Dramacow Arthur Racian Chu / arthur_affect - From Jeopardy Winner to Angriest Man on Twitter

[Wooper]

Oh so people are going to start blaming QAnon for shaping the public opinions like how the "Russians" did several years ago?

 

[Water-T]

Arthur Chu is defending Cuties, of course he would.

Chu is so determined to defend a film with 11 year old girls humping the floor while dressed like street hookers, just because the director is a POC woman and the majority of people condemning it are on the right.

Some things go way beyond left or right politics - movies sexualizing children is one of those things.

Of course, if Chu was able to see past "hurr durr the right hates it so I must defend it!", he wouldn't have a thread on here.

If a white man had directed that movie, Chu would be screaming to have his nuts cut off and fed to hungry tigers. But since it is a POC woman, it's totally OK!

 

[Jack Awful]

Chu is so determined to defend a film with 11 year old girls humping the floor while dressed like street hookers, just because the director is a POC woman and the majority of people condemning it are on the right.

Some things go way beyond left or right politics - movies sexualizing children is one of those things.

Of course, if Chu was able to see past "hurr durr the right hates it so I must defend it!", he wouldn't have a thread on here.

If a white man had directed that movie, Chu would be screaming to have his nuts cut off and fed to hungry tigers. But since it is a POC woman, it's totally OK!

Whether or not someone defends Cuties is a litmus test for pedophilia and/or sociopathy.

You have to have no morals if you're willing to defend Cuties because right wing people hate it and it has a black female director.

 

[Smithfield Ham]

Chipman, Chu and Linebarger are all defending this pedobait. The best counter argument to their defenses is to just show zoom-ins on all their faces.

 

[From The Uncanny Valley]

Oh so people are going to start blaming QAnon for shaping the public opinions like how the "Russians" did several years ago?

Does the average person even know about QAnon?

 

[Meowthkip]

I don't have any desire to see this movie but it's weird how people are picking sides on it based on political alignment rather than assessing it on whether or not it has any artistic merit and just blindly echoing the points of their chosen side, regardless of whether or not they've seen the damn thing, which I honestly feel like the majority haven't.

IDK, French people are fucking weird, man.

 

[AnOminous]

Post examples.

It's funny how the same people complaining about tits in video games are defending Cuties.

Tits offend them because the girls they're attracted to haven't grown them yet, either because they're children, because they're trannies, or in Arthur Chu's case, probably both.

 

[Doctor Placebo]

I don't have any desire to see this movie but it's weird how people are picking sides on it based on political alignment rather than assessing it on whether or not it has any artistic merit and just blindly echoing the points of their chosen side, regardless of whether or not they've seen the damn thing, which I honestly feel like the majority haven't.

IDK, French people are fucking weird, man.

I read a couple of French people's comments on the film, and the general consensus seemed to be "Our film makers really like to be edgy and push boundaries, but this one went too far."

And while I haven't seen the whole film, some scenes speak for themselves. What I said earlier about a scene of 11 year olds groping each other's asses in skimpy outfits while the camera zoomed in on it, for several minutes while they danced and twerked to a rap song about fucking, isn't hyperbole. That's a scene someone shared in his review video. Some things go beyond what can be excused by additional context.

There have also been quite a few reviewers who have said they tried to give it a fair chance and see if context made it better, and concluded after watching it that no, it didn't.

 

[Meowthkip]

I read a couple of French people's comments on the film, and the general consensus seemed to be "Our film makers really like to be edgy and push boundaries, but this one went too far."

And while I haven't seen the whole film, some scenes speak for themselves. What I said earlier about a scene of 11 year olds groping each other's asses in skimpy outfits while the camera zoomed in on it, for several minutes while they danced and twerked to a rap song about fucking, isn't hyperbole. That's a scene someone shared in his review video. Some things go beyond what can be excused by additional context.

There have also been quite a few reviewers who have said they tried to give it a fair chance and see if context made it better, and concluded after watching it that no, it didn't.

It seems like this movie is going to be regarded like Cannibal Holocaust; an exploitation film that is supposed to be about how exploitation is bad, but nobody actually remembers the anti-exploitation message because, well, the film does the thing it says it's supposed to be against.

The best argument for the movie I've seen from anybody talking about it was that the film is merely a reflection of shit that tween girls are already doing on their own on apps like Tik Tok, which... honestly, yeah, they are, but I think the biggest issue is that with Cuties, there are adults behind the camera and not just other middle schoolers shooting this on their camera phones. I'm very much a person who is in favor of freedom of artistic expression, and I am left to imagine that this film rides the line in order for it to get away with getting distributed by Netflix, but at the same time, it just does not look like a movie I would enjoy watching and I really just do not want to watch it just to be able to argue over whether or not it has the right to exist as a work of art. Either way, this film is getting a ton of exposure, so it's already succeeded.

Also that one really creepy guy defending it is probably going to be held up as the go-to example for anybody who wants this film banned because, Christ, listen to him.

 

[Burd Turglar]

I know a bunch of the clips are old but here's a fresh(ish) cumtown recap for young and old alike on ya boi Arthur.

 

[Meowthkip]

I know a bunch of the clips are old but here's a fresh(ish) cumtown recap for young and old alike on ya boi Arthur.
View attachment 1614914

How the fuck did I not remember a thing like Arthur Chu just having ants, like he's a fucking bunch of cookie crumbs on the ground?

 

[AnOminous]

How the fuck did I not remember a thing like Arthur Chu just having ants, like he's a fucking bunch of cookie crumbs on the ground?

So he has something in common with Ian Chungus.

 

[Burd Turglar]

So he has something in common with Ian Chungus.

You mean other than being a fat, retarded pan face?

 

[Positron]

Chaser Chu cismansplains transmisogyny

This "etymology" of the word bad originated is attributed to one Professor Julius Zupitza and is now rampant on the internet, but according to Medieval linguist Anatoly Liberman, "If I am right, bad is not a back formation on bæddel; on the contrary, bæddel 'a bad man' was formed from it." (It is in his conclusion of a fascinating three-part blog post. Part 1, 2.). Liberman finds that "The history of bad is almost impenetrable", but at least one thing we can all agree: throughout time and space, cross-dressing men are universally agreed to be bad.

Rat crossover with Jonathan "TransEthics" Holliday.

"Cishet dude"? Way to assume someone's gender!

 

[Emperor Julian]

He's wrong about the word Bad but I'm honestly trying to figure how he thinks a society would have a word for deviations from gender norms before it had an ajective for negatives. Then again evil tended to be used like we use bad back then.

but more importantly who is this 'lession' for? his own audience agree with these perspectives so nothing changes. The only people who could plausably learn anything might not even be able to look at it due to block bots.

 

[Positron]

He's wrong about the word Bad but I'm honestly trying to figure how he thinks a society would have a word for deviations from gender norms before it had an ajective for negatives. Then again evil tended to be used like we use bad back then.

Conceivably there could have been a previous word that describe the concept of "bad", only to be superseded and obviated by one derived from "cross-dressing men". We see something like that in the teenage slang "gay" meaning "bad in a generic sense; embarrassing." Of course "gay" did not replace "bad", but if you imagine it did, then you would have something very much like what folk etymology claims about "baedel - bad".

I have no idea what the following is about except Chu-Chu doesn't like married couples doing small talk:

 

[KimCoppolaAficionado]

Conceivably there could have been a previous word that describe the concept of "bad", only to be superseded and obviated by one derived from "cross-dressing men". We see something like that in the teenage slang "gay" meaning "bad in a generic sense; embarrassing." Of course "gay" did not replace "bad", but if you imagine it did, then you would have something very much like what folk etymology claims about "baedel - bad".

I have no idea what the following is about except Chu-Chu doesn't like married couples doing small talk:
View attachment 1738553

Chu resents people who are happy because happiness while there is any amount of suffering anywhere in the world is morally unforgivable. Isn't he the cunt who ranted about being a psychic Jedi meme warrior who mindkills un-PC thoughts before they emerge, or was that Cheong before he realigned himself for the gorrilionth time?

 

[Meowthkip]

Nobody's gonna listen to a dude who just has ants like people have lice.

 

[The Littlest Shitlord]

Nobody is allowed to be happy about anything until Social Justice has triumphed forever and every form of oppression, marginalization, and unfair privilege has been been permanently eliminated. They shouldn't be having fun talking about hobbies they enjoy, they need to be mad talking about trannies and black people and especially black trannies. He has endless ideological rationalizations for this, but the real reason is that Chu is chronically miserable by his own choice and has to drag everyone else down with him.

 

[Emperor Julian]

Nice to see he never clocked the balkanization of gaming culture specifically relates to him and instead goes on an obscure tangent rather than engage in introspection.