Bad Plastic Surgery - all the pics

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Hongourable Madisha said:
Crossposting from the Conehead thread: Steven Dawson lives in some kind of sheltered housing for higher-functioning tards, so he can't access Internet porn, so instead (as well as all the shelves and shelves full of porn DVDs he buys in Soho) he watches Babestation, basically a softcore camwhore TV channel. The "Babestation beauties" as he calls them all belong in this thread.
Ding dong, baby!

A selection of filler and botox horrors


Click to expand...
it's honestly shocking how bad some of these people look considering they're all probably under 30. Will this trend end, or will the technology get so good and so cheap that it will start looking good eventually?
 
CoolFool said:
This nose job before and after was posted on reddit, the comments love the results:
View attachment 7539663
While this isn't "botched" and it certainly isn't as bad as most of the stuff posted here, I think this is yet another example of completely unnecessary surgery that looks worse in the after. Yes, her nose wasn't "small", but it fit with her facial features just fine! She looked beautiful before, she had a nice and unique look. And sure, she still looks pretty in the after photo, but now she looks like Instagram Clone #1,092,074.

There needs to be a subreddit or thread for surgery results that aren't quite "botched" but still bad.
Click to expand...
Her chin looks huge and mannish in the after. Any reduction to her nose tip would have had that effect, because her chin is very strong and was only balanced by her original nose. Imo this is why surgeries lead to more surgeries. You fuck up your facial balance and suddenly your nose is no longer the problem, but you do need a chin reduction. Now your chin is the right size, but your cheeks look too fat in comparison, so it's time for buccal fat removal, and so on and on. Not saying this girl specifically will do any of that, but it's how many a cosmetic surgery addict has been born.
 
Another J-Hope picture I found. Koreans, it's time to STOP.
1750903780332.webp
 
Schauma mal said:
this girl got fillers while still in school
View attachment 7555581View attachment 7555580View attachment 7555579View attachment 7555578View attachment 7555577
Click to expand...
She looks like a discount penny from tbbt.
My cravat doesn't flutter said:
The Ugly Stepsister gives some insight into the barbarism of early cosmetic procedures, such as sewing false lashes onto a patient's eyelids.
Click to expand...
Looked it up and its all fake, there's no evidence for the sewing part.
 
cybertoaster said:
Looked it up and its all fake, there's no evidence for the sewing part.
Click to expand...
Not sure where you got that from. It's pretty well documented that early false eyelashes - by early, I mean the 1800s - were sewn onto the patient's eyelids.
From volume 22 of the Medic Record:

1750910862783.webp

From The Dundee Courier on 6 July 1899:
IRRESISTIBLE EYES

MAY BE HAD BY TRANSPLANTING THE HAIR.

a story from The Dundee Courier, 6 July 1899

If your eyes are unattractive you may make them irresistible by transplanting the hair. Transplanted eyelashes and eyebrows are the latest things in the way of personal adornment.

There are specialists who make a handsome living out of the process of transplanting hair from the head to the eyebrows or eyelashes. The specialist works by putting in, not on, the new eyelashes and brows wherever they are absent or grow thin, and so cunning is he in his work that not even the closest scrutiny can detect any difference.

By means of the new process, it is said, eyes which are at ordinary times only passable become languishing in their expression, while eyes which were previously considered fine have their beauty much enhanced.

This is the way new eyelashes are put in:–

An ordinary fine needle is threaded with a long hair, generally taken from the head of the person to be operated upon. The lower border of the eyelid is then thoroughly cleaned, and in order that the process may be as painless as possible rubbed with a solution of cocaine. The operator then by a few skilful touches runs his needle through the extreme edges of the eyelid between the epidermis and the lower border of the cartilage of the tragus. The needle passes in and out along the edge of the lid leaving its hair thread in loops of carefully graduated length.

When this has been done another length of hair is sewed through the lid until finally there are a dozen or more loops projecting. By this time the effect of the cocaine has been lost, and the operator is obliged to desist, and put off further “sewing of hair” for another sitting.

The next step in the process is cutting off and trimming the ends of the loops, and the result is a fine, thick, long set of eyelashes. It is the finishing touch, that is to come, that makes them look like nature’s own. When they are at first cut they stick out in the most singular fashion, giving the person operated upon the most uncanny look. The operator’s next step is to take curling tongs, made of silver, and no larger than knitting needles, and to give them the curve which is essential to perfect beauty. Then the eyes are carefully bandaged, and kept so until the following day.

Most of the hairs that have been transplanted take root and grow, but a few of them fall out, and have to be attended to. For the first month it is necessary to curl the new eyelashes every day, but after that they become properly assimilated, and it is not necessary to give them any further attention.

Eyebrows are doctored in the same way, but there is not so much pain associated with the process as there is in transplanting eyelashes.
Click to expand...
 
My cravat doesn't flutter said:
Not sure where you got that from. It's pretty well documented that early false eyelashes - by early, I mean the 1800s - were sewn onto the patient's eyelids.
From volume 22 of the Medic Record:

1750910862783.webp

From The Dundee Courier on 6 July 1899:
Click to expand...
The early turn of the century was the era of yellow journalism, they didn't sew hair or threads into their lashlines, that would not work as they would be immediately rejected as a foreign body and cause a massive infection, they also didn't have the types of synthetic threads we have today that are inert. This is obviously false and plays on the Anglo ideas of the French being vain and barbaric, it's present in all of the media from back in the day, still is in some cases.
If these were bespoke false lashes is possible, but given the time period I would imagine they'd be aggressively curled and made prominent with heavy mascara, much of the length of the lashes that normal mascara gives is by caking up, thickening, and colouring the very fine tips of your natural lashes. Look at yourself in profile against a light in a mirror and you'll see how long your eyelashes are and then face the mirror without the light to see what you can normally see.

Oldest "falsies" as they were called were made by gluing a strip of curled hairs onto a strip of very fine gauze or even fish swim bladder and attached with spirit gum to the lashline above the natural lash, these were then clipped to the appropriate length. In the theatre the fine gauze ones could be reused and they had wax pearls at the ends of them to make them more visible under the phosphorescent stage lights.
 
Hongourable Madisha said:
Same for people born with weird snaggly little peg teeth, dentists will put crowns on them or build up composite on top of the tooth to make it bigger.
Click to expand...
In Japan it's seen as "cute". Idols and Models have them
Yaeba-Japaneses-Attitude-Towards-Crooked-Teeth.webptomomi-itano-akb48-japan-yaeba-snaggletooth-1.webp
While in South Korea 16-18 year K-Pop Idols will have complete veneers or lamination out the gate
a1bdbf0bdeb50243fe21bf3829360b09.webp
 
CertifiedFedBot said:
The early turn of the century was the era of yellow journalism, they didn't sew hair or threads into their lashlines, that would not work as they would be immediately rejected as a foreign body and cause a massive infection, they also didn't have the types of synthetic threads we have today that are inert. This is obviously false and plays on the Anglo ideas of the French being vain and barbaric, it's present in all of the media from back in the day, still is in some cases.
If these were bespoke false lashes is possible, but given the time period I would imagine they'd be aggressively curled and made prominent with heavy mascara, much of the length of the lashes that normal mascara gives is by caking up, thickening, and colouring the very fine tips of your natural lashes. Look at yourself in profile against a light in a mirror and you'll see how long your eyelashes are and then face the mirror without the light to see what you can normally see.
Click to expand...
Do you have any sources? I am genuinely trying to find anything debunking this practice and I just can't. Google is not helping me here.
 
My cravat doesn't flutter said:
Do you have any sources? I am genuinely trying to find anything debunking this practice and I just can't. Google is not helping me here.
Click to expand...
You won't. The sources of this practice are tabloids from a time when the average person or journalist had no concept of foreign body rejection and only a very rudimentary concept of the causes, function, and treatment of infection, this is 30 years before the discovery of Penicillin the first commercial true antibiotic. Hairs and threads, even monofilaments like silk, are filthy when we're talking about microbial growth, the eyelids are so thin you can see through them. It's simply an impossible thing to sew hairs through the lashline and not tear or cause a massive infection, well outside of a modern surgical setting at least.
There is the possibility that they used an adhesive to attach single hairs to the lashline not unlike modern extensions, the early 1900s were a big time for the invention of cosmetics, but this wouldn't really reach its peak until the 20s and 30s with silent pictures and the talkies.

NoBueno said:
I know this is a horror stories thread. But I was still kind of horrified
View attachment 7566911
Click to expand...
I think she looks great, 20 years younger and the result will settle in about 6 months.
 
Last edited:
Polychromos said:
She has the same thing going on as Belle Delphine. Technically the sloped piggy nose was achieved, but the proportions of it are completely off.
Click to expand...
"Reddit cute" just pisses me off for some reason. This like, blushy faced "uwu bean" phenotype, it's so cloying and fake. The absolute obsession with people to fake a button nose with makeup or get surgery is just so annoying. I get it if you have a honker or a beak or something, but for fuck's sake why are you permanently rearranging your face to appeal to a bunch of gooners??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom