- Joined
- Jul 7, 2022
I remember this now. Yeah, it's an ending that has a little bit of hope for the boy himself, but ultimately is still bleak. Even if the boy survives for a while, humanity and the world at large is done for.I was referring to the boy finding other people. Readers I know were conflicted by the ending because it seemed to good to be true.
The final sentences you're referring to
are describing an image of life from a world that is gone forever. I think he put that in to "soften the blow" of the "happy" ending: oblivion has merely been delayed, and the most tragic events might be coming, because now the boy has even more to lose in a dying world. .. but that's how life is, isn't it?
I think I would have felt differently if I read it when I was in my early 20s. I found Blood Meridian affecting but not The Road. Probably something to do with more overall "going on:" characters, themes, plot, etc. The Road just seems sparser to me.The Road is a hard book. McCarthy's books always threatened to hurt me when I read one for the first time, but they don't hurt that much less the second time. I've found The Road deeply affecting every time I've read it, and I always find more in it.
I do plan to see it. Big fan of Viggo.The movie by John Hillcoat is, by the way, decent. Not great, but a competent version of the story. The ending anyways gets me.
It's totally filmable if they have the right approach and a lot of talent. But those are big maybes. IMO they can't hope to translate it 1-to-1 to the big screen so they shouldn't be afraid to take some liberties. Nothing that affects the themes/meaning/broader plot. The best film adaptations aren't afraid to bring their own creativity to the material.I have no hope at all for the planned film version of Blood Meridian. There's talent behind it, but I don't think it's filmable, and not just because of the violence.
Has to be my biggest pet peeve with McCarthy.Honestly, I love how he wrote dialogue without quotation marks. It forces you to pay closer attention and to process what you're reading in a different way. It might be self-indulgent to some, but art is self-indulgent.
Writing your work in such a way that it is often confusing if people are talking are not, and who is talking, is a cheap way to get people to "pay more attention." If I have to flip back a couple paragraphs because I didn't realize I was reading dialogue, that's on the writer. If I can't tell who is saying what because everyone talks with the same vocabulary and cadence, that's on the writer. Compare a passage where two of the gang members are talking to each other, without dialogue tags, to a scene where the Judge is speaking without dialogue tags. The Judge has a distinct way of speaking that is immediately identifiable, so the lack of dialogue tags doesn't pose any difficulty. There are many areas of Blood Meridian (and his other works) where this is not the case. Classic example of something that would get you reamed in a writing workshop/mentorship/class but that McCarthy gets away with because he's "an artist."
Run-on sentences are completely different, McCarthy uses them well to build tension, frenetic energy, or weariness. The lack of dialogue tags and quotation marks makes me legitimately tilted.
Oh descriptive and knowledgeable about the geographic areas he writes about. Yes I agree 100%, he's great at that.I phrased that rather poorly lol. To me reading McCarthy's Tennessee books is like having a famous author describe your hometown, the surrounding area, and the people that inhabit it. Those "See Rock City" barns I was talking about are only in one very small portion of the country and I saw many of them when I was young. I've been to "Rock City" lol.
This is a great passage and fantastic monologue but it's another example of my point. Men are inherently evil. As long as there are people, there will be war. Surely this is not news to anyone who has studied history or taken a single philosophy class. The Judge thinks this is great because he's an evil person (whether he's Satan, Death, some other form of evil incarnate, or just a really awful person is up for debate I suppose).I think the issue with a lot of the discussion around Blood Meridian is that it is so easy to discuss the obvious stuff and ignore the more interesting bits.
https://youtu.be/pU8MwGGqUqs?si=aBornml_dua3aXBq
This specific section has so many layers I can't even begin to explain why I love it so much.
Given my above seething about dialogue tags, I bet I would really like this as an audio book.Honestly Blood Meridian is the single best audiobook I've ever heard, as the way the book is written lends itself really well to an audio format.