Astronauts stranded in space due to multiple issues with Boeing's Starliner — and the window for a return flight is closing

Archive/Sauce

Astronauts stranded in space due to multiple issues with Boeing's Starliner — and the window for a return flight is closing​


Two NASA astronauts who rode to orbit on Boeing's Starliner are currently stranded in space aboard the International Space Station (ISS) after engineers discovered numerous issues with the Boeing spacecraft. Teams on the ground are now racing to assess Starliner's status.

Astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams were originally scheduled to return to Earth on June 13 after a week on the ISS, but their stay has been extended for a second time due to the ongoing issues. The astronauts will now return home no sooner than June 26th, according to NASA.

IMG_9459.jpeg

After years of delays, Boeing's Starliner capsule successfully blasted offon its inaugural crewed flight from Florida's Cape Canaveral Space Force Station at 10:52 a.m. EDT on June 5. But during the 25-hour flight, engineers discovered five separate helium leaks to the spacecraft's thruster system.

Now, to give engineers time to troubleshoot the faults, NASA has announced it will push back the perilous return flight, extending the crew's stay on the space station to at least three weeks.

"We've learned that our helium system is not performing as designed," Mark Nappi, Boeing's Starliner program manager, said at a news conference on June 18. "Albeit manageable, it's still not working like we designed it. So we've got to go figure that out."

The return module of the Starliner spacecraft is currently docked to the ISS's Harmony module as NASA and Boeing engineers assess the vital hardware issues aboard the vessel, including five helium leaks to the system that pressurizes the spacecraft's propulsion system, and five thruster failures to its reaction-control system.

After powering the thrusters up on June 15, engineers found that most of these issues appeared to be at least partially resolved, but their exact causes remain unknown.

However, the Harmony module's limited fuel means Starliner can only stay docked for 45 days, so the window for a safe return flight is narrowing.

The issues are the latest in a long list of setbacks and headaches for Boeing's spacecraft. The company built the Starliner capsule as a part of NASA's Commercial Crew Program, a partnership between the agency and private companies to ferry astronauts into low Earth orbit following the retirement of NASA's space shuttles in 2011. SpaceX's Crew Dragon also came from this initiative and has racked up 12 crewed flights since it began operating in 2020.

But Starliner's first uncrewed test flight in 2019 was scuppered by a software fault that placed it in the wrong orbit, and a second attempt was held back by issues with a fuel valve. After more reviews last year, the company had to fix issues with the capsule's parachutes and remove around a mile (1.6 kilometers) of tape that was found to be flammable.

The current mission is Boeing's third attempt to take the crew to the ISS. The previous two were scrubbed by a vibrating oxygen valve on the United Launch Alliance's Atlas V rocket on which Starliner was mounted (and which was developed by Lockheed Martin) and a computer glitch in a ground launch sequencer, respectively.
 
Further proof that DIE leads to failure. Like Chris-chan level failure.

Because inevitably, these people will try to deflect from the fact that this is happening due to growing incompetence due to shitty policy. Just like Chris when she's trying to prove that she isn't a failure.
DEI comes from marxists. What did you expect? They won't learn a damn thing. They'll change one minute thing and ask for another go.
 
Further proof that DIE leads to failure. Like Chris-chan level failure.

Because inevitably, these people will try to deflect from the fact that this is happening due to growing incompetence due to shitty policy. Just like Chris when she's trying to prove that she isn't a failure.
It's compounded by the DEI that takes up the maintenance team for each plane or even this spacecraft. So not only do you have nowhere near qualified people designing these things, you have people who are lucky they figured out how to breathe maintaining them.
 
thought your blood boiled in space.
It depends on whether you are on the shade or recieving sunlight. As there's no atmosphere and a weak magnetic field, all energy hits you with full force, but because there isn't a medium to allow for convection, there also isn't a way for energy that isn't hitting you to easily reach you
 
"We've learned that our helium system is not performing as designed," Mark Nappi, Boeing's Starliner program manager, said at a news conference on June 18. "Albeit manageable, it's still not working like we designed it. So we've got to go figure that out."
This is the sort of shit that we call "Tempting Fate", what the fuck man. The fact that "One of the engines has a surprise hole in it" doesn't lead to the entire capsule being pulled and torn down to see "How" and "Will it happen to the others" is a damning thing, and really shows how thick the kiddie gloves have been with Boeing on this whole project. Its good to have an Alternative from SpaceX and the Russians, but an unreliable deathtrap is not the alternative you want. You don't take these kinds of risks with a manned mission.
Back when they found the first leak, did I call it or did I fucking call it? Turns out the "One leak in the helium system" was actually five damned leaks, that they would have found if they'd actually called the abort and torn down the capsule like they should have - Because they couldn't explain the source of the first leak.
 
From wikipedo: “The problem had occurred on the same aircraft during its immediately preceding flight, and the pilots had recovered using a standard checklist for such a "runaway stabilizer" condition.

During the accident flight, the AoA sensor again fed erroneous data to the MCAS, which pushed the nose of the aircraft down. The pilots did not properly follow the checklist, with the result that MCAS remained active and repeatedly put the aircraft into an unsafe nose-down position until it crashed into the water.”

The second flight also had similar pilot fuckups. Boeing did some shady shit but the biggest mistake they made was assuming pilots knew how to fly a fucking plane instead of monitoring a doggam autopilot.
No, the biggest mistake they made was having an AoA sensor and also MCAS that kept trying to plow the plane into the ground. Deviating from the checklist isn't good, but blaming the pilots for a system that repeatedly tardrages is wrong. It was found to be responsible for two fatal crashes that resulted in one of several groundings of the 737 MAX, not checklist deviations, not CFIT, none of that.

The people who bitch the most about checklist deviations on aircraft that narrowly avoid being plowed into the ground are often the manufacturers absolutely assblasted that a flight crew made them look like dumbasses. Meanwhile Ethiopia Flight 302 had the flight crew blindly trusting MCAS right up until it slammed into the ground. They did deviate from the checklist, but only because they were too busy trying to figure out what the hell was happening. MCAS, as far as they knew, was working fine and there were no displayed AoA disagreement errors. It was a failure to adequately manage crew resources and a failure to maintain situational awareness. (also the First Officer had like 200 hours lmao)
 
What are the chances the astronauts are saying this? "Call up Elon, I'm not riding back in that death trap."

90%?
That's about 40% too low.
Do you think Boeing has gone the route of Microsoft and hired a bunch of streetsh*tters to do coding and engineering?
They have been for years. I wouldn't trust their planes at all and the fact that Boeing hasn't had its shit stomped in is because of the US government protecting America's last major plane manufacturer.
 
That was my first thought too.
Something about the commander being unconscious?
It's a cover up now
Just looked it up. The Starliner docked on June 5th and the medical emergency broadcast was on June 13th. The medical emergency was the commander had serious, possibly lethal decompression sickness. The broadcast was the same day they were supposed to do a spacewalk which was subsequently cancelled due to "space suit discomfort" and not done at all. There is another one scheduled for Monday with the same chick, but a different male crew member.
 
Columbia is pretty fresh in the mind for Boeing to take their usual "ah, the crew will manage" attitude to this problem.
Problem is there's only 2 other options:
  1. Soyuz, a Russian spacecraft that is in basically unmodified since the 1960s and is remarkably reliable with only 2 fatal accidents (the second one made it widespread for all, of mandatory spacesuits for launch and landing, so even if the cabin is depressurized, the crew is kept alive in their suits)
  2. SpaceX, Elon's masterpiece which flies 4 astronauts
So, you either got evil Musk which the current Biden administration and liberal media and Boeing seethes daily at(Boeing because SpaceX killed their monopoly on billion dollar contracts to launch satélites for the US government using 1960s rockets for twice as much as a falcon 9)
Or Putin, which would be the pinnacle of bad press for both:
"A evil nazi rescuing 2 astronauts?!? Also isn't Russia supposed to be all inept and dumb idiots who can't do nothing right?"


They most likely won't die in a reentry if the capsule leaks atmosphere, but the helium is used for the maneuvering thrusters, so if it fails, they can't control it anymore and they probably will burn on re-entry.

I don't doubt like Columbia that NASA will be politically forced to risk it and probably kill 2 astronauts, just so to not give Musk or Putin the time of the day.
 
Back