Assassin's Creed thread

This is still dumb because Assassin's creed, from the out, relies on bloodlines and lineages. unless you're extremely recent corpses, I'm not believing any Ac protag is gay because most don't have the positions to get away with double-dipping and they have to have descendants for the goddamn plot to work.
As I said, it is still retardation. But now instead of Medieval Black on Asian crime simulator slop, we might now be getting Gay Nigger Crime Simulator.

I'm not saying this is good, but it is funny in a way Ubisoft never intended.
 
For those who might not know, now there are reports that suggest that there might be same sex romance options for both Yasuke & Naoe. This is nothing new, Odyssey was the first AC game with romance options & you could romance both female & male characters.

Ubisoft has unironically put buck-breaking in their game. Naoe at least has fictional character privileges to this retardation.
This entire game conceprually is strange but there's something extremely creepy about allowing players to determine the sexuality of a real person who actually existed.

That's fucking weird, there's a reason game protagonists tend to almost always be fictional characters.
 
I mean, for fuck's sake, the civilians bow to Yasuke as he walks around and he is intentionally designed to dwarf and brutalize his opponents. It feels like unironic BBC fanfiction.
That's the (((Melvin Kavinsky))) media clan's #1 fetish after all. Astroturfed by their hollyweird propaganda on us all since the 1960s.
To think Ubisoft and the kike "historian" could've avoided all of this by just making Niggasuke some NPC that the two Zipangese main characters interacted with (they could've gotten away with the historical revisionism in that case too). But nooooo, they just needed to make an afrocentrist "Asian people in New York" simulator and perform a ChiCom-like rewriting of history on Wikipedia and Britannica by using the "historian's" BNWO fanfiction. Now Ubisoft torpedoed one of their largest markets for their AnalCreed games and (((Thomas Lockley))) got kicked out as a professor and had his research retracted. OH NO NO NO BBCSISTERS WE GOT TOO COCKY :story:
This incident has really beefed up my "wikipedia was co-opted for mass semitic historical revisionism" case. It's simply too good to ignore, the information too damning, the agenda too blatant. I knew the french were hottentot-worshipping cuckolds, but this is an entirely new plateau.
 
It gets better and better. Sjws found their Uncle Tom to trot out that Yasuke "is a real samurai".

He's now been debunked after a major shitstorm in Japan.

IMG_20240722_210332.jpg
 
He's now been debunked after a major shitstorm in Japan.

View attachment 6219567
I'm guessing he is either related to Blackrock, or the communist party of Japan....

Also, I found a video of the Yakuza chatting with (((Thomas Lockley))). Heartwarming stuff.
 
A woman assassin makes sense in the AC world.
you had female assassins all the way back to revelations. or brotherhood if you include the multiplayer.

This is still dumb because Assassin's creed, from the out, relies on bloodlines and lineages. unless you're extremely recent corpses, I'm not believing any Ac protag is gay because most don't have the positions to get away with double-dipping and they have to have descendants for the goddamn plot to work.
ubisoft retconned the lore so they can explain how you can lezz out in odyssey. otoh they never really stuck to it, remember in the beginning you needed miles so they can use his genetic memory mcguffin. come black flag and it's literally a videogame.

This entire game conceprually is strange but there's something extremely creepy about allowing players to determine the sexuality of a real person who actually existed.

That's fucking weird, there's a reason game protagonists tend to almost always be fictional characters.
I like it, because it's wokeness pushed into absurdity. you not only had THE black samurai running around in ancient japan, no he was also GAY (something that will go extremely well with we wuz players, but then those are shielded from being racist and sexist based on their minority status). shit like that was satire 10 years ago.

It gets better and better. Sjws found their Uncle Tom to trot out that Yasuke "is a real samurai".

He's now been debunked after a major shitstorm in Japan.

View attachment 6219567
apparently dude was part of the communist party before.
this whole yasuke thing reads like a fucking script with all the questionable coincidences... :story:
 
ubisoft retconned the lore so they can explain how you can lezz out in odyssey. otoh they never really stuck to it, remember in the beginning you needed miles so they can use his genetic memory mcguffin. come black flag and it's literally a videogame
Black Flag used "thanks to a genetic donor you can experience his ancestor's memories"

Also doesnt Odyssey's dlc retcon the lezzing out bit by Kassandra marrying a man? I think they were pissed off at that (on twitter)
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mary the Goldsmith
It gets better and better. Sjws found their Uncle Tom to trot out that Yasuke "is a real samurai".

He's now been debunked after a major shitstorm in Japan.

View attachment 6219567
I don't know if it is just my intuition but the moment he pops out of nowhere, make a series of tweets that somehow garnered attention all of the sudden, my immediate thought is that it's not honest and probably was boosted by retards. Glad that it is the case.
Retarded Responses from Ubisoft:
View attachment 6224336

View attachment 6224334

View attachment 6224339

View attachment 6224340


Archive

Since this is the fake nigger, no more real WAKANDA. This game gonna bombed hard, isnt it?
TL;DR lots of words that ultimately meant nothing, deflection and gaslighting. Even the Japanese translation of this on Ubisoft JP is fucking lazy.
 
Black Flag used "thanks to a genetic donor you can experience his ancestor's memories"

Also doesnt Odyssey's dlc retcon the lezzing out bit by Kassandra marrying a man? I think they were pissed off at that (on twitter)
they did, also the b-team threw some shade via achievements that caused some butthurt. but that was before major people at ubisoft got #metoo'd, after that they became even more lazy and dumb.

Retarded Responses from Ubisoft:
View attachment 6224336

View attachment 6224334

View attachment 6224339

View attachment 6224340


Archive

Since this is the fake nigger, no more real WAKANDA. This game gonna bombed hard, isnt it?
"long cherished dream" yeah fuck you, people have been asking for a for an asscreed japan for over a decade only to repeatedly get told to fuck off.

"it was never our intention to represent asscreed as factual representation of history"..

two pages in and I'm legit MATI about those french leafcuck niggers
 
Retarded Responses from Ubisoft: (snip)
Link
IMG_7782.jpegIMG_7783.jpeg
I love the spoiler feature <3
I love taking screenshots <3
Maybe posted already, maybe not.
IMG_7816.jpegIMG_7818.jpegIMG_7819.jpegIMG_7820.jpeg
linked article about the professor from above tweet
IMG_7785.jpeg
IMG_7784.jpegIMG_7786.jpegIMG_7787.jpeg
Original
In the end, they said it was still in development, but the movie was 100% about the game content.
When it comes to improving the game content, I personally would like it to be 90% improved.

And it's all been wrong from the start.

Let me just say the conclusion: just making this comment when the improvements have not been specifically written is a negative thing.

If you could improve it, here are some concrete examples:
① Change the main character from Yasuke to a fictional character (ninja).
② The four seasons were all messed up, so if it's summer, I'll unify it as summer. I'll make it look like that.

If your company is going to make a statement like this, please provide concrete examples of improvements.
As things stand now, nothing has been improved and it has caused a fuss, so they can just fix it as they see fit.
IMG_7788.jpegIMG_7789.jpegIMG_7791.jpegIMG_7793.jpegIMG_7794.jpegIMG_7795.jpegIMG_7796.jpegIMG_7797.jpegIMG_7798.jpegIMG_7799.jpeg
Original
I've played almost all of the previous games, but I especially love Assassin's Creed Origins.
Origins was a story about Bayek, an Egyptian whose culture and religion are completely different from ours.
To be honest, in the beginning of the game, the characters' views on life and death, customs, and religious terminology were all foreign to me, and I found many parts difficult to get into.
However, as I played the game, these skills naturally came to me and I felt like I was able to identify with Bayek, who has a completely different cultural background to us. It was a wonderful game.
I also believe that there is no other work that excels in constructing the world of Egypt at that time.
So, in the original Famitsu interview, it was written that in order to depict medieval Japan, "we were looking for a samurai who could represent us, even though we are not Japanese."
I am very disappointed with this statement. There may be a difference in the nuance of the translation, but I couldn't believe that it was coming from the company that made Origins.

I think what's most worrying about this current uproar is whether or not this game is contributing to historical revisionism.
To be honest, the issues involved are beyond my ability to handle, so I will leave that to the experts, but the thing that worries me the most is the fundamental philosophy behind how the world is depicted in this game.
Rather than a "depiction that pursues detailed realism" like Origins, which recreates the world of that time in a game, I strongly hope for an "experience that allows you to become one with that world."
As a fan of the series, I hope that Shadows doesn't end up being just a work set in Japan during the Sengoku period.
IMG_7800.jpegIMG_7801.jpeg
IMG_7781.jpeg
IMG_7803.jpeg
I ain’t gonna translate this myself fuck that I got shit to do

To begin with, there are four points to focus on in this Lockley issue.

*If you don't know this, you won't be able to see the problem, so please spread the word.

① There is a problem with Rockley's "work itself"

· Edited Wikipedia Japanese and English by myself → Used as evidence in my own paper *Bad point 1

・The content is different between Japanese and English *Major point 2

-Edited not only Wikipedia but also Britannica's Yasuke entry (this is currently a work in progress)

・There is a lot of creativity. The content of the part where he claims to have created it himself is even more messed up.

② There is a problem with Rock Lee's "authored content"

-The creative part is by far the worst.

・He was deified as Daikokuten, Yasuke delivered Nobunaga's head, and many more.

The Jesuits were poor and had no slaves; powerful people competed to use black slaves as symbols of authority.

Although this part is a creation, it is a malicious fabrication of impression replacement *Malicious point 3

・``Overseas, this creative part is considered to be fact.'' Why did it happen?③

③ There is a problem with Rock Lee's "author promotion"

・Lockley conducts interviews based on his writings, but in doing so he exaggerates the story.

・At that time, some of the original parts are expressed as if they were facts *Major point 4

・Prominent media such as CNN did the same thing, and the "Rockley view of history" was widely disseminated.

・So, if you bring up "only works" in the discussion of authenticity, you will not be able to see the entire Lockley problem.

④ There is a problem with Rock Lee's "use of copyright"

・Overseas, this is treated as the only English material about Yasuke and is not considered to be a work of fiction.

・The creative part where black slaves were used competitively is being used for political correctness.

・A growing number of rumors are being created overseas, including literature and AI images, based on this work.

- Rock Lee is not complicit in the hoax, but the hoax cannot be eradicated without destroying Oomoto's work.

・So the issue is not "Rock Lee didn't say or write! This is a hoax!"

(In fact, that issue was passed a month ago)

This problem

``The issue of his writings'' that created the ``Lockley historical view''

Based on the ``Lockley historical view'', ``Other hoaxes will be created without his hands.''

There are two problems.

In order to solve both problems, we have to treat his works as forgeries.
IMG_7804.jpegIMG_7805.jpegIMG_7806.jpegIMG_7807.jpegIMG_7808.jpeg
IMG_7809.jpegIMG_7810.jpegIMG_7811.jpegIMG_7812.jpeg
IMG_7813.jpegIMG_7814.jpegIMG_7815.jpeg
IMG_7822.jpegIMG_7823.jpegIMG_7824.jpegIMG_7825.jpegIMG_7828.jpeg
 
The nips really need to learn the Core Lesson that the Rooftop Koreans learned in LA in 1992.
The excuse for Assassin's Creed being "historical fiction" doesn't work anymore when Ubisoft has publicly made its creative directive to force diversity down people's throats. The intent of this is pure blackwashing of history.
FIFY. How the fuck did you miss that?
 
Back