🌟 Internet Famous Arin Hanson / Egoraptor / Grump - "Hey I'm Grump!" of Game Grumps fame, hypocritical SJW doxer, shat himself recording a let's play

  • Thread starter Thread starter LN 910
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Dipodomys said:
Incoming from reddit
View attachment 2038181
As yet unverified, but she's answering questions easily. This should get a few diehard lovelies worked up, even if most of the drama has died down.
Early archive, just in case.
Click to expand...
The only thing that's peaked my interest in that is the idea of Suzy having an actual taxidermy art show. Wasn't she horrible at taxidermy? Or what was the deal with that?
 
If Arin were to start streaming on chaturbate you reckon he'd do an ass poor job at dildo blasting his man tunnels combined witn ramblings on it being his own unique experienceand comparing his grumpussy to burnt toast?
 
Dipodomys said:
Incoming from reddit
View attachment 2038181
As yet unverified, but she's answering questions easily. This should get a few diehard lovelies worked up, even if most of the drama has died down.
Early archive, just in case.
Click to expand...
She did have an art show at a beauty salon
Seems like Suzy is friends with the owner?
Screenshot_20210329-131452.png
Screenshot_20210329-132201.png Screenshot_20210329-132050.png
 
Last edited:
Dipodomys said:
Incoming from reddit
View attachment 2038181
As yet unverified, but she's answering questions easily. This should get a few diehard lovelies worked up, even if most of the drama has died down.
Early archive, just in case.
Click to expand...
As much as i like to see the facade of Dan's "wholesomness" tumble down as any decent Kiwifarmer it irks me that she used the term "victim". How about "i got fooled" or something?
 
Being a victim is empowering now, didn't get the memo?

She puts it so softly when her own decision-making is involved ("consensual experience") right before she decides to use the word victim. Wokeism is so bipolar about sex, it's either meaningless or the most important thing ever depending on which paragraph you're on.
 
deeman said:
As much as i like to see the facade of Dan's "wholesomness" tumble down as any decent Kiwifarmer it irks me that she used the term "victim". How about "i got fooled" or something?
Click to expand...
Someone asked for clarification on that.
stupidshit.png
Saying she fell victim to Dan's behavior just meant she took the bait and got scammed. Probably wanted to make her essay sound better, wording it like that.
 
Dipodomys said:
Incoming from reddit
View attachment 2038181
As yet unverified, but she's answering questions easily. This should get a few diehard lovelies worked up, even if most of the drama has died down.
Early archive, just in case.
Click to expand...
>EDIT 2: I have sent text message screenshots to the mods for verification purposes.
She needs to actually post the proof about how he was promising a relationship. I don't get why Redditors will "send proof" to the mods, then the jannies come and say "verified" and then we don't get to see any of it for ourselves. If Dan is promising relationships, saying how much he wants to be with you, etc, they should post that for everyone to see so there can be some actual proof of it that can't be easily dismissed by these people. But attentionwhoring for a few moments is more important to them than actually posting anything that might change the opinion on "uwu soft smol cinnamon roll Dan" to Game Grumps fans.
 
Chris Chad said:
If Dan is promising relationships, saying how much he wants to be with you, etc, they should post that for everyone to see so there can be some actual proof of it that can't be easily dismissed by these people.
Click to expand...
But it doesn't work, though. Look what happened with the NotBlarg post. The young woman allowed them to share the proof to the subreddit (both video and text messages) and she was still labeled a liar who was trying to ruin Dan's career/life. And hadn't the Lovelies gone out of their way to try to find out who this woman was and doxx her - all because she dared to say Dan wasn't as pure as he made himself out to be? With that kind of reaction from the Lovelies, it's no wonder some of these women would want to limit wh they share their evidence with.

In the end, it doesn't matter if these young women publicly share their evidence or limit who gets to see it - the Dan stans are always going to label them as liars.
 
Last edited:
MahFibro! said:
But it doesn't work, though. Look what happened with the NotBlarg post. The young woman allowed them to share the proof to the subreddit (both video and text messages) and she was still labeled a liar who was trying to ruin Dan's career/life. And hadn't the Lovelies gone out of their way to try to find out who this woman was and doxx her - all because she dared to say Dan wasn't as pure as he made himself out to be? With that kind of reaction from the Lovelies, it's no wonder some of these women would want to limit wh they share their evidence with.

In the end, it doesn't matter if these young women publicly share their evidence or limit who gets to see it - the Dan stans are always going to label them as liars.
Click to expand...
Well, yeah, but that's because they are lying. Or, if we're being extremely generous, exaggerating the truth. I think the first person was more a case of straight up lying by saying they were under age only for it to come out that, while there is a random text message from when they were 17, she didn't sleep with Dan until she was 22.

You don't want to lie about stuff like this because, for a lot of people, if you dismiss a lie, you can dismiss all the other details. I don't like the Grumps, and I think this whole thing is spawned by Dan being a sleazy manchild who has to rely on sleeping with fans because no adult in his age range is going to look at him and think "this is someone I should date."

I'm also curious about some of the grooming details because I think there might be something there. People have mentioned Dan flying them out/spending money, which can sometimes be part of something greater, and it especially seems to be a trend with some other YouTube B-listers who have gotten caught grooming/doing questionable stuff. The problem is, any of that stuff is getting drowned out by made up stuff, or people trying to glorify their consensual groupie activity into victimhood status.

The Lovelies are tards, no question about that. Problem is, all the "victims" come from that pool of tards. I want to believe there is some kind of smoking gun out there, but if it exists, nobody has come forward with it, and the people playing pretend are only making it harder to find. IMO, this is more or less a repeat of the ProJared situation. Jared was doing some pretty cringe stuff with his fans, but nothing illegal. Dan is being a sleazy e-celeb, but, based on what people are saying, it was all consensual/legal.
 
Cyber Bowling said:
Well, yeah, but that's because they are lying. Or, if we're being extremely generous, exaggerating the truth. I think the first person was more a case of straight up lying by saying they were under age only for it to come out that, while there is a random text message from when they were 17, she didn't sleep with Dan until she was 22.

You don't want to lie about stuff like this because, for a lot of people, if you dismiss a lie, you can dismiss all the other details. I don't like the Grumps, and I think this whole thing is spawned by Dan being a sleazy manchild who has to rely on sleeping with fans because no adult in his age range is going to look at him and think "this is someone I should date."

I'm also curious about some of the grooming details because I think there might be something there. People have mentioned Dan flying them out/spending money, which can sometimes be part of something greater, and it especially seems to be a trend with some other YouTube B-listers who have gotten caught grooming/doing questionable stuff. The problem is, any of that stuff is getting drowned out by made up stuff, or people trying to glorify their consensual groupie activity into victimhood status.

The Lovelies are tards, no question about that. Problem is, all the "victims" come from that pool of tards. I want to believe there is some kind of smoking gun out there, but if it exists, nobody has come forward with it, and the people playing pretend are only making it harder to find. IMO, this is more or less a repeat of the ProJared situation. Jared was doing some pretty cringe stuff with his fans, but nothing illegal. Dan is being a sleazy e-celeb, but, based on what people are saying, it was all consensual/legal.
Click to expand...

I can agree with pretty much everything you said; however, when it comes to that young woman lying - if I understand the details correctly - she never claimed Dan made the moves on her when she was a minor. That part started when someone from Twitter misread the post and assumed it implied that's what happened (that person then backpedaled on their claims after taking a closer look at that reddit post and realized how badly they screwed up).
 
Cyber Bowling said:
Well, yeah, but that's because they are lying. Or, if we're being extremely generous, exaggerating the truth. I think the first person was more a case of straight up lying by saying they were under age only for it to come out that, while there is a random text message from when they were 17, she didn't sleep with Dan until she was 22.

You don't want to lie about stuff like this because, for a lot of people, if you dismiss a lie, you can dismiss all the other details. I don't like the Grumps, and I think this whole thing is spawned by Dan being a sleazy manchild who has to rely on sleeping with fans because no adult in his age range is going to look at him and think "this is someone I should date."

I'm also curious about some of the grooming details because I think there might be something there. People have mentioned Dan flying them out/spending money, which can sometimes be part of something greater, and it especially seems to be a trend with some other YouTube B-listers who have gotten caught grooming/doing questionable stuff. The problem is, any of that stuff is getting drowned out by made up stuff, or people trying to glorify their consensual groupie activity into victimhood status.

The Lovelies are tards, no question about that. Problem is, all the "victims" come from that pool of tards. I want to believe there is some kind of smoking gun out there, but if it exists, nobody has come forward with it, and the people playing pretend are only making it harder to find. IMO, this is more or less a repeat of the ProJared situation. Jared was doing some pretty cringe stuff with his fans, but nothing illegal. Dan is being a sleazy e-celeb, but, based on what people are saying, it was all consensual/legal.
Click to expand...
Sorry to self quote, but this needs saying again:
Dipodomys said:
Not what happened here. None of the women, or even the initial post by NotBlarg ever said they were groomed. They did say that they weren't groomed, which was a retarded thing to state at all. When people read the post, they saw "new evidence" "video proof" and "not GROOMING".
Click to expand...
The idea that Dan did anything illegal came from the people who either misread the original post or heard it from someone who did. This is less Dan's personal drama and more of an example of what this fanbase and anti-fanbase is like. How they blow up minor things and normie gossip to the point we find ourselves at now.

People watching Arin and Dan, either through the show or keeping up with gossip, are all waiting for the GG empire to fall. The anti's want to tear it down, and the Lovlies want to prove themselves to their idols by white knighting them. No one watching this show or following these people are neutral. Everyone has an opinion and/or an explanation for the smallest move they make. What happened with Dan was tabloid level shit, and look at what it's turned into.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom