ATTN: Joshua Connor Moon and the "board of directors" of LOLCOW, LLC

Should Josh and Lolcow Cave To Miss Tommie's Demands

  • Yes

  • No

  • Maybe

  • Screw both of them. Let's revolt!

  • Frank Ireland doesn't care and neither do I.


Results are only viewable after voting.
why should i bother? you can't prove any of them and what you make think of me is of no consequence to me , colonized creeper. go find another target. you're going to look really stupid ten years from now for obsessing on me the way you're doing.
I see you forgot what you were responding to. Let me refresh your memory. You claimed we were responsible for causing several suicides. I pointed out that in every single case where we’ve been accused, either there was no link with us or there was no suicide. The burden of proof is on you. If you choose not to provide that proof, that’s fine - it just means you’ve made a fool of yourself once again, the way you do every hour of every day.
Why should I? Nobody is getting sued any time soon, but you'll seen proof that i've got an attorney soon enough , when josh starts begging for money to defend himself from him.
You know there’s literally an entire section of this forum dedicated to people taking legal action against the Farms, right? You’re acting like you’re some pioneer here. You aren’t. You’re doing nothing that hasn’t already been done many times before.
nice projection of the denial of your pea brained hatred of your own ignorant self , you stupid fuck bag

But it is all libelous from the introduction on down. i am none of the things this pack of self loathing degenerates project at me.
Well, you’re going to have to do a lot better than that in court. As we have explained, if you want to take us to court like a big boy, you have to have specifics.

However, I’m going to counter your claim of libel with one against you. You have no evidence to back your repeated claim that we have “paraphiliac fantasies.” I’ll see you in court, Mr Wasserberg, and I will be pushing for the death penalty, I know that’s not usual in cases of libel, but I’m sure the judge will make an exception for a dogfucker such as yourself.
 
Wait a second. If this toothless pedophile is going to file a civil case and someone was crazy enough to pay lawyers to go through with it, they would get to depose this faggot.

Just imagine what you could do, legally in a deposition to the individual. You'd be in a room with this retard and his lawyer. Whatever crazy charges he tries to bring up against you, you'd have a mountain of evidence to refute ANYTHING he says. What's worse is this retard has been participating in all of it and admitting to MORE criminal acts. You could even potentially get truthful answers to things he's avoided unless he enjoys contempt/perjury charges.

I'm just a retard that's taken a recent interest in the law but even if Tommy was somehow tried to be considered a public figure and has an image that can be defamed, proving intent is damn near impossible. That's what has made the Project Veritas case getting past the initial motion to dismiss with the New York Times was such a big deal.

Tommy, I believe, you are an old, toothless, dog raping faggot and a waste of life. Please, sue me for my opinion. Libel is hard to prove and I doubt it'll get past an introductory motion to dismiss.
 
If I am not mistaken, the following statement "...and you're going to pay me a hundred dollars a month for the privilege of abusing my name and image on your site with no restrictions..." constitutes a legal offering made that is separate from the request to run the forum and legally stands as a contract. She did not say this was conjoined with the other request to run the forum, ergo it is a separate legal offer.

Therefore I propose we all donate to Null for a year and indeed pay this woman $1200 and indeed come up with the most horrific photoshopped content we can imagine and accept her offer. Moreover, I suggest we advertise that this content is indeed sanctioned and approved by them.

It is a legally binding offer.

I also note she said "your site" so if the owner has "another site" in the persons country, she has sanctioned libel content against herself.
 
Last edited:
Tom “hiring a lawyer” could mean anything.

In one Video He talked about one of his best friends who is a nurse. Then a couple videos later he accidentally revealed this friend was a psych nurse at the asylum he has an annual sojourn at.

Tom also thinks being in the same room as someone or encountering them in a crowd is tantamount to meeting them being their friend.

Plenty of the old hippy losers he talks about are evidence of that. He claims he’s friends with some lowlife hippy or wagon burner faggot and it turns out he just saw them at some gathering.

This lawyer could be someone who dropped a card from their briefcase at the courthouse by accident. Or something else equally pathetic
 
has no one else been to the firm's website? this is a very serious and real thing that is totally going to happen in the next few months and i for one am terrified that Tommy will seize all my internets and then what will we have, eh? THEN WHAT?

PS: this dude here is my favorite:
1640356140437.png
 
has no one else been to the firm's website? this is a very serious and real thing that is totally going to happen in the next few months and i for one am terrified that Tommy will seize all my internets and then what will we have, eh? THEN WHAT?

PS: this dude here is my favorite:
View attachment 2825853

I made this after listening to Tom's call with Greg from Diamondback legal during the 9 hr spergathon lol:
 

Attachments

  • attachments.png
    attachments.png
    172.3 KB · Views: 32
has no one else been to the firm's website? this is a very serious and real thing that is totally going to happen in the next few months and i for one am terrified that Tommy will seize all my internets and then what will we have, eh? THEN WHAT?

PS: this dude here is my favorite:
View attachment 2825853
They all look like extras from The Sopranos. Clearly a crackshot legal team.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Just A Butt
All the dudes are fastening their cufflinks.

lol.

I mean, to be fair, it sounds like these people are professionals:

A news editor rarely wants to get a call from an attorney, but Dorrian Horsey was persistent and polite, provided all the relevant details we needed and we were able to come to a resolution that was satisfactory for her client and upheld the standards of our news organization.
Noah R. Bombard, MassLive Managing Editor

So it'll be interesting whether they keep going once the true scope of Tom's... problem becomes apparent.

Assuming he's even actually in contact with them at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Unabomber11
watching you make a fool out of yourself gets better every day, cupcake.

View attachment 2820314
This thread isn't doing any significant damage to your reputation or professional standing because you don't bring anything to the table to begin with.

You are not a celebrity who has suffered thousands and thousands of dollars in damages to your reputation. All you have is living in a vermin infested filthy hovel in Tucson busking for a few dollars on the street and maybe selling a few pieces of your rock jewelry at a local mineral show.

You are not going to sit there and "score a victory" on kiwifarms. You are just going to be taken to the cleaners for whatever modest inheritance was left for you.
 
i can assure you that our attorneys will have terms that will move the courts .

and what position is that? having a pack of morons wallpapering their brains with memes hating on me? that seems to be more like you are dumb and responsible for any consequences of your participation in this shit show you may find yourself in.

lol. chloe sagal then and how many more were driven to suicide by your harassment? How many thrill killings have you sick fucks inspired? How many 9-1-1 pranks have their been. your the creep, maggot.

lol. keep wallpapering your brain with all this self consumed sanctimonios interrogation, clown.

I will answer that last question. This is a good site with bad management. So is AMB. I would rather see the sites seized under eminent domain and the really bad actors prosecuted, while the actual community the site had built can go on in an actual public site that's managed fairly.

Chloe Sagal was severely mentally ill. The health/mental health systems failed her. In Chloe's suicide note, she specifically blamed mental health and homelessness for her actions. I can't remember if Brianna Wu was mentioned in the suicide note, but they were definitely mentioned in other notes/posts. Chloe blamed Brianna Wu for a lot of things. You could read the thread if you're curious and want to see Chloe's own words. I think Chloe's board on KF had been inactive for some time prior to her suicide, and she said on numerous occasions that she didn't care about it. A lot of the people discussed on this site never engage with it or mention it on any of their media. Again, as someone with a lot of trans folks in my life, I don't blame KF for Chloe's suicide. Did you know that Chloe was released from a psych hold far too soon, and self-immolated later that same day? It's honestly disgusting to see so many of the "prominent" troons on Twitter point the finger at KF when they're far more culpable than a gossip website.

Fact is, people who put themselves in the spotlight have always prompted discussion from others. Some of it's good, some of it's bad. The internet made it easier for people to demand some sort of spotlight. It also made it easier for others to gossip about them. I haven't seen anything on this website that encouraged or prompted a killing. The widow of a trans woman who committed suicide actually came to KF and talked about their experience. Can't remember the name of their deceased (and estranged) spouse, but someone else probably knows who I'm talking about. That was another instance of people pointing the finger at KF when their own actions were far more culpable in that person's demise.

Insisting that KF is responsible for the actions of idiots/the mentally ill is dubious. Just because someone posted on a website doesn't mean they were encouraged to do whatever. You could make the same argument about any website they posted on, and it would be just as flimsy. Some people are idiots, period. Even with the latest trolling against you, Tommie, a lot of people here kept saying it was a troll, not serious, etc. Most people would look at that text discussing "Nigel Igger," roll their eyes, and delete it. You assume it to be the truth. The NIMH isn't targeting you or doing anything to you. Treating these troll ops as truths is only making you look bad in the eyes of TPD, the crisis folks, etc. And because you continue to post on these public forums, create YouTube content, etc., people are going to continue to discuss you, good and bad. Same as always.
 
But your own stated goal for hiring that lawyer was to sue Null.
what you think you may have read is of no consequence to me.
This thread isn't doing any significant damage to your reputation or professional standing because you don't bring anything to the table to begin with.

You are not a celebrity who has suffered thousands and thousands of dollars in damages to your reputation. All you have is living in a vermin infested filthy hovel in Tucson busking for a few dollars on the street and maybe selling a few pieces of your rock jewelry at a local mineral show.

You are not going to sit there and "score a victory" on kiwifarms. You are just going to be taken to the cleaners for whatever modest inheritance was left for you.
keep wallpapering your broken brain with this absurd nonsense, dweeb. i'm not going to spend a fucking penny and this site will either go dark this year or it will be in the possession of a group that will take it away from him. somebody with the money to spend will be committed to that. my attorney will be committed to helping my business grow and protecting my media from theft.
That's true. Lawyers are also supposed to render honest advice and not file frivolous shit.

Which is why this whole fantasy of yours is funny.
i don't know what fantasy you think i have. my attorney isn't suing null or lolcow. he's going to be sending him a letter with my terms for either paying me for the privilege of abusing my good name and image or removing all trace of me from this site if he refuses. There will be no frivolous bitch fest about internet butt hurt. there will be an airtight tort for invasion of privacy by misappropriation and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Chloe Sagal was severely mentally ill. The health/mental health systems failed her. In Chloe's suicide note, she specifically blamed mental health and homelessness for her actions. I can't remember if Brianna Wu was mentioned in the suicide note, but they were definitely mentioned in other notes/posts. Chloe blamed Brianna Wu for a lot of things. You could read the thread if you're curious and want to see Chloe's own words. I think Chloe's board on KF had been inactive for some time prior to her suicide, and she said on numerous occasions that she didn't care about it. A lot of the people discussed on this site never engage with it or mention it on any of their media. Again, as someone with a lot of trans folks in my life, I don't blame KF for Chloe's suicide. Did you know that Chloe was released from a psych hold far too soon, and self-immolated later that same day? It's honestly disgusting to see so many of the "prominent" troons on Twitter point the finger at KF when they're far more culpable than a gossip website.

Fact is, people who put themselves in the spotlight have always prompted discussion from others. Some of it's good, some of it's bad. The internet made it easier for people to demand some sort of spotlight. It also made it easier for others to gossip about them. I haven't seen anything on this website that encouraged or prompted a killing. The widow of a trans woman who committed suicide actually came to KF and talked about their experience. Can't remember the name of their deceased (and estranged) spouse, but someone else probably knows who I'm talking about. That was another instance of people pointing the finger at KF when their own actions were far more culpable in that person's demise.

Insisting that KF is responsible for the actions of idiots/the mentally ill is dubious. Just because someone posted on a website doesn't mean they were encouraged to do whatever. You could make the same argument about any website they posted on, and it would be just as flimsy. Some people are idiots, period. Even with the latest trolling against you, Tommie, a lot of people here kept saying it was a troll, not serious, etc. Most people would look at that text discussing "Nigel Igger," roll their eyes, and delete it. You assume it to be the truth. The NIMH isn't targeting you or doing anything to you. Treating these troll ops as truths is only making you look bad in the eyes of TPD, the crisis folks, etc. And because you continue to post on these public forums, create YouTube content, etc., people are going to continue to discuss you, good and bad. Same as always.
Yes, I was aware of all of those details, except i thought it was zinnia and her crowd she was getting played off of. The system was what was most at fault. The farms didn't do anything but cheer it all on, which is pretty much their involvement in all the death attributed to this site.

I never thought the threat was anything but bullshit, but there are reasons for playing the hand the way I did, to build a case against the lack of resources in local law enforcement and the refusal of the feds to share.

The NIMH is not likely to be involved with facebook.com/kjhoffman1969 , but there is a syndicate targeting me working through KF and AMB that josh and addy have nothing to do with.

I'm not concerned with people discussing me. nobody but idiots lend any credence to the pedophile dogfucker shit, but the stolen media has caused harm in the real world several times and i need to do something about shutting down the you tube channels.
 
what you think you may have read is of no consequence to me.
Read your own post, retard
i don't know what fantasy you think i have. my attorney isn't suing null or lolcow.

Screenshot_20211224-181718_Brave~2.jpg
There will be no frivolous bitch fest about internet butt hurt. there will be an airtight tort for invasion of privacy by misappropriation and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
You just said you weren't gonna sue him. That being said, you won't win on privacy torts and IIED. People, like Melinda, already tried.
I'm not concerned with people discussing me. nobody but idiots lend any credence to the pedophile dogfucker shit, but the stolen media has caused harm in the real world several times and i need to do something about shutting down the you tube channels.
"This website is not causing me any harm, but I'm going to sue for IIED"

Autistic
 
What's up with all this incomprehensible trash? Get sent to a retirement home, boomer.

Or better yet, die and let your sad Jew money become escheat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blablabla
@Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg
what you think you may have read is of no consequence to me.
Oh but it is, because if you plan on taking any legal action on these sites in any form, your words will be held against you.
keep wallpapering your broken brain with this absurd nonsense, dweeb. i'm not going to spend a fucking penny and this site will either go dark this year or it will be in the possession of a group that will take it away from him. somebody with the money to spend will be committed to that. my attorney will be committed to helping my business grow and protecting my media from theft.
You need to be committed. 100% sincerity, for your own good. Not because of dogs, or kids (though that's probably not a bad reason either) but because you are demonstrably a danger to yourself. Maybe not in a suicidal or self-mutilation way, but certainly in any other way possible.
i don't know what fantasy you think i have. my attorney isn't suing null or lolcow. he's going to be sending him a letter with my terms for either paying me for the privilege of abusing my good name and image or removing all trace of me from this site if he refuses. There will be no frivolous bitch fest about internet butt hurt. there will be an airtight tort for invasion of privacy by misappropriation and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
You're not going to sue, yet in the same paragraph say there's an "airtight tort". I don't think those words mean what you think they mean. Your media is here for good, and will continue to be archived here for good. Until you either die, or stop with this nonsense.
Yes, I was aware of all of those details, except i thought it was zinnia and her crowd she was getting played off of. The system was what was most at fault. The farms didn't do anything but cheer it all on, which is pretty much their involvement in all the death attributed to this site.
So, you're a dishonest little manipulative shit who will say whatever they want despite literally admitting afterwards that you are, in fact, a dishonest manipulative little shit.
 
Back