All the Feds have to do is make the Judge regret removing the ankle monitor. Whether or not this is true...the fact Baked said the words 'My friend who was drunk and driving' yet never corrected it shows he has extremely bad judgment. Can they present evidence? They just need a couple 30 second clips to make a judge keep his face in his hands and realize what a mistake he's done.
They need very little to amend or revoke a release order. While something like actually committing a new crime, even if not convicted of it, usually guarantees it (lolcows seem to have absurd luck on this), they can also invoke public safety, flight risk, danger to another, and other things, and the standard of proof for committing another offense isn't high. It's only a probable cause standard.
So if the judge finds probable cause to think Baked has committed another offense, no matter how minor, it's then up to Baked to prove that he should still be trusted. For other things, like violating bail conditions or being a danger to the public for some other reason, they need clear and convincing evidence. "Clear and convincing" is a standard higher than the 51% of the "preponderance of evidence" standard used in civil cases, but less than "beyond a reasonable doubt."
The prosecution, in a short document, has alleged both, that Baked has committed new (unspecified) offenses, and is in general a danger to the public, and that he should therefore be returned to home detention and yeeted off the Internet. I'd really rather see the fucker behind bars, but we'll see what happens.
The prosecution hasn't asked for that, but the magistrate could do it on his own if pissed off enough.
