the experimental vaccines are on the general population first. I'm not in the danger-range for people susceptible to the worst of COVID effects to begin with so I don't really feel it's necessary to pump a completely novel vaccine with no long-term studies into my body until I can be reasonably certain the cure isn't going to end up being worse than the disease. No, I am not an anti-vaxxer, I have received essentially all the other common vaccines, but this is just too new and too hyped by a media and world-government with a proven track-record of fucking with people for me to down the Kool-Aid quite yet.
 
It would be so much easier to just suspend the constitution because of Covid 19 and economy. No point in deep state illuminati shit when you can turn the government into a dictatorship at any time if you really wanted to.

More compliant citizens when you slowly increase your control. Maybe if there werent so many guns in circulation you'd have a point. Of course it's all speculation.

My voice has started to randomly give out for minutes at a time, and I feel kind of stressed out even though I have no reason to be. Maybe getting the vaccine was a mistake.

Thoughts and prayers!
 
My voice has started to randomly give out for minutes at a time, and I feel kind of stressed out even though I have no reason to be. Maybe getting the vaccine was a mistake.
Maybe this was a tiny bit preemptive?

sig.PNG
 
Actually believing anything @SIGSEGV says. Are you people retarded? Never mind. I already know.
does that mean he was lying when he said it felt great, he was lying now, or he was lying about getting it

in any case if he can't tank the side effects he is a pussy and should post his boypussy
 
realize that the world is nearly impossible to be controlled by one group.
I have been saying this exact thing the entire thread. Lurk more.

How they rationalize it? Simple:
View attachment 2144891
They blindly trust anyone with the Doctor title. Anyone who dares be skeptical is a tinfoil hat wearing anti-vaxxer.

As I said earlier in the thread Pfizer killed a bunch of kids with some experimnetal antibiotic, the whole affair was shady as fuck. But I'm sure they've changed their ways and go the extra step to ensure your safety.
And again, I'm not saying they chip you (lol), or intentionally poison you. They just care about money, and only money.
WOW! I'm not an capslock fag but just...wow. This is genuinely nuts and the fact that they settled out of court for 50 million says a lot.
The US-based company sent a team of its doctors into the Nigerian slum city of Kano in the midst of an appaling meningitis epidemic to perform what it calls a "humanitarian mission". However the accusers claim it was an unlicensed medical trial on critically-ill children.

A team of Pfizer doctors reached the Nigerian camp just as the outbreak, which killed at least 11,000 people, was peaking. They set themselves up within metres of a medical station run by the aid group Médecins Sans Frontières, which was dispensing proven treatments to ease the epidemic.

From the crowd that had gathered at the Kano Infectious Diseases Hospital, 200 sick children were picked. Half were given doses of the experimental Pfizer drug called Trovan and the others were treated with a proven antibiotic from a rival company.


Eleven of the children died and many more, it is alleged, later suffered serious side-effects ranging from organ failure to brain damage. But with meningitis, cholera and measles still raging and crowds still queueing at the fence of the camp, the Pfizer team packed up after two weeks and left.

@AnOminous thoughts? Or are you going to let your eyes glass over and pretend this doesn't exist too, despite giving it the "Dumb" sticky, proving you did read it but you just don't want to address it like with so much of what I and others had posted?
 
I have been saying this exact thing the entire thread. Lurk more.


WOW! I'm not an capslock fag but just...wow. This is genuinely nuts and the fact that they settled out of court for 50 million says a lot.


@AnOminous thoughts? Or are you going to let your eyes glass over and pretend this doesn't exist too, despite giving it the "Dumb" sticky, proving you did read it but you just don't want to address it like with so much of what I and others had posted?
When did I say pharma companies aren't evil ghouls who would gladly use dying African orphans as guinea pigs? Or that they care about us at all? Of course they'd do shit like that in countries where there aren't functioning legal systems where they'd be eviscerated if they harmed significant numbers of people.
 
Of course they'd do shit like that in countries where there aren't functioning legal systems where they'd be eviscerated if they harmed significant numbers of people.
Vaccine developers have been indemnified for a long time in the USA and most civilized countries and especially with the Covid vaccines. Look it up (or just watch the six minute video I posted, linked and mentioned to you repeatedly--you have enough attention span for six minutes of experts and even vax company CEO talking about this right?)
Edit: I did it for you with a single search:
1.png


And stop side-stepping the point. Concern about or against the Covid mRNA vax is valid and not just anti-vax rambling or Illuminati tinfoil hat wearing scare mongering. You have not once conceded this point and keep pretending the only people concerned about the vax and the background information regarding it (including the companies),

So either accept it or keep being known as a double-talking retard who, for whatever reason, distrusts BigPharma but wholly trusts the mRNA vaccine, which we know less about than the virus it's meant to protect against--a virus which is no longer remotely the threat to broad populace it once was due to us researching and finally understanding it.
 
Last edited:
Vaccine developers have been indemnified for a long time in the USA and most civilized countries and especially with the Covid vaccines. Look it up (or just watch the six minute video I posted, linked and mentioned to you repeatedly--you have enough attention span for six minutes of experts and even vax company CEO talking about this right?)
I'm well aware of that, you retard. They're not completely indemnified, but the claims process for damages from vaccines are administrative and not judicial, and when judicial remedies are available, they are limited to the Court of Federal Claims, and good luck. Even things like asbestos have been reduced to administrative processes like this, because the sheer volume of claims would otherwise swamp the courts.

Do you realize nobody would even bother to make even absolutely necessary vaccines if they were going to be subjected to every ambulance chaser in the country every time someone got an ouchie?
 
I'm well aware of that, you retard.
Then why did you say something as retarded as this, big brain?
Of course they'd do shit like that in countries where there aren't functioning legal systems where they'd be eviscerated if they harmed significant numbers of people.
Did you think inserting the caveat "significant numbers" made a difference? It doesn't. Though let's be honest, you were more focused on avoiding the point of people's concern being valid rather than paying attention to what you were typing.

Do you realize nobody would even bother to make even absolutely necessary vaccines if they were going to be subjected to every ambulance chaser in the country every time someone got an ouchie?
Good point. Now if only there wasn't literally tens of billions of dollars annually in potential profit to make for these shady, corrupt and indemnified Pharma companies by peddling like flu vaccines these experimental mRNA vaccines which were rush-developed in the shortest time span in human history (for a vax) and have no rigorous or long-term study given to them (and which were already being pumped out before they even put their preliminary study up for peer review)...maybe then we could lay to rest any concern anyone would have about them and their products--which are being pushed to make everyone get vaccinated, even those who recovered illness.

But since we live in such a reality, the concerns are entirely valid and anyone who says they aren't, or that those concerned are just anti-vaxxers, is either an uber-vaxxer worshiper or a disingenuous retard.
Again, don't worry, I know you aren't suckling at BigPharma and blindly trusting as Gospel any vaccine they produce. I know you are not an uber-vaxxer.
 
Did you think inserting the caveat "significant numbers" made a difference? It doesn't. Though let's be honest, you were more focused on avoiding the point of people's concern being valid rather than paying attention to what you were typing.
This doesn't even make sense. Yes, "significant numbers" is important in anything where you're delivering something to literally hundreds of millions of people. Are you pretending to be retarded or are you actually retarded?
 
This doesn't even make sense. Yes, "significant numbers" is important in anything where you're delivering something to literally hundreds of millions of people. Are you pretending to be retarded or are you actually retarded?
Are you? What quantifies "significant numbers" and where is that to be found in the PREP Act? Hey, I could be wrong. Show me where the legislature specifically says anything remotely akin to
"These companies are indemnified from damages unless a significant number of patients (herein "significant number" is "more than X claimants") report and are proven to have suffered severe effects from the company's product."

I've been wrong before. I can take a hit. So show me, because from the reports I've read the only qualifier of whether a company is protected or not is "unintentionally", and since no one but actual tinfoil hatters believes these companies are intentionally trying to sicken or kill people with their products, that doesn't factor in here.
 
Back