Argue about Romania while pretending it's about Andrew Tate

SpergioLeonne

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Feb 7, 2022
Romania is not Slavic
Close e-fucking-nough. Their language is degenerative Latin-esque with heavy Greco-Slavic features. The accent is Slavic. Poland and Hungary also use a modified Latin alphabet instead of the one St. Cyril made from Greek for the East Slavs. Like Romania, Poland is mostly Catholic rather than Orthodox.

Most of Romania was part Hungary or the Austro-Hungarian Empire, or the Polish-Hungarian Commonwealth.
 
Close e-fucking-nough. Their language is degenerative Latin-esque with heavy Greco-Slavic features. The accent is Slavic. Poland and Hungary also use a modified Latin alphabet instead of the one St. Cyril made from Greek for the East Slavs. Like Romania, Poland is mostly Catholic rather than Orthodox.

Most of Romania was part Hungary or the Austro-Hungarian Empire, or the Polish-Hungarian Commonwealth.
Only Transylvania was part of various incarnations of Hungary and its people were as happy to be ruled by Hungarians as the Ukrainians are with Russia, and ejected the foreigners as soon as it was viable, AND made a military excursion to Budapest, you know, to make sure things are chill and the Danube flows cozily.
The accent is not Slavic in any way, it's a Romance language.
Romania is like 89% Orthodox, not Catholic.
Poland only had influence over parts of Moldova, and not often, as Russia was in competition for the same parts. Hungary tried to expand in the area too, unsuccessfuly.
The main invader were the Ottomans though. Hungarians largely rules as nobles and kept the local population poor and destitute.
Each of the invaders paid a significant price for their meddling and messing around an area which is not theirs, so all is good, I guess.
"Greco-Slavic" lmao. Stop making shit up?
 
Only Transylvania was part of various incarnations of Hungary and its people were as happy to be ruled by Hungarians as the Ukrainians are with Russia, and ejected the foreigners as soon as it was viable, AND made a military excursion to Budapest, you know, to make sure things are chill and the Danube flows cozily.
The accent is not Slavic in any way, it's a Romance language.
Romania is like 89% Orthodox, not Catholic.
Poland only had influence over parts of Moldova, and not often, as Russia was in competition for the same parts. Hungary tried to expand in the area too, unsuccessfuly.
The main invader were the Ottomans though. Hungarians largely rules as nobles and kept the local population poor and destitute.
Each of the invaders paid a significant price for their meddling and messing around an area which is not theirs, so all is good, I guess.
"Greco-Slavic" lmao. Stop making shit up?
Help me bro, I can’t find Romania on any of these old maps.

Ok, one SAYS Romania, but look at where the Carpathians are

Also, edit to add I was wrong and they are actually mostly orthodox. Slavs confirmed, though
 

Attachments

  • F3CA447A-6131-43EB-A41E-EF3A40BFE8D2.jpeg
    F3CA447A-6131-43EB-A41E-EF3A40BFE8D2.jpeg
    48.2 KB · Views: 18
  • 91B46A9D-CACC-4669-A993-E75314EAEC46.png
    91B46A9D-CACC-4669-A993-E75314EAEC46.png
    195.8 KB · Views: 18
  • 87A8B277-229E-46B8-902E-FC72AD9211D4.png
    87A8B277-229E-46B8-902E-FC72AD9211D4.png
    1.8 MB · Views: 22
Last edited:
Help me bro, I can’t find Romania on any of these old maps.

Ok, one SAYS Romania, but look at where the Carpathians are

Also, edit to add I was wrong and they are actually mostly orthodox. Slavs confirmed, though
Do you know what ethnogenesis is? One of your maps literally cuts Wallachia out. What you're doing is randomly deconstruction an identity that has formed over centuries, many of them under the occupation of some empire. You think Vlad Tepes or Michael the Brave were not of the Romanian ethnicity just because at times their lands were ruled by foreign invaders?
Their court documents are still available to read, and any current day Romanian will understand the ones that are written in old Romanian (some are in Slavonic, some in Latin, some in German etc.) with minimal effort.
The nation itself is only a continuation of the ethnos, and that incorporates too many things to bother with for a topic about some Anglomutt degenerate, like culture, genetic heritage, religion, education and more.
Resisting the centuries of imperial occupation and its vicissitudes and emerging with a pretty intact ethnic, tribal identity is far more heroic than being a multicultural amorphous empire that only plunders from its subjects.
 
Do you know what ethnogenesis is? One of your maps literally cuts Wallachia out. What you're doing is randomly deconstruction an identity that has formed over centuries, many of them under the occupation of some empire. You think Vlad Tepes or Michael the Brave were not of the Romanian ethnicity just because at times their lands were ruled by foreign invaders?
Their court documents are still available to read, and any current day Romanian will understand the ones that are written in old Romanian (some are in Slavonic, some in Latin, some in German etc.) with minimal effort.
The nation itself is only a continuation of the ethnos, and that incorporates too many things to bother with for a topic about some Anglomutt degenerate, like culture, genetic heritage, religion, education and more.
Resisting the centuries of imperial occupation and its vicissitudes and emerging with a pretty intact ethnic, tribal identity is far more heroic than being a multicultural amorphous empire that only plunders from its subjects.
The term “Romania” didn’t exist before the 1860’s, so yeah.
 
Close e-fucking-nough. Their language is degenerative Latin-esque with heavy Greco-Slavic features. The accent is Slavic. Poland and Hungary also use a modified Latin alphabet instead of the one St. Cyril made from Greek for the East Slavs. Like Romania, Poland is mostly Catholic rather than Orthodox.

Most of Romania was part Hungary or the Austro-Hungarian Empire, or the Polish-Hungarian Commonwealth.

No, not close e-fucking-nough. We live in an age of information, but that doesn't give you a free pass to hash together the first 2-3 results of your Google search. Put some fucking effort into your posts, you illiterate pseudo-historian.

A Latin base with Greco-Slavic vocabulary is still a Latin language. By your logic, English would be a Latin language by sheer virtue of its Germanic roots being eclipsed by heavy integration of French loanwords and partial adoption of Latin grammar.

I don't mean to veer off-topic and potentially derail the thread, but holy fucking shit: what in the absolute fuck is up with ill-informed mongoloids puffing their chest out proud and proclaiming blatant lies as the unadulterated truth?

It's not the fact that you're ill-informed, it's the fact that you double down on remaining ill-informed that burns my ass.
 
I suspect like you they were fed a false narrative about the Eastern side of Euroshite. Yeah, its a fucking dump, how any faggot falls for this is beyond me. Just search up those places, human trafficing is rife. Oh, and the reason rich muslims and North Africans have a solid supply of white flesh to rape is down to these nations as well. More often than not, when these sex slaves are freed, they are almost always from the East.

When they crave white flesh to defile, they love the Western Euro, kidnapped women and girls stolen from the ever shit care industry at what they want. They want them because Eastern girls sold into that shit are kinda played out, too easy to get.

I will happily take the danger hairs and cunty women over slavery. These people enslave their own, fucking scum.
Machiavellianism and brutality are Lindy, so Deadlift Man informs me. Especially in Eastern Europe.
 
No, not close e-fucking-nough. We live in an age of information, but that doesn't give you a free pass to hash together the first 2-3 results of your Google search. Put some fucking effort into your posts, you illiterate pseudo-historian.

A Latin base with Greco-Slavic vocabulary is still a Latin language. By your logic, English would be a Latin language by sheer virtue of its Germanic roots being eclipsed by heavy integration of French loanwords and partial adoption of Latin grammar.

I don't mean to veer off-topic and potentially derail the thread, but holy fucking shit: what in the absolute fuck is up with ill-informed mongoloids puffing their chest out proud and proclaiming blatant lies as the unadulterated truth?

It's not the fact that you're ill-informed, it's the fact that you double down on remaining ill-informed that burns my ass.
Romania didn’t exist until the 1860s. So is it really the Wallachian language we’re talking about?
 

Attachments

  • 984C32F3-1EA3-4883-AE17-724C3762ED82.jpeg
    984C32F3-1EA3-4883-AE17-724C3762ED82.jpeg
    147.3 KB · Views: 17
Back