- Joined
- Aug 5, 2017
Huh? Chu would not white Knight a woman?
Oh, right, not a tranny, sorry. Press on.
Oh, right, not a tranny, sorry. Press on.
Dramacow Arthur Racian Chu / arthur_affect - From Jeopardy Winner to Angriest Man on Twitter
- Thread starter *Asterisk*
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2018
Accounts like that, which retweet a lot of crazy shit that SJWs/troons post, always get accused of piling on with their followers with absolutely no evidence. But of course, Chu tweeting them and saying how horrible they are - commentary that the Joe Keskold account never adds - is not the same thing at all. Because reasons. Probably the right side of history.
But Twitter is public - and unlike a public conversation, there's a way to make it private from eavesdroppers if you want. Just none of these narcissists want to protect their tweets, because they think what they have to say is too important to just say to their friends.
And people share conversations they've overheard all the time - there's dozens of pages of 'overheard in {x}' out there. It's different if there's photos attached, but I'd want evidence the last woman (whichever one that was) was doxed and harassed. Moreso because it's Ana Mardoll saying it.
People keep on saying they've been harassed online, and it's always, always believed by the usual people. They never go and, y'know, check to see if it's true, or to see if it's real. Anita Sarkeesian's recent incorrect tweet about The Mandalorian got thousands of replies, but when she called it harassment, none of her defenders actually looked to see a bunch of gifs making fun of her attention-seeking and people (earnestly or otherwise) correcting her, they just took her at her word.
I think the world would benefit for a fact-checker but just for people's claims of harassment and death threats. Doubly so when they ask for money at the end of complaining about it.
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2017
Arthur's dream is that of many attention whores: They want to broadcast their every thought everywhere, but demand an expectation of privacy retroactively whenever it suits them.
Twitter is public, Arthur, you greasy, abusive moron. If you don't like what happens when you say stupid shit publicly, then shut the fuck up. Do that anyway.
Twitter is public, Arthur, you greasy, abusive moron. If you don't like what happens when you say stupid shit publicly, then shut the fuck up. Do that anyway.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Pieces of shit like Chu want absolute freedom to talk shit and act like shit in public all they want, dunking on anyone and everyone, canceling people for opinions they don't like, but they don't ever want to be called out and scream bloody murder when their snout is shoved into the giant steaming shit they just took on the floor.
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Ana Mardoll has her own thread.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2014
- Joined
- May 22, 2016
Because of course someone like Arthur would RT stuff from a person who gets triggered by dumb shit like Storify and chili...
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2018
He's blaming terves for Labour (probably) losing the election in the UK. Imagine being so fucking obsessed with trannies that this is the thing you focus on and not brexit policies or the antisemitism allegations. Arthur Chu is 100% a chaser or about to troon out.
Arthur, you are not even British. Sarah Ditum is.
Arthur, you are not even British. Sarah Ditum is.
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2017
Did you see this greasy chink show his sweaty face on David Pakman's show, whiteknighting for Brianna Wu, queen of the troons? You could hear his teeny boner getting hard as he sputtered and sweatted up a frenzy while defending m'lady's honor. Wu is already married to a mongoloid Asian midget, so Arty would be knocking on Johnny's door the minute Frank gets tired of his wendigo wife draining his retirement savings.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Why does this fucking chink think he's relevant?
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
Chu is ignorant on the political ongoings of his own country. Why we would be any less ignorant about the ongoings of a foreign one? Chu and people like him only care about troons and other leftist pandering groups and their undying hatred for everyone who disagrees with them. They know nothing about politics.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2014
Oh fuck off, Chu. No one gives a fuck about troons in this election. It’s not an issue. Just because he obsesses over girldick.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2018
Glinner (who isn't even British) and dipshit TERFs (of which a lot or most appear to be against the Tories) are but a small hate group, but they are apparently also the majority of voters and powerful enough to give BoJo and friends a landslide win in an election where troon politics got little focus in comparison to things like Brexit or Corbyn being Corbachov. Even in a sea of political takes about how Britain is about to turn into the Fourth Reich and whatnot, Chu-chu's manages to stand out as particularly tone deaf.
Doubling down:
Is it really such an unthinkable scenario that not every political issue in the world revolves around feminine penises?
Doubling down:
Is it really such an unthinkable scenario that not every political issue in the world revolves around feminine penises?
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2015
Jesus I watched it and fuck every answer is Zoe Quinn Zoe Quinn Zoe Quinn. Also, why is it that even five years on he can’t make himself look somewhat presentable? He looks like a five year old who threw a tantrum because his mom made him get his haircut.
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2019
With everyone else on the planet talking about Brexit and the economy, only Chu chu train is brave enough to bring it back to the issue that really matters: feminine penis.
If only his mom had made him get a hair wash instead.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2014
It's a mystery. Not even r/Jeopardy wants anything to do with Chu at this point and that's the one place you'd think would be favorable to him.
Mimekiller
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2019
winning Jeopardy should be like turning 21 in LOGANS RUN
- Joined
- May 7, 2017
Wasn't he even in his Jeopardy hayday best known for being the "least likeable candidate"?!