Alright. I'll say it. I was wrong. The last eight pages were trash.
I'll give you credit for admitting you were wrong on the internet instead of just fading off into the sunset like some other defenders when stuff came out that was absolutely shit. Though I feel kind of bad, because a lot of the stuff I said just came true like Paradis being a burning wreck and nothing ever getting solved.
At uh, at least there's the soundtrack? I guess?
I’d say it’s more “13-15 year old Japanese boys (or whatever the shonen age demographic is) don’t really care for romance in their manga”. But I think you’re right. Hell, when was the last time a romance in a shonen manga actually got some significant development as the manga went on that wasn’t “will they or won’t they?” teasing/baiting?
What video are we talking about?
This video, which basically foreshadows Eren murdering his friends and the world, but in the end making the world a peaceful, but better place.
I do kind of feel like his editors made him change it. And when he couldn't have what he wanted, he defaulted to 'hurting' his audience by just being a fucking cunt. I mean, I don't care, I find the whole thing fucking hilarious. I've never seen a story rendered utterly pointless before. Nothing is resolved. Titans are still around, Paradis seems to be utterly annihilated back to the stone age, and the conflict is just going to happen all over again.
Its really funny, basically going 'lol Eren was right, but it still happens anyway'. I think its idiotic and hilarious, and he didn't hurt me but made me laugh my ass off at how he deceived people into thinking he was some sort of genius and then and goes and releases an extended cut of the ending that just stomps on people that liked it, removing all ambiguity that MAYBE things worked out (they didn't). Its like Bran becoming King because he tells the best stories level of retardation.
I know people said its not worth talking about, but I can't help myself because it is just so bad, that it is a lesson in awful story-telling. Plot, characterization, foreshadowing, tone, genre, pacing...its really all here.
Why couldn't it be Isayama??
Because if it was Isayama, then Attack on Titan would be cemented as legendary. Berserk has now been cemented in myth and story-telling legend, a Shakespearean tragedy of a great, unfinished masterwork, in which our imaginations will carry the will of Miura, making the ending greater than anything we would have seen with our own eyes. With his death, he has become immortal. Let Isayama shit in his onsen.
I love how the Erenfags are now blasting Isayama for just continuing to dump loss after loss on Eren when I'm pretty that's supposed to be intentional at this point. He's intentionally shitting on Eren because he wants to hurt the fanbase, and also because he probably thinks it's really funny.
They are so fucking pissed.
"B-But, Jeankasa had no development...!" Yeah, and? It's still better than shipping Mikasa with the guy who genocided the entire world just because he couldn't just admit his feelings for her. Jean's trash, but Eren's a goddamn landfill.
The best part is that I think Isayama clearly hates Erenfags since they are the most vocal to shit on everything and he probably wanted Eren to not be idolized so he went out of his way to shit on them while giving every other character a good end (except for the nameless citizens of Paradis in the future while the named characters just die of old age or something since it looks like it has been a century since the ending when the city got bombed judging by the architecture of the buildings).
I mean, its really hard for me to think about. Did Isayama have the genocide ending in mind? It seems like it, because every piece of foreshadowing pointed to it. To do such a harsh 180 in the last few chapters seems very strange. But he might have. He is CLEARLY shitting on people who liked Eren and basically mocking them at this point, with Jean getting the girl and having him sitting in the puddle of piss crying like a baby.
Yeah but most Shounen shit authors do this. Why is Naruto with Hinata? She liked him hundreds of chapters ago. Why is Orihime with Ichigo? She liked him hundreds of chapters ago. Why is Jean with Mikasa?
It's like the Chekov's Gun of romance. Manga authors set it up to prepare for the ending and then draw the manga until their editors say stop, and hook up the couple.
Its just there as a constant hook and its a very very very very old device where mangaka didn't think their mangas would last long, so the will-they or won't-they kept people from buying. Its generally why I like seinen better, because romance is generally more straightforward.
Some Shonen has been getting better with this, giving subtle cues to the audience its not going to happen, like Black Clover, where Asta is autistic and is in love with a celibate nun, not even giving a shit if other women want him