Art professor resigns because of troon student chimp out over criticism - student drew girls with penises and teacher linked it to sexual abuse

A professor at a prestigious art institute has resigned after he said a troop of “militant LGBT students” turned his classroom into something closer to a “police state than a place where academic freedom and the open exchange of ideas is valued.”

Michael Bonesteel has taught at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago as an adjunct for 14 years and is an internationally recognized expert on the 20th-century Chicago artist Henry Darger.

He announced his resignation after three students, in two separate incidents, filed harassment complaints against him for the discussion of sensitive materials in his classes and the way they were presented.

The administration responded by overhauling his curricula and reducing his teaching hours to the point where he would no longer qualify for health insurance, Mr. Bonesteel said in an interview with the Chicago Reader.

The first incident occurred Dec. 12 in a class called “Present and Future of Outsider Art,” when Mr. Bonesteel posited that the prevalence of little girls with penises in Darger’s art might be linked with childhood sexual abuse.

A transgender student took issue with the theory.

“The student said there was no proof that Darger was sexually abused, and therefore I was wrong in proposing the theory,” Mr. Bonesteel told the Chicago Reader, adding that there is no definitive proof, but many Darger scholars think it’s likely.

On the advice of a diversity counselor, Mr. Bonesteel wrote an apology for his “insensitivity” and posted it to a school website, attaching a research article with background on the theory he proposed.

SAIC Dean of Faculty Lisa Wainwright later sided with Mr. Bonesteel in the student’s complaint, but determined he needed sensitivity training on how to talk about “identity-related material” in his curricula.

Mr. Bonesteel said a student launched into a “long diatribe about perceived anti-Semitic attitudes” in the work of an author they were reading, Gerard Jones.

The session turned into a heated debate, and Mr. Bonesteel said the student went on to criticize “SAIC’s policies toward minorities and transgender students specifically, leveling accusations of racism and homophobia toward me in particular.”

The student also complained about the lack of a trigger warning during a discussion about an implied rape in “Batman: The Killing Joke,” a comic book by Alan Moore.

“When I said the word ‘rape,’ the complaining student yelled, ‘Hey, where’s the trigger warning?’ ” Mr. Bonesteelsaid in an interview with Raw Vision. “A little exasperated by that point, since I had already received a long tongue-lashing [from] this student, I remarked, ‘Really? You want a trigger warning for the word “rape”?’ “

In response to a complaint over that incident, the dean of faculty determined “it is more likely than not that your conduct in relation to this student constituted harassment based on gender-identity in violation of the School’s Policy Against Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation.”

Months later, a second student from the comic book class filed a complaint against Mr. Bonesteel on the basis of having been “troubled by the incident.”

The administration later told Mr. Bonesteel that he would no longer be allowed to teach courses on comics or set the curricula for his classes on outsider art, Mr. Bonesteel said. The school also reduced his teaching hours for the next academic year to the point where he would be ineligible for benefits.

Mr. Bonesteel said “to be punished by refusing to let me teach three comics courses in which I had invested twelve years of time and effort and love, and in the process take away my insurance benefits, these were the conditions that I found unacceptable.”

In his June 12 resignation letter, Mr. Bonesteel protested against what he called an “abuse of Title IX protections.”

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jul/21/militant-lgbt-students-force-professors-resignatio/

:cryblood:


Drawings of little girls with dicks are troon rights

Also, sensitivity training on how to talk about “identity-related material” :stress:
 
Living in Prague, there's this goddamn monstrosity right on the Vltava. It's completely out of place, utterly grotesque. I hate it.

1.jpg

The building itself is pretty interesting but i cant help not being annoyed at beautiful european town aesthetic being ruined like that.
Maybe its just me, cuz i like the old school buildings more than any.
 
I always laughed at the notion of conservatives here stating that LGBT people are abomination and degenerates and pedophiles and what not. More and more as of lately, I'm thinking they are right because of fucktards like these. :heart-empty:

It's not the gays that bother us, its the actual degenerates that make a lot of noise about the most insignificant bullshit and actually use policies put into place to protect the weak to harass innocent people. They aren't doing it because they're magnanimous, they do it because they crave the attention and that feeling of power that they've always lacked.

When you start fucking with innocent people's livelihood for your own selfish, twisted intentions, you are a degenerate and a shitty person all around. When you start going after people's kids, or their spouses, and their jobs, I have no use for you.
 
The building itself is pretty interesting but i cant help not being annoyed at beautiful european town aesthetic being ruined like that.
Maybe its just me, cuz i like the old school buildings more than any.
I feel like you can get away with building these types in America because our own old buildings aren't that old and not a huge loss if we tore them down.
 
Jfc if I'm in a building I just want it to not fall down on me or go up in flames like Grenfell. The last thing I want to hear is that the architect wanted it to engage in "dialogue" with its surroundings or some shit.
I like how postmodernists get promptly told to fuck off whenever they try their bullshit with actual STEM fields, so they latch on to stuff that's on the perimeter (Psychology, Architecture) and shit it up instead.
 
It's not the gays that bother us, its the actual degenerates that make a lot of noise about the most insignificant bullshit and actually use policies put into place to protect the weak to harass innocent people. They aren't doing it because they're magnanimous, they do it because they crave the attention and that feeling of power that they've always lacked.

When you start fucking with innocent people's livelihood for your own selfish, twisted intentions, you are a degenerate and a shitty person all around. When you start going after people's kids, or their spouses, and their jobs, I have no use for you.

That's what I was trying to say, I know there's many LGBT people who just want to live and be left alone, but these fuckos are ruining it for everyone and especially them. :(
 
The building itself is pretty interesting but i cant help not being annoyed at beautiful european town aesthetic being ruined like that.
Maybe its just me, cuz i like the old school buildings more than any.
That's my issue with it. The thing is right on the river in the center of the city. It's steps away from the Church where badass Czechoslovak resistance fighters holed up and fought the SS after they assassinated Reinhard Heydrich. One of the things I love so much about this place is the old school architecture, where even the shopping malls have those pastel facades and all that. Then you just turn a corner and like...yuck.
 
I have to admit, I kinda like it. It's so surreal compared to surrounding, its like cartoony 3d bulding version of regular old buildings. However I can understand why people don't like it. It really sticks out like sore thumb.

I have to admit I actually liked it when I just saw a picture of it by itself.

Then I saw it against a horizon, surrounded by everything else. I imagined actually having to look at this piece of shit every day. At that point, I couldn't unsee it as a turd in a punch bowl. Except it just takes one mad shitter to drop that deuce, and people paid millions upon millions to erect this fucking thing.

Of course, the UK doesn't prevent some developer from dropping trou and shitting in the face of humanity like this. Or hordes of mudslimes.

They do, however, protect society from the horror of a baby's parents paying for medical care for it.
 
Gropius was a modernist who believed that function dictates form; his works are mostly boring grey/brown rectangular boxes with square windows. That building looks like some moderate postmodernist work, where curves are incorporated "playfully" using modern materials.
I wonder what your logic is for blaming Bauhaus for abominations like this. It's nothing like anything they did.

Of course, the strict principles of modern design Bauhaus don't apply with the aforementioned buildings, but still follow its main idea to reject heritage. It could be in Dubai or China, and it wouldn't look foreign.

I feel like you can get away with building these types in America because our own old buildings aren't that old and not a huge loss if we tore them down.
Considering how many times European cities were burned to the ground throughout history, most "old" buildings, save for some castles, wall remnants, churches, etc., which are often considerable reconstructions, are the same age as stuff in American cities like Philadelphia, Boston, and Charleston. However, if your general frame of reference for an American city is further inland, then yeah.
 
Of course, the strict principles of modern design Bauhaus don't apply with the aforementioned buildings, but still follow its main idea to reject heritage. It could be in Dubai or China, and it wouldn't look foreign.

That's not even remotely the main idea of Bauhaus, which if anything is actually that form follows function. There is nothing functional in those irrational shapes.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Trilby
^You're talking about Louis Sullivan. Bauhaus was "ornament and crime."

Also, it's sloped to maximize floor space based on the shape of lot and kickbacks given by the council.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: AnOminous
I feel like you can get away with building these types in America because our own old buildings aren't that old and not a huge loss if we tore them down.
I suppose for Americans like me, this just seems normal as opposed to living in somewhere like like in a European city that has been there for centuries or even a milennium. The legacy and historic significances shouldn't be ingnored completely as much as there is some need for modernity as well.
 
Back