Battlefield General - Discuss the series here

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I think I'm good on buying battlefield 2042 even if it's 3$, atleast V has a story mode and 2042 is likely going to be totally dead when 6 comes out since it'll be a better product that takes place in the modern era. I'm not grinding for those mid tier skins.
 
Professor Donger said:
1755884169688.webp
Click to expand...
I’m getting some MW2 cover art vibes with their desert locust skins.

1755890077394.webp
 
That Chris Guy said:
I'm hoping this means the shotgun is still very lethal, but being further away will have more pellets miss. Whether they will make a pass on slugs or not, I dunno. I just don't want it to be the Halo 2 shotgun where you have to jam that thing down their throat before you can score a kill.
Click to expand...
They will most likely make it absolutely garbage, then people will complain about that, and another update will be needed to actually make it balanced, I honestly didn't even think it was that crazy in the beta, you still had to hit your mark with it, if you just clipped an arm or leg it generally would not one-shot kill.
 
Plumber's Kokoro Wish said:
They will most likely make it absolutely garbage, then people will complain about that, and another update will be needed to actually make it balanced, I honestly didn't even think it was that crazy in the beta, you still had to hit your mark with it, if you just clipped an arm or leg it generally would not one-shot kill.
Click to expand...
Can confirm, you needed to be within 10-15m for a confirmed kill. Maybe it was just net code?
 
The Last Stand said:
Can confirm, you needed to be within 10-15m for a confirmed kill. Maybe it was just net code?
Click to expand...
I feel like most people seething about it just didn't register the multiple times they were shot at by the shotgun and it missed or the player using it took two or three shots to kill them, I seethe whenever I die and blame whatever killed me as bullshit cheap garbage, but on the inside I know that sometimes I'm just bad. Gotta have something to blame as cheap hax...
 
Plumber's Kokoro Wish said:
I feel like most people seething about it just didn't register the multiple times they were shot at by the shotgun and it missed or the player using it took two or three shots to kill them, I seethe whenever I die and blame whatever killed me as bullshit cheap garbage, but on the inside I know that sometimes I'm just bad. Gotta have something to blame as cheap hax...
Click to expand...
If they’re considered about balance, maybe adjust the drop off with range. I believe shotgun slugs can shoot further than what people expect.
 
The Last Stand said:
If they’re considered about balance, maybe adjust the drop off with range. I believe shotgun slugs can shoot further than what people expect.
Click to expand...
Possible, I never tried using the slugs so don't know if those felt OP.

I also personally just thought the ARs were better, good for mid and long range, and decent close range when hip fired while prone. In close quarter shoot outs I would regularly drop to the ground and spray hip-fire and it would often help me wipe 3 or 4 people because of how much it tightened up the spread, not to mention very few people seemed to be expecting someone to just be laying down.
 
Plumber's Kokoro Wish said:
I feel like most people seething about it just didn't register the multiple times they were shot at by the shotgun and it missed or the player using it took two or three shots to kill them, I seethe whenever I die and blame whatever killed me as bullshit cheap garbage, but on the inside I know that sometimes I'm just bad. Gotta have something to blame as cheap hax...
Click to expand...
This ^ I actually disliked the shotgun specifically because I was trash with it. I'd be pointing it at someone, shoot and miss completely.
 
30+GameOvers said:
EA cutting off it's nose to spite it's face wasn't on my bingo card, but I guess I shouldn't be surprised. This all but guarantees that the jetpack advanced movement BO7 will not flop, at least not until it starts pumping put retarded skins and making poor decisions later down the game's life cycle.
BTW you're delusional if you think EA or DICE won't ruin the game some other way. Have we forgotten V and 2042 already? All this means that the game will get less sales.
Click to expand...

30+GameOvers said:
I don't give two shits about either game cause I am not going to play them, but I will greatly enjoy antagonizing both sides during this retarded FPS slapfight. Also, I am right, and movement FPS games are superior to conquest slop. Why else would Battlefield be dead over all these years while FPS games only get faster paced? Because that's what players want to see, that's why.
Click to expand...

8018745.webp

"THEY RUINED BATTLEFIELD!"

I'm fine with movement shit...in Unreal Tournament. Or Titanfall. Or Crysis. Or Halo. I don't want zip-zooping around Battlefield, and it's dumb to have it there. If it was so tantamount to the experience then 2042 would've had much greater success, and Titanfall 2 would've crushed IW and BF1, neither of which occurred.

Do I think they might lose some adderall-addicted dopes by making that decision? Sure, but the game's better off that way, and takes it further away from CoD shit. Am I still concerned that EA could very easily fumble the ball in some other way that could kill its momentum? Definitely.
 
Last edited:
That Chris Guy said:
If it was so tantamount to the experience then 2042 would've had much greater success, and Titanfall 2 would've crushed IW and BF1, neither of which occurred.
Click to expand...
If you knew what you were talking about, you would know that Titanfall 2 was sabotaged by EA and that's why it didn't do as well as he should have.
You can like the game if you want, I'm not stopping you, but you're going to have to accept that BF6 is overrated and trying to alienate a large portion of your audience will do no favors for it. People want advanced movement slop, if Battlefield won't evolve it will just die out again since nobody cares about the "Battlefield Experience" anymore. They can get that in Delta Force and other games, Battlefield isn't special anymore.
Must suck to know that the only reason Battlefield is popping off is because COD refugees are keeping the "hype" afloat, huh?
 
30+GameOvers said:
If you knew what you were talking about, you would know that Titanfall 2 was sabotaged by EA and that's why it didn't do as well as he should have.
Click to expand...
anyone that has ever touched titanfall 2 know that game died because of their own spastic retards, they also know that the faggots cope and seethe about it and blame EA, even using the fagex legends cope.

the others are right, if the adderall was good, many adderall focused games wouldn't bomb so fucking hard that it triggers faggot denial, it's a hard pill to swallow but i find it funny since the faggots that like this gay shit swallow much worse things.
The Last Stand said:
I’m getting some MW2 cover art vibes with their desert locust skins.
Click to expand...
they kind of have a COD dude in the dev team don't they? :smug:
 
30+GameOvers said:
If you knew what you were talking about, you would know that Titanfall 2 was sabotaged by EA and that's why it didn't do as well as he should have.
Click to expand...

I know full well that Titanfall 2 being released in the same window as those two was a deliberate shot in the foot, and it sucked. Nevertheless, it is a game built with advanced movement in mind and that was fine, but acting like reducing sliding and bunny hops is going to somehow spell Battlefield's downfall is being dishonest, to say the least.

30+GameOvers said:
People want advanced movement slop, if Battlefield won't evolve it will just die out again since nobody cares about the "Battlefield Experience" anymore. They can get that in Delta Force and other games, Battlefield isn't special anymore.
Click to expand...

By that same logic, people also want goofball skins, yet there is a sizeable group of people who wish to migrate away from that sort of thing. I've seen Delta Force, and it looks like it's going to go the way of Rainbow Six Siege with its dumb-as-fuck skins drowning out whatever semblance the game had to a military shooter. What a fucking disgrace given its origins.

For a guy who complains about CoD and Fortnite, you seem very eager to make everything ape those two and fail as a consequence of being a weaker facsimile of them. Games can exist that don't have sliding and jump bullshit, and I think Battlefield will do fine without movement tech. I actually expect the round of nerfs to be disappointing in that they won't do enough, but we'll see.
 
Last edited:
30+GameOvers said:
If you knew what you were talking about, you would know that Titanfall 2 was sabotaged by EA and that's why it didn't do as well as he should have.
You can like the game if you want, I'm not stopping you, but you're going to have to accept that BF6 is overrated and trying to alienate a large portion of your audience will do no favors for it. People want advanced movement slop, if Battlefield won't evolve it will just die out again since nobody cares about the "Battlefield Experience" anymore. They can get that in Delta Force and other games, Battlefield isn't special anymore.
Must suck to know that the only reason Battlefield is popping off is because COD refugees are keeping the "hype" afloat, huh?
Click to expand...
I just wanted to let you know that you are the biggest faggot on this site and we have a literal faggot that tried to get an incel to fuck his man ass.

He isn’t one billionth of the faggot you are. Congratulations, faggot.
 
Last edited:
I grew up playing Unreal Tournament and I love movement shooters but Battlefield is not a movement shooter. Why do these fags want that shit in this game?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom