TheHarbinger
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2022
It makes no sense within the context of the show. But when you know the motivations of Vince Gilligan it makes sense. The Shield has an ending where basically all of the protagonists lose. They are dead, in jail, or are rats and snitches with no friends. Sopranos ends with pretty much everyone in the Soprano family dead and Tony feeling the noose tighten around him to the point where a simple diner meal with his family is like a life or death terrifying situation. Those endings are dark but you can still rewatch those shows. Those endings arguable enhance rewatches.The ending was completely retarded and makes zero fucking sense.
Breaking Bad and BCS have endings that whitewash the lives of the protagonists so that subsequent viewings are more palatable for the audience. Basically the opposite of Game of Thrones where everything turns out so badly that no one is motivated to watch again. So BB uses its last season to set up Walt against Nazis and White Supremacists and have Jesse get rescued in the end. BCS uses its last season to have Jimmy take the blame for the entire criminality of the cartels and rescue Kim. Now Jimmy is just a "gee golly gosh aww shucks" good natured man. The lawyer with deep down inside a heart of gold that you can root for on the next viewing because you know that in the end he is a good person. Unlike Tony Soprano or Vic Mackey that are monsters from start to finish.
So now you can rewatch BB and BCS and not feel bad rooting for the main characters. Howard? Hank? Chuck? Gomez? Just gotta forget them. The real main characters of the show are like heroes. Walt is killing Nazis. Getting his family money. Rescuing Jesse. Saul is eating the entire criminal history of the Fring and Heisenberg cartels. And atoning for his brother. And rescuing Kim. Jimmy is literally given the most reddit tier moment on the entire show in the end where the prisoners chant "Better Call Saul" over and over like he is coming through the gates of Valhalla.
Not only did he not feel guilt but he goes out of his way to pursue more criminals to represent. Launders money. And is literally advocating that Badger be murdered when we first meet him in BB. He is deep into the criminal world at that point with no remorse. And BCS refines that even further by having him be a divorced loser sociopath that is basically black pilled on romance. He has nothing to live for outside of being Saul. Hence the obsessive rewatches of his lawyer commercials.Jimmy went 8 years not feeling a single ounce of guilt.
You can if your name is Vince Gillian and you have an army of sycophants to suck you off endlessly. You can end your show like Lost or Game of Thrones and the fans will still defend your honor to the death. The only difference between GRRM and Vince Gillian is that one has fans who recognize bad writing and other knows how to finish a story on time.You can't do 5.9 seasons of remoseless crime, spend the intro of every season and every episode outlining how much the main character loves crime and misses the good old days, then have the finale be "I confess to everything I'm so sorry and so guilty lock me up and throw away the key"
It fits the fandom which was the point. The entire point was fan service for morons who are too juvenile to watch programs for adults. They need their faggy Walt hero moments like him blowing up cars or shooting machine guns or staring into the camera like a badass (in the body of a 5'6" kike) and saying douche chilling lines like "I AM THE ONE WHO KNOCKS".The ending just does not fit the show or the characters.
Great shows? Are you really going to watch BCS again? Knowing what the ending is? And still call it great? BCS and arguably BB should be seen alongside something like Game of Thrones. The more you rewatch BCS the worse it will get in the long run.Let's not suck vince's cock *too* hard, both BB and BCS are great series but the endings get more retarded the more you think about them. I outlined BCS above, but breaking bad isnt' far behind.