ATTN: Joshua Connor Moon and the "board of directors" of LOLCOW, LLC

[RadioactiveMonkeyMan]

Tommie once believed he could hear hackers on his PC, doing santeria rituals and torturing animals. He said prayers, called the police.

Turns out it was an ASMR video playing in a tab he'd left open.

If that doesn't sum up Tom, I really don't know what does. Real life technomage shit

 

[Smicneibn]

Quit your jobs and liberate your soul from the shackles of Zionist Babylonian Death Magic.

Tell us more about this Zionist Babylonian Death Magic that Kiwifarms practices.

 

[Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg]

Literally no.

No. The burden is on you to prove he did anything illegal, and to defeat his defenses, affirmative and not.

Same ideas didn't quite work for Russ and Mel. He could afford to fight them.


How are you going to defeat his CDA affirmative defense? Because ignoring everything else for a moment, if you can't beat that, you have no case for IIED, or anything else, torts included.

Also IIED is a retarded tort, and one which is hardly ever successfully proven in court due to an increadibly high burden on the plaintiff. Here's a fun fact, IIED has such a high burden that even acting "with an intent which is tortious or even criminal" or "intended to inflict emotional distress" or "aggravation which would entitle the plaintiff to punitive damages for another tort" are not enough to satisfy the requirments for a successful IIED claim. See Wallis v. Princess Cruises, Inc., 306 F.3d 827 (9th Cir. 2002), Su v Aster 978 F.2d 462 (9th Cir. 1992), Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46 (1965)

And you just killed your IIED claim. Congrats.

FYI i'm not the one filing it and it's being filed as a mass tort under the UK's anti-cyber bullying law. There is a group of people who are going to demonstrate to the court that this site is a threat to public safety and it will get handed over to the plaintiffs as settlement of the cash judgement against null and a bunch of fools whose posts do not qualify for first amendment protection or derivatives that qualify under fair use doctrine. I'm pretty sure that under the DMCA, his counterclaim needs to prove his right to do it.

Uh, no. From then on the burden is on you to either actually sue or to fuck off.

so then the burden is on you to prove that your derivative isn't infringing on anything and isn't libelous. good luck with that.

 

[blablabla]

raise your hand everyone who isnt a retarded pedo dogfucker who shits himself on the reg and will spend this holiday eating dinner with their loved family members instead of being a fucking retarded pedo dogfucker who shits himself on the reg like TOMMAS THE MAN

 

[BlueArmedDevil]

so then the burden is on you to prove that your derivative isn't infringing on anything and isn't libelous.

As the injured party the burden is on you or your attorney to prove the damages......

 

[Consider Lizärds]

FYI i'm not the one filing it and it's being filed as a mass tort under the UK's anti-cyber bullying law. There is a group of people who are going to demonstrate to the court that this site is a threat to public safety and it will get handed over to the plaintiffs as settlement of the cash judgement against null and a bunch of fools whose posts do not qualify for first amendment protection or derivatives that qualify under fair use doctrine. I'm pretty sure that under the DMCA, his counterclaim needs to prove his right to do it.

so then the burden is on you to prove that your derivative isn't infringing on anything and isn't libelous. good luck with that.

and why would Null's business interests be troubled by a UK judgement (that won't happen but lets imagine)?

 

[RadioactiveMonkeyMan]

raise your hand everyone who isnt a retarded pedo dogfucker who shits himself on the reg and will spend this holiday eating dinner with their loved family members instead of being a fucking retarded pedo dogfucker who shits himself on the reg like TOMMAS THE MAN

FYI i'm not the one filing it and it's being filed as a mass tort under the UK's anti-cyber bullying law. There is a group of people who are going to demonstrate to the court that this site is a threat to public safety and it will get handed over to the plaintiffs as settlement of the cash judgement against null and a bunch of fools whose posts do not qualify for first amendment protection or derivatives that qualify under fair use doctrine. I'm pretty sure that under the DMCA, his counterclaim needs to prove his right to do it.

well, I see that swiftly going nowhere fast.

 

[EmpireOfTheClouds]

FYI i'm not the one filing it and it's being filed as a mass tort under the UK's anti-cyber bullying law.

You don't even live in the UK, you faggot.

 

[Goofy Logic]

In this thread, dementia sets in and Tommy Tooter constantly forgets what he is even threatening.

Seriously, the more you run your mouth, the more incoherent you get, and the more concerned I get about your overall health.

 

[RedRocket69]

You don't even live in the UK, you faggot.

This nigger is so fucking retarded. If Josh is ever going to cave to anything, it will be a court order from the British

 

[The Southwest Strangla]

Hey tommy, are you going to call the cyber police on us?

 

[EmpireOfTheClouds]

raise your hand everyone who isnt a retarded pedo dogfucker who shits himself on the reg and will spend this holiday eating dinner with their loved family members instead of being a fucking retarded pedo dogfucker who shits himself on the reg like TOMMAS THE MAN

I'll spend it visiting mum and dad, eating delicious food, playing video games, watching the new season of Letterkenny, getting shitfaced, and, as always, unwrapping presents. Yano, like the best christmases.

Oh, and occasionally checking in to see Tom's latest spergs.

 

[Just A Butt]

good luck with that.

weird, i was just going to tell you that.

 

[Abu Muslim]

against null and a bunch of fools whose posts do not qualify for first amendment protection or derivatives that qualify under fair use doctrine.

That's your opinion, as is my opinion that you are a demented retard.

 

[SofondaCox]

All the shit he could have done. Bought for himself. Done to stabilize him in his dotage. Nope.

Greasy lawyers will take it all and nothing will ever come of it. Wonder how many people he has defrauded of 'investments' for the troon haven he
babbled about.

Judge "How were you defamed, Mr. Wasserblurg?"
Tom "They call me a pedophile dog fucker every goddamn day!"
Judge "Are you indeed a pedophile dog fucker?"
Tom "No! Those were isolated incidents of no consequence!!!"

Can't wait.

 

[Tragi-Chan]

lol. keep wallpapering your broken brain with all of these absurd suppositions, fan boy.

You know that “wallpapering your brain” doesn’t actually work as an idiom, right?

I'm a shadow banned underground superstar about to come out into the light of complimentary mainstream media exposure for the 50th Rainbow Gathering.

Doesn’t sound like you’ve been shadow banned if you’re doing events. Maybe you’re just not very good?

You're a fool with an opinion on a cyberstalking site that is going to change hands because null decided to go to war with one of the most powerful capitalists in the world's niece.

If it doesn’t, will you kill yourself?

lol. you fools may one day wake up and realize that you're the livestock in this zoo.

Well you see, old Tom, we are all aware that what we post here is in the public sphere and anyone can read it. They can judge it, form opinions on it, discuss it, even quote it elsewhere. We’re not like you, raging petulantly because people don’t form the “right” opinion on our words.

you can't contain me. nobody has ever been able to in my entire life.

Probably because they want to see how you’ll make an ass of yourself this time.

i earn my living by "gaining attention" , dweebs.

Yet another nail in the coffin of your legal action against the site.

like i said, what you think i wrote and what i wrote are two different things. null is going to get a letter first, properly worded, offering him a license. if he refuses, he's going to get a cease and desist order. if he persists in his refusal, there will be a DMCA takedown order and from there on, the burden of proof is on him to prove that he has the right to do what he's doing.

It’s called “fair use.”

defending himself is more than he can afford

You assume no one would chip in.

and he's either going to start paying me, or scrub me from the site and sanctioning people who talk shit about me on it.

Why are you so pathetic?

 

[joebobmurphy]

You're going to... make a case... through NIMH... for the Department of Health and Human Services... to seize the website and regulate it properly.

Yeah run that by your attorney you dogfucking moron, he'll be glad to put another hour at $180 on your invoice for a six minute phone call of pure delusion.



An individual can operate a business as an LLC. I was using sole proprietor vernacularly not as a legal term.

I missed that the first time. The Dept of Health and Human Services? My fucking god, how does this retard think they have any legal authority over the internet? Even if the farms was illegal, it would most certainly not be the HHS that shuts it down. Protip, Tom, if somebody commits a murder, the Library of Congress will not be the ones to execute the arrest. How the hell do you live this long and still have so little of a clue?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

FYI i'm not the one filing it and it's being filed as a mass tort under the UK's anti-cyber bullying law.

1. That's even worse
2. You repeatedly stated that you will be one of the people to sue him
3. UK does not have a "anti-cyber bullying" law
4. You repeatedly stated that you wish to use IIED, which is not a tort in UK
5. You repeatedly stated that you wish to use Invasion of Privacy tort, which also is not a tort in UK.

this site is a threat to public safety and it will get handed over to the plaintiffs as settlement

That makes no legal sense.

and a bunch of fools whose posts do not qualify for first amendment protection or derivatives that qualify under fair use doctrine.

Why not? You yourself admit we "troll" and mock you and your content. That's one of the factors that create fair use, and incidently, one of the strongest First Amendment protections. First Amendment has heavy protections in US law.

I'm pretty sure that under the DMCA, his counterclaim needs to prove his right to do it.

What matters is what defenses he will raise in a court of law, not in DMCA notice.

so then the burden is on you to prove that your derivative isn't infringing on anything and isn't libelous. good luck with that.

The burden is on you to prove that it is.

and why would Null's business interests be troubled by a UK judgement (that won't happen but lets imagine)?

Imagine the troubles on collecting on any such judgment. It might cost more to collect than Tom would gain.

 

[Leonard Helplessness]

Tom "They call me a pedophile dog fucker every goddamn day!"

And he uses “slut puppy” as an insult. Big thunk on that.

 

[Ultrapenguin]

lol. keep wallpapering your broken brain with all of these absurd suppositions, fan boy. I'm a shadow banned underground superstar about to come out into the light of complimentary mainstream media exposure for the 50th Rainbow Gathering. You're a fool with an opinion on a cyberstalking site that is going to change hands because null decided to go to war with one of the most powerful capitalists in the world's niece.

I'm the founding member of an artisan's cooperative older than you that's been operating under the radar for 37 years that's about to come rolling out of the desert with a guerrilla theater troupe after Valentine's Day.

Oh, wow, this is fun! You be a shadow banned underground superstar about to come out into the light of complimentary mainstream media exposure, and I'll be a fairy princess! Then we can build a pillow fort and have a tea party until mom tells us it's time to go to bed! Look, now I'm a law man, and I'm going to send those meanies to prison! Objection!

lol. you fools may one day wake up and realize that you're the livestock in this zoo. you can't contain me. nobody has ever been able to in my entire life. i earn my living by "gaining attention" , dweebs. Quit your jobs and liberate your soul from the shackles of Zionist Babylonian Death Magic.

I mean, you aren't really being contained, this isn't really a zoo, and you don't really earn a living by "gaining attention". You're more like a sort of fat mentally slow cat that keeps coming around begging for scraps and everyone feeds you because watching you blunder around makes people laugh and they know you'd die otherwise.

Side note, this is a really unhinged and egotistical rant even for you. Are you tweaking or are you just sad and nursing your ego because you've realized this lawsuit thing is never going to work?