UN Australia and Canada pull rape and incest game that tells players to be 'women's worst nightmare' - The following story contains reference to sexual assault, violence against women and misogyny.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
L/A
IMG_2944.webp
The computer game "No Mercy" centres around a male protagonist who is encouraged to "become every woman's worst nightmare", and "never take no for an answer.". Picture: No Mercy on Steam

By Asher McShane
A game that touts itself as an "incest and non-consensual sex' simulator has been pulled from the world's biggest PC gaming platform in Australia and Canada as pressure mounts on UK authorities to follow suit.

The computer game "No Mercy" centres around a male protagonist who is encouraged to "become every woman's worst nightmare", and "never take no for an answer."

Technology Secretary Peter Kyle, who is responsible for overseeing the government's online safety strategy, described the game as "deeply worrying" and demanded the tech giant take it down.

The game launched on Steam last month and is described by its own developers as containing violence, incest, blackmail, and what they describe as "unavoidable non-consensual sex."

After LBC revealed it was still available on Steam in the UK, it emerged that Australian and Canadian officials had swiftly made it unavailable for download.

Officials in Australia pulled it for being ‘unclassified’. A spokesman for Australia’s department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts said: “The computer game, No Mercy, is unclassified and has now been removed from sale from the Steam platform in Australia.”

Efforts to have the game removed in Australia were spearheaded by campaign group Collective Shout who wrote to the country’s regulator as well as launching a global petition.

After a public backlash the game was also removed from Steam in Canada after less than 24 hours.

Pepe Di'Iasio, General Secretary of the Association of School of College Leaders told LBC: “Just copy Australia. Australia seems to have got a grip on this, they seem to have acted swiftly.

"They realise they have to protect young people who are at the heart of this… I think that we’ve got a game of tennis taking place between Ofcom and tech companies, what we’re seeing is people blaming one another.

"Let’s get the legislation doing what it should do and let’s make sure we can protect the young people who are most at threat from this right now.”
IMG_2945.webp
The video game has 'very positive' reviews from sick users on Steam. Picture: Steam

The game requires a card to buy, but has minimal age-verification checks, with campaigners warning it could be downloaded by children.

“Adult themes exist in video games, but I’m so shocked and surprised by this,” LBC's tech correspondent Will Guyatt said.

“There's probably about 3.5 million active Steam accounts in the UK… I just don't see how this can be openly, easily available and also importantly not removed when people like myself have reported it as unsuitable.”

LBC created a Steam account with full access to adult content by simply ticking boxes claiming to be 18+, and was able to download No Mercy for £9.99.

“Tech companies make it as easy as possible for kids to go on and put in a fake age and put in a card,” child mental health expert Nova Eden said.

She says many parents will be under the misconception that sites like Steam are “a game shop, a social network,” and therefore assume they are properly moderated.

In reality, Steam is not signed up to any age-rating frameworks like PEGI, a content rating system established to help European consumers make informed decisions when buying video games through the use of approved age recommendations and content descriptors.

Anyone can upload a game for sale on the site, which then sits alongside products developed by regulated, mainstream games studios.

LBC reported the game to Steam as inappropriate five days ago. It has still not been taken down, or subject to more stringent controls.
IMG_2946.webp
The game's presence online also raises questions about the regulator Ofcom’s ability to properly moderate content.

It began its crackdown on harmful online content last month as part of the Government’s Online Safety Act, but the regulator told LBC it “can’t investigate individual complaints.”

That’s despite chief executive Dame Melanie Dawes saying as part of LBC’s Online Safety Day last month: “Our under-18s deserve a very different experience to the one they’re getting now, so no pornography, and a significant down-ranking of things like violent content, misogyny.”

The body is due to publish its “children’s codes” which will set out requirements for sites to protect young people online. Tech firms will then have three months to carry out risk assessments.

“I'm very interested to see how [Steam’s parent-company Valve] will justify that topics like this are acceptable in a game, and if they do deem them acceptable, they should make it a hell of a lot harder for your everyday consumer to be able to find,” Guyatt said.

“It's intriguing to see where this fits under the Online Safety Bill.”

Mr Kyle, who is facing pressure over the potential watering down of the Online Safety Act, insisted that Steam should remove the game from its marketplace.

He told LBC: “We expect every one of those [tech] companies to remove content as soon as they possibly can after being made aware of it. That’s what the law requires, it is what I require as a secretary of state, and it is certainly how we expect platforms who operate and have the privilege of access to British society, and British economy, to do.”

Mr Kyle also suggested that the regulator should make a call on whether the game should remain online.

"Ofcom is the regulator," Mr Kyle said. "They are tasked with enforcing and they will make the judgment as to whether content is removed in an appropriate time."

A spokesperson for the Games Rating Authority said:"Game ratings provide parents and players information about the content of video games.

In the UK, physical game releases must carry a PEGI age rating by law. Digital games are not legally required to carry an age rating, but the majority of leading stores use the trusted PEGI age rating process to provide confidence to consumers.

Although games on Steam can optionally apply for a PEGI age rating via our classification process, it is not mandated by the platform prior to a game's release.

The Games Rating Authority has not classified this game and has not been approach to classify it since its release."

Steam did not respond to LBC's requests for comment.
 
Making a big stink about this retarded piece of goonerware was probably a worse outcome than it simply existing. It probably would have only been picked up by a few degenerate soulless freaks and then disappeared into rancid depths of coomer games on Steam. This is pure Streisand effect, making way more people aware of a shitty VN porno game than there really needed to be. Makes me wonder if the devs are still selling it elsewhere.
 
regular sexual desires of men. It's all considered bad and toxic by women these days
Did you ever see the fucking front page of literally any mainstream porn site?
"Tricked", " blackmailed", "sister, "brother", "stepmom", "sleeping", "drunk", "coed", "babysitter"...

The sexual desires of many men are bad and toxic. I'm not Freud, but it's telling that you chose this thread to protest the perceived vilification of your sexual desires.

I'm not gonna fall into a moral panic just because this kind of content was now on Steam as well, for a minute or two. But there are some very real problems apparent in our world, which we should start dealing with sooner rather than later.
 
Did you ever see the fucking front page of literally any mainstream porn site?
"Tricked", " blackmailed", "sister, "brother", "stepmom", "sleeping", "drunk", "coed", "babysitter"...

The sexual desires of many men are bad and toxic. I'm not Freud, but it's telling that you chose this thread to protest the perceived vilification of your sexual desires.

I'm not gonna fall into a moral panic just because this kind of content was now on Steam as well, for a minute or two. But there are some very real problems apparent in our world, which we should start dealing with sooner rather than later.
Ok beta male feminists white knight.

LOL
 
The co-ed one is dumb, that's just college people fucking, but porn is bad for you man.
Porn isn't bad for anyone. That's just stupid shit women push because they don't like men getting off without the aid of a woman. Women like to use sex as a weapon against men. They want to gatekeep the ability for men to get off. Moral fags and prude fags also play a role in this as well. The moral fags and prude fags have joined forces with women to try and keep men from getting access to porn. Porn is just a masturbatory aid. It makes jerking off more fun.

Porn is completely harmless.
 
I think you're wrong, but I don't think you're going to be convinced by me of that. You might like the twitter thread about this though, it's just him dunking on women.
I'm not wrong. I'm 100% right. Porn doesn't have any negative effects on people. The only negative effect porn has is on women and their ability to use sex as a weapon against men and they don't like that.
 
The co-ed one is dumb, that's just college people fucking, but porn is bad for you man.
Tried to give it as an example with how porn always toes the line. If pimping out 16yos was legal, they'd be on the frontpage of pornhub. If 14yo were legal... 10yo...

Porn isn't bad for anyone. That's just stupid shit women push because they don't like men getting off without the aid of a woman. Women like to use sex as a weapon against men. They want to gatekeep the ability for men to get off. Moral fags and prude fags also play a role in this as well. The moral fags and prude fags have joined forces with women to try and keep men from getting access to porn. Porn is just a masturbatory aid. It makes jerking off more fun.
You do not register as a man to me, nobody here feels any need to keep you down, and I don't care how you mess up your own life.
But by glorifying porn, you sort yourself into the same category of subversive groomers as trannies, and should be treated as such.
 
Tried to give it as an example with how porn always toes the line. If pimping out 16yos was legal, they'd be on the frontpage of pornhub. If 14yo were legal... 10yo...


You do not register as a man to me, nobody here feels any need to keep you down, and I don't care how you mess up your own life.
But by glorifying porn, you sort yourself into the same category of subversive groomers as trannies, and should be treated as such.
I don't give two shits what you think.

Keep being a beta male feminist white knight. I am sure one day the feminist women will fuck you. Oh wait, they won't.
 
I'm also sure they weren't thinking about a world where women had control and were telling men they were toxic either or women reading books about getting dominated spanked and all kinds of other kinky shit. The founding fathers didn't have these problems because women were kept in their place where they belong.
those earlier societies also would shame you for masturbating and put you in the asylum, jail you or kill you for admitting you're okay with men expressing their rape fantasies. They still protected women from psychos who have a hateboner for women. Get off 4chan
 
those earlier societies also would shame you for masturbating and put you in the asylum, jail you or kill you for admitting you're okay with men expressing their rape fantasies. They still protected women from psychos who have a hateboner for women. Get off 4chan
If they understood why men use porn these days, they would understand. They were men after all.

I don't use 4chan.

But keep being a beta male feminist white knight. Hopefully that fat ugly feminist pussy was worth it. LOL

@Kiwisee
Porn is a form of sex trafficking, but go off.
Legal legit porn isn't. No one is trafficked to make that porn. Most of the female porn whores do their own traveling.
 
The only thing retarded here is you.
Nice rebuttal, dipshit.

Sorry, I didn't realize since I named myself after a character in a rape video game I enjoy it and was playing at time of sign up means I must act like him and rape women. I will be stalking my first target tonight. Thank you for enlightening me.
Gotta say, you're kinda walking into their arguments bud.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fall Bondler
Legal legit porn isn't. No one is trafficked to make that porn. Most of the female porn whores do their own traveling.

And how do you personally verify that what you're watching isn't an extortion clip? Or that one of the parties wasn”t trafficked?

How do you verify if the participants are even legal adults?

I'm curious. Think carefully before giving me a knee jerk response though, because there's a 99% chance I'll be making you look more retarded than you already do.
 
Last edited:
If they understood why men use porn these days, they would understand. They were men after all.
If you're talking about Christian societies, no. Sex was usually seen as a prerequisite for conception and marriage. Onanism, fornication and adultery were considered sins. All of history except here and now thought that getting your rocks off at any time isn't a right. If you want a trad society where women are property, you can't have your cake and eat it too. Also they'd call you crazy if you're ok with simulated rape, just like anyone offline. Touch grass

But keep being a beta male feminist white knight. Hopefully that fat ugly feminist pussy was worth it. LOL
You keep saying that with everyone. Are you mad about something? Skip to the part where you pull an elliot rodger. LOL
 
Last edited:
Back