Bluesky - "Decentralized" Twitter Alternative. Leftist Tranny Hugbox. "Answer" to Elon Musk's "Fascist" Takeover of 𝕏 (Formerly Twitter).

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Makes me curious why so many leftist news sites are turning on Bluesky. Is it because of fear of these faggots costing the democrats more elections, or do they fear their own safety?
Twitter wasn't as leftist as Bluesky is. There's also significantly fewer people using it than Twitter right now or Leftist Twitter did at its peak. Advertisers just look at it as a D tier website from a purely metrics perspective and have no real reason to use it. From a journo perspective if I get more engagement from posting my article on Twitter or even Threads than I do on Bluesky why would I keep using it?
 
View attachment 6763111

the fixation on smearing everyone they don't like (null, singal) as pedophiles is annoying to me. if you just use it like "nazi" to mean "everyone who disagrees with me" you rob the word of meaning and help destigmatize the actual behavior it describes. a few years ago it was very popular for the same people to accuse gender-critical women of being pedophiles and it was a bad look then too.
When someone accuses you of cheating, it's often because they're cheating themselves.

They doth project their guilty conscience too much.
 
Last edited:
This always ends up being subscriptions with extra steps. In theory it might be able to work, but so far nothing really has shown it working (everything that has something like this also has one or more of the other funding methods).
You don't have to go full retard in any one direction for it to work. You can incorporate non crypto stuff and crypto stuff and subscription and non subscription models.
 

Bluesky: A Land of Unicorns, Rainbows and Death Threats​

JOHN SEXTON 1:20 PM | December 13, 2024

Last month I suggested that having all of the most woke/progressive people abandon Twitter for Bluesky was unlikely to produce a social media utopia. The problem isn't the platform it's the people using it who have set themselves up as unofficial content moderators for the space. If you violate their particular sense of woke propriety, they will do their best to drive you off with whatever wild claims and personal attacks they can muster.

Continued:

https://hotair.com/john-s-2/2024/12...-unicorns-rainbows-and-death-threats-n3797862
Archive:
https://archive.is/swhjD

View attachment 6767124
Is there anyone with news aggregator accounts like ground news or Hacker news that lurks here that's willing to submit these articles into their outlets?
Screenshot 2024-12-19 at 02-49-16 Submitting a Source to Ground News.png
These pieces are kind of invisible because "allies" will most likely just sweep this Singal situation under the rug so anyone with an aggregator that can add or suggest the articles from this thread and the Singal thread would be appreciated to make this situation more visible.
/media-shill
 
Last edited:
Why do you think he has not been banned yet?
I assumed Singal isn't banned because he really hasn't violated TOS just by being on BlueSky, and presumably even the actual mods aren't so dumb as to not realise that banning people based on community demand sets a precedent that will make everyone else steer clear.
 
Someone should legitimately report this troon to the school they work at

I have a feeling the account is a TERF troll. The posts are just too on-the-nose.

It's still horrifying even if it is fake, though. Why? Because the troons have created such a friendly and judgement-free environment for the worst kind of perverts that this is the only type of pushback anyone can muster:

Screenshot 2024-12-19 at 10.37.30 AM.png

The only disagreement the poster gets after posting about sex crimes involving children is "heyyy friend, not a good look, think about what our enemies will say about this!"

In other words, even if the account is fake, we know that man in the "community" who is exposing himself to children will get a similarly tepid negative reaction (if he gets a negative reaction at all). Like I said, fucking horrifying.
 
I have a feeling the account is a TERF troll. The posts are just too on-the-nose.

It's still horrifying even if it is fake, though. Why? Because the troons have created such a friendly and judgement-free environment for the worst kind of perverts that this is the only type of pushback anyone can muster:

View attachment 6766840

The only disagreement the poster gets after posting about sex crimes involving children is "heyyy friend, not a good look, think about what our enemies will say about this!"

In other words, even if the account is fake, we know that man in the "community" who is exposing himself to children will get a similarly tepid negative reaction (if he gets a negative reaction at all). Like I said, fucking horrifying.

The crime in their eyes isn't that he's doing it (because they're all doing it), it's that he's unsubtle when he does it.
 
I assumed Singal isn't banned because he really hasn't violated TOS just by being on BlueSky, and presumably even the actual mods aren't so dumb as to not realise that banning people based on community demand sets a precedent that will make everyone else steer clear.
They already did that to Josh though.
 
Back