Autists sperg about abortion

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Hope the slippery slope goes forward and they jump to sterilizing people next.
5084175.jpg


on one hand, Planned parent-hoods biggest ah... "consumer base" are blacks...

was this their plan all along?
 
Btw, this is really about NY legalizing third semester abortion but it applies to this bill too so fuck it.

https://townhall.com/columnists/nicksearcy/2019/01/29/gosnell-2-the-exoneration-n2540412

Gosnell 2: The Exoneration

“…I continue to feel optimistic of the eventual outcome…the vindication of what I’ve done, why I’ve done it and how [it] will become accepted within my lifetime.”

— Kermit Gosnell, after his conviction

On May 13, 2013, Dr Kermit Gosnell was convicted in Philadelphia of 3 counts of first degree murder for snipping, with scissors, the necks of infants who had been born alive, and 21 counts of felony late-term abortion, among other charges. His unlicensed staff members were convicted of “theft by deception” for performing medical procedures — abortions — for which they were untrained and unqualified. Stephen Massof, an unlicensed medical school graduate, pleaded guilty to two counts of third degree murder for snipping the spines of babies born alive according to Dr. Gosnell’s instructions. Many other members of his staff testified, in exchange for immunity, that they had participated in countless acts of “snipping.”

On Jan. 22, 2019, almost everything Gosnell and his staff did was legalized by the state of New York.

He was convicted of killing breathing infants that had already been born. It is now legal in New York to kill an infant that survives an abortion .

He was convicted of allowing untrained and unlicensed non-medical personnel to perform abortions. It is now legal in New York for non-physicians or any “health professionals” (undefined) to perform abortions.

He was convicted of performing at least 21 late-term abortions past the legal limit of 24 weeks. It is now legal in New York to terminate a pregnancy up until the due date. In New York, there is no longer any such thing as a “late-term” abortion.

Gosnell has consistently maintained that he was innocent, ahead of his time, and would someday be exonerated. He was right. He was just a few years early and in the wrong city. The State of New York has just exonerated him.

I would bet that Gosnell is now in his prison cell preparing his appeal for when the State of Philadelphia follows suit and passes their own version of New York’s law.

Many of the people who saw the movie I directed about Gosnell have reached out to me over the past two days, saying the same thing I thought to myself:

“My God, they just legalized every horror he committed.”

And many have asked me, in horror, how can this be? How can there be raucous cheers in the state house of New York for a bill that legalizes the murder of a newborn baby? How have we come to this point?

We got here, “comrades,” because the Left’s ultimate goal is the devaluation of all human life, not just that of the unborn child. And it is time to face that.


Throughout the world history of the socialist/communist Left, they have invariably become murderous against their own citizens. Stalin’s USSR, North Korea, Mao’s China, Cuba, Cambodia — in every place where they have achieved total control, they have imprisoned and murdered their political opponents by the millions, and justified this mass murder and terror by:

1) declaring all dissenters to be enemies of the almighty state and therefore a threat to every “comrade,” and;

2) outlawing religion, denying any divine aspect to human life, and therefore removing any reason NOT to murder an enemy of the people.

The officials who passed this law in New York and then cheered like they had cured cancer would not have been able to do so if they believed that a human being is a creation of God. They have to believe that a human being is just a biological accident with no soul, no divine spark, no plan from Heaven, — and therefore possessing no inherent reason to be preserved.

The supporters of this law love to use the word “unwanted” because that grants them the power over life and death. To them, if a life is “unwanted,” it is worthless, and if there is no higher power than their assessment, then that is, chillingly, the end of it. By their logic, they are right. If there is no God with an interest in human life, and no eternal consequence for human actions, it would be weak, silly, and sentimental NOT to do away with a life that was “unwanted” — whether infant, octogenarian, or dissident in the prime of his/her life.


Kermit Gosnell argued that even if the infant he aborted was past the 24-week period, his judgment about it should be the ultimate authority in deciding its gestational age. HE was the Supreme Power. What the Left ultimately wants to acquire is the power over life and death at ANY age, and that is why they have decriminalized Kermit Gosnell.

And history shows that they will not stop there.
 
You supported the idea that a baby wasn't legally a human being and this is where that road has ended. This is your fault.

Happy?

People can change their stances, Jesus H. Do you want people to become pro-life or not? Because your approach is about as appealing as an irrational REEEEing liberal.

And I'm not the one performing abortions, so kindly fuck off.

(Or is this a joke? I'm a part-time autist.)
 
Considering that a vast majority of late term abortions are wanted pregnancies where the fetus is completely FUBAR I think this law would be moreso so women arent forced to give birth to brainless zombabies or horrifying cyclops babies or Hartley Gremlins or whatever.

Beauty Parlor has some great threads on fucked up fundie tard babies btw.
 
Remember 300 Spartans died because this arsehole wasn't aborted.

ephialtes.gif


Don't let silly emotions get in the way of doing the right thing.
It wasn't that Spartans did abortions as much as they waited until the babies were born and then chucked right off a cliff if they showed any kind of deformity. He we spared because his mother hid him away before they got the chance to
 
People can change their stances, Jesus H. Do you want people to become pro-life or not? Because your approach is about as appealing as an irrational REEEEing liberal.

And I'm not the one performing abortions, so kindly fuck off.

(Or is this a joke? I'm a part-time autist.)

Yeah, I don't get that myself. I just wrote him off as an idiot. "Oh so now you see our side of the debate! Well fuck off we don't want you!" is a rather stupid political take.
 
Personally, I recommend Philip K. Dick short story "Pre-persons" that was his response to Roe v. Wade.

The story was a pro-life response to Roe v. Wade. Dick imagines a future where the United States Congress has decided that abortion is legal until the soul enters the body. The specific instant is defined by the administration, at present the moment a person has the ability to perform simple algebraic calculations (around the age of 12).
 
DO. NOT. HAVE. SEX. WITHOUT. BIRTH. CONTROL. IF. YOU. DO. NOT. WANT. A. BABY.
How is this fucking hard how many minutes does it take a burger flipper to earn enough money for a box of condoms?
It's effort, not cost. This is like asking someone to re-read what they post to the internet for spelling, grammar and punctuation.
 
If the baby is horribly deformed and has a very poor prognosis (like the Hartley Hooligans) then I could understand the argument to abort. But a perfectly healthy baby that’s capable of surviving outside the womb? Fuck off. Give it up for adoption if you can’t handle the responsibility.

Unless it’s an extenuating circumstance like the aforementioned deformity or the mother’s life being in danger, I have no sympathy for women who have late-term abortions.

This is the catch 22 the pro life movement lands itself into though, since it's basically an extension of the Religious arm of the Republican party at this point.

Woman aborts a child: She's a murderess

Woman has a child and raises it herself: She's a whore and a communist leech.

Woman gives the child up: Communism! Pay for your own children.

Child is fostered: She's literally satan for giving up her baby.

The proposal is insane, but the position of the pro life movement (pro birth is more accurate with the current state of things, nobody seems to really care once it leaves the womb) is so incoherant and scrambled it was always going to end up here.

The pro life platform literally decades later hasn't moved beyond "Turn or burn" and pining for a 50's idyll that never existed to begin with.

As a disclaimer, I am against abortion, but I view the pro life movement as a Thecon arm of the republican party for the most part entirely detached from reality.
 
Why is it that everytime you look, you find the modern real world news resembling decades old South Park gags? I swear this was the major discussion in "Cartman's Mom is a Dirty Slut"
5084175.jpg


on one hand, Planned parent-hoods biggest ah... "consumer base" are blacks...

was this their plan all along?

Actually yes. Do some research on Margaret Sanger. You may need a few stiff drinks.

Personally, I recommend Philip K. Dick short story "Pre-persons" that was his response to Roe v. Wade.

The story was a pro-life response to Roe v. Wade. Dick imagines a future where the United States Congress has decided that abortion is legal until the soul enters the body. The specific instant is defined by the administration, at present the moment a person has the ability to perform simple algebraic calculations (around the age of 12).

On the positive side of things. It would let us legally "abort" pretty much any Journalist, as they would never meet the standard for "having a soul" (Math is hard! Which is why they become Journalists!)
 
Woman aborts a child: She's a murderess

Woman has a child and raises it herself: She's a whore and a communist leech.

Woman gives the child up: Communism! Pay for your own children.

Child is fostered: She's literally satan for giving up her baby.

The views of the strawman party really aren't relevant to this conversation though. Only the first one is remotely accurate, and I'd think most people have a bit more thoughtful takes on it.
 
This is the catch 22 the pro life movement lands itself into though, since it's basically an extension of the Religious arm of the Republican party at this point.

Woman aborts a child: She's a murderess

Woman has a child and raises it herself: She's a whore and a communist leech.

Woman gives the child up: Communism! Pay for your own children.

Child is fostered: She's literally satan for giving up her baby.

The proposal is insane, but the position of the pro life movement (pro birth is more accurate with the current state of things, nobody seems to really care once it leaves the womb) is so incoherant and scrambled it was always going to end up here.

The pro life platform literally decades later hasn't moved beyond "Turn or burn" and pining for a 50's idyll that never existed to begin with.

As a disclaimer, I am against abortion, but I view the pro life movement as a Thecon arm of the republican party for the most part entirely detached from reality.
I’m willing to put my own asshole out here; I’ve always seen abortion as something that needs to be legal because there are circumstances where it’s the lesser of two evils. Sexual assault, mother is too young, mothers life is threatened etc. A tragedy in most cases but sometimes it’s the better option.
I lost the stomach to call myself pro-choice because of how ghoulish that faction became in the last few years.
 
The views of the strawman party really aren't relevant to this conversation though. Only the first one is remotely accurate, and I'd think most people have a bit more thoughtful takes on it.

I think it's quite relevant. It's a bit of a caricature, but one the pro life movement has never properly quashed decades later and carries a good deal of truth.

People are going to have sex, people are going to get pregnant, but the pro life movement is also tied to a party strongly against offering support for actually raising a child and activley encourages social stigma against those who do choose to have a baby rather than abort and hide their mistake.

On the other hand, the pro choice platform is ghoulish as @Cosmug says, but at the same time at least they're consistent and do address some if not all the symptoms of a problem.
 
Back